[Dave Bourque]

Interesting. I was wondering if Trump is running in order to ensure that Hillary wins????? He knocked out Bush early, who was thought to be a shoe-in, now he's gonna knock out the rest of the "real" Republican candidates....

Hillary is now the Republican front runner. The establishment won't support Trump because they can't control him. Hillary is easily bought in comparison.

Z30STA100-5/10.3.2.2876

[Dave Bourque]

In my opinion, if the GOP does deny Trump the nomination, Clinton will win. If Trump runs as the GOP candidate, Clinton wins. Trump has alienated way too many of the moderate voters he needed to win the election. He has also stirred up a whole new group of left wing voters that will now come out to vote just to make sure he doesn't get in.

I disagree that Hillary would win vs Trump. There's many polls that indicate the opposite and that's because of her Grand List of scandals. In comparison Bernie Sanders doesn't have this many holes to poke at

Z30STA100-5/10.3.2.2876

[Denise in Los Angeles]

Hillary is now the Republican front runner. The establishment won't support Trump because they can't control him. Hillary is easily bought in comparison.

Z30STA100-5/10.3.2.2876

Hillary will be Trumps' punishment. Imagine him losing to her... LOSER!!

[Denise in Los Angeles]

Hillary is now the Republican front runner. The establishment won't support Trump because they can't control him. Hillary is easily bought in comparison.

Z30STA100-5/10.3.2.2876

Trump could have not run. My thought was did he decide to run, so to better guarantee her winning?


Who could have forseen Bernie doing so well, as a side thought...

[Denise in Los Angeles]

You know what they say, Trump really is not a Republican, right?

[Soapm]

I disagree that Hillary would win vs Trump. There's many polls that indicate the opposite and that's because of her Grand List of scandals. In comparison Bernie Sanders doesn't have this many holes to poke at

Z30STA100-5/10.3.2.2876

But Bernie's one hole is huge, he's a socialist...

[thurask]

I disagree that Hillary would win vs Trump. There's many polls that indicate the opposite and that's because of her Grand List of scandals. In comparison Bernie Sanders doesn't have this many holes to poke at

Z30STA100-5/10.3.2.2876

Most Bernie supporters aren't old enough to vote, though.

Plus, while Hillary Clinton is literally Claire Underwood, she is still more favored amongst minority voters.

[Dave Bourque]

Most Bernie supporters aren't old enough to vote, though.

Plus, while Hillary Clinton is literally Claire Underwood, she is still more favored amongst minority voters.

Most Bernie supporters are millennials capable of voting and finally figuring out that maybe Russel Brand is a total moron for suggesting not voting is the best option. The media is stacked against Bernie and 100% with Hillary. Online media is a totally different story. This is where his support grows.

Z30STA100-5/10.3.2.2876

[Dave Bourque]

But Bernie's one hole is huge, he's a socialist...

Social * Democrat. People shut up real quick when they hear his plans. They actually help the American people and fixes the broken system of 100% capitalism no government oversight. Moderate system does not take capitalism away but enhances it to work with the people. Some things should not be privatized ever period. Some things are better off privatized.

Z30STA100-5/10.3.2.2876

[shaleem]

If Trump wins, I'm asking Canada for political asylum! LOL! Frankly, I like Sanders. All the nonsense about him being a socialist makes me want to puke!

"It doesn't mean that much to me to mean that much to you."

[thurask]

I'm never too far away. I've been attending a few of the primaries getting ready for November.

#FU2016


Posted via CB10 on the President Underwood version of the BlackBerry Classic

How's your liver doing?

[anon(9721108)]

Canada needs to build a wall fast!!! ^_^

Sent from my BlackBerry 9900 using Tapatalk

[FrankUnderwood]

How's your liver doing?

Doing much better thanks for asking. Try to be nice to those who haven't watched as much as you have

Posted via CB10 on the President Underwood version of the BlackBerry Classic

[leglace1]

http://news.yahoo.com/iran-conducts-...085935504.html

How's that Iran Deal working for us now. Lol.

They are allowed to buy weapons from Russia, they got sanctions lifted, they got money unfrozen. They probably had much more enriched uranium than they told us. We probably did not set them back at all. Now they defied the missile testing protocol. I think they made out just fine.

Posted via CB10

[Dave Bourque]

http://news.yahoo.com/iran-conducts-...085935504.html

How's that Iran Deal working for us now. Lol.

They are allowed to buy weapons from Russia, they got sanctions lifted, they got money unfrozen. They probably had much more enriched uranium than they told us. We probably did not set them back at all. Now they defied the missile testing protocol. I think they made out just fine.

Posted via CB10

A ballistic missile is not a nuclear weapon... so I don't know what connection your trying to make because it's not there. Iran is an enemy of ISIS it's not the time to fight another front like the Republican apes wish to have. "Probably had" much more enriched uranium is not evidence

Z30STA100-5/10.3.2.2876

[Captain_Hilts]

http://news.yahoo.com/iran-conducts-...085935504.html

How's that Iran Deal working for us now. Lol.

They are allowed to buy weapons from Russia, they got sanctions lifted, they got money unfrozen. They probably had much more enriched uranium than they told us. We probably did not set them back at all. Now they defied the missile testing protocol. I think they made out just fine.

Posted via CB10

I knew someone would bring this up, almost as if they were HOPING something like this would happen just so they could say, "I told you so." The fact is that this test is not in violation of the multilateral agreement to slow Iran's nuclear development. However, it is potentially in violation of UN Security Council Resolution 2231, meaning that the US and UN will take an appropriate, diplomatic response. Please learn to separate facts from fear.

And again, what's YOUR solution, leglace1? You say for a fact that the deal is bad, yet you don't offer any compelling reasons why, you don't even acknowledge evidence or facts that support the deal, and you don't offer an alternative.

