1. TrendyProfessional1's Avatar
    Get out of here; sorry if there is already a thread. Sissies!!!!!

    AT&T Sues Verizon Over Wireless Coverage Ads - WSJ.com
    11-03-09 08:11 PM
  2. vatothe0's Avatar
    Sore losers.

    Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
    11-03-09 09:01 PM
  3. nyr88's Avatar
    Must be true for that kind or response!
    11-03-09 09:03 PM
  4. MRWOLF6969's Avatar
    This is funny I could see it if vzw didn't say 3g but they do. Oh and for the regular voice coverage at&t clames they must have forgot to have coverage in Des Moines IA.
    11-03-09 09:05 PM
  5. Trophias#CB's Avatar
    rofl.... this is so pro.
    11-03-09 10:51 PM
  6. tsguy52's Avatar
    I find this hilarious and really stupid on AT&T's part. Claiming that average Americans won't know the difference in 3G coverage, but yet they boast about their 3G coverage in almost every ad campaign.

    They've even educated everyone by this ad:

    Their iPhone is even named after the coverage!! iPhone 3Gs? No that doesn't imply anything...

    You can even find a dog with the fastest 3G network:

    That proposal delivered on the fastest 3G network:

    So OBVIOUSLY AT&T assumes everyone understands what 3G means, because it's the backdrop for all their commercials. To say that the map is misleading, when it clearly describes 3G coverage, would also mean that nearly every ad by AT&T is misleading.

    So why do they cry like a 5 year old little girl when VZW shows their true colors on paper? Because it's true.
    11-03-09 11:01 PM