Posted via CB10

[LoneStarRed]

The Iranian leopard was never going to change It's spots. Obammy got his "legacy defining" headlines and that's about all he got. Iran got every thing else it wanted from that deal!

It was a "deal" indeed. Lol

"I don't think that word means what you think it means."

[Soapm]

The test defies the sanctions so have nothing to do with the deal.

Which brings up the bigger point, what was to stop the test without the deal? The sanctions doesn't seem to be working???

[Captain_Hilts]

The Iranian leopard was never going to change It's spots. Obammy got his "legacy defining" headlines and that's about all he got. Iran got every thing else it wanted from that deal!

It was a "deal" indeed. Lol

"I don't think that word means what you think it means."

Okay, now this post of yours best illustrates the difference between people like you and more rational individuals.

First, you're beyond thrilled that Iran is test-firing ballistic missiles, hence your (and leglace1's) "lol." Why are you beyond thrilled? Because, second, you hate Barack Obama. It's not that you hate the deal (you obviously don't even know anything about it, because if you did, you would explain the problems with it and OFFER AN ALTERNATIVE), it's not that you hate Iran, it's not even that you hate "President" Obama. You hate Barack Obama as a man, which is why you use derogatory nicknames like "Obammy" (probably without understanding the etymology of that particular insult). That shows your ignorance and that you're not at all serious about solving the world's problems.

Posted via CB10

[anon(9721108)]

be more concerned about North Korea, it is a closed dictatorship run by a fat little psycho boy. There is no comparison to Iran which actually has a functioning democracy (even though the Mullahs have a big say) There is no upside for Iran in threatening the region with nukes.

One of the primary reasons for Iran hinting they could build a nuke, if they wanted, is their next door neighbour Pakistan, which is a nuclear power. Iran has never cared about Israel (they dont really like them, of course) Persians don't know Israelis from a hole in the wall. Persians know Arabs, Turks and Pakistanis- that's their main concern. Netanyahu plays up the Iranian threat to keep the free cash flowing from Washington DC and Ottawa. Iran funds Hezbollah, true, but that is part of a strategy against the Sunni Arabs. Iran is Shia, and actually hates the Sunni ISIS.

Iranians are Shia, always the minority in Islam. The Sunni have always hated them and had a rivalry. Iran sees itself as the protector of Shia Minorities in the Islamic world, which is why they are involved in Iraq, Hezbollah, Yemen, Bahrain.

Iranians also have a cultural rivalry with the Turks (who they see as empty-headed barbarians) and Arabs (who they see as redneck camel jockeys with too much money)
Not everything is about the USA

Sent from my BlackBerry 9900 using Tapatalk

[LoneStarRed]

Okay, now this post of yours best illustrates the difference between people like you and more rational individuals.

First, you're beyond thrilled that Iran is test-firing ballistic missiles, hence your (and leglace1's) "lol." Why are you beyond thrilled? Because, second, you hate Barack Obama. It's not that you hate the deal (you obviously don't even know anything about it, because if you did, you would explain the problems with it and OFFER AN ALTERNATIVE), it's not that you hate Iran, it's not even that you hate "President" Obama. You hate Barack Obama as a man, which is why you use derogatory nicknames like "Obammy" (probably without understanding the etymology of that particular insult). That shows your ignorance and that you're not at all serious about solving the world's problems.

Posted via CB10

"Thrilled"? NO! Not by a long shot. Understanding the nature of whom you are dealing with is very different than being happy when something you dearly hope doesn't happen comes to pass due to idiocy and niavete at best and plain ineptitude or subversion at worst.

BHO is a one man wrecking crew and a godsend for extreme islamists. Egypt, Turkey, Syria,Libya, and Yemen to name a few have major uprisings of radicals who have destabilized or almost destabilized relatively centrist /secular Islamic regimes. Regimes which kept a lid on that cauldron of a region.

This administration like few others has done an excellent job in empowering those nations which are at odds with us. A nuclear Iran with billions to spend is a catalyst for much blood to be spilled. The House of Saud, for one, and Israel for two, are very aware of this.

Obammy's headlong pursuit of a legacy has been a disaster which I fear will have a worse sting in the tail that what has already transpired.



"I don't think that word means what you think it means."

[TomatoPaste]

Perhaps we ought to abstain from "lol".


Unless you're actually "laughing out loud" whilst making gobsmacking claims.


For old times sake; LOL.

Posted via CB10

[Captain_Hilts]

"Thrilled"? NO! Not by a long shot. Understanding the nature of whom you are dealing with is very different than being happy when something you dearly hope doesn't happen comes to pass due to idiocy and niavete at best and plain ineptitude or subversion at worst.

BHO is a one man wrecking crew and a godsend for extreme islamists. Egypt, Turkey, Syria,Libya, and Yemen to name a few have major uprisings of radicals who have destabilized or almost destabilized relatively centrist /secular Islamic regimes. Regimes which kept a lid on that cauldron of a region.

This administration like few others has done an excellent job in empowering those nations which are at odds with us. A nuclear Iran with billions to spend is a catalyst for much blood to be spilled. The House of Saud, for one, and Israel for two, are very aware of this.

Obammy's headlong pursuit of a legacy has been a disaster which I fear will have a worse sting in the tail that what has already transpired.



"I don't think that word means what you think it means."

Utter nonsense more symptomatic of Obama Derangement Syndrome than based on any real assessment of the situation. Just like those people who call him a tyrant with one breath and a feckless weakling with the other, you're claiming that he's destabilizing regimes, propping up regimes, and bolstering terrorists. Next, you're going to say he went back in time and collaborated with Israel to illegally sell missiles to Iran. Wait... that was Reagan. Maybe you'll say he unjustly went into Iraq, overthrew the leader, and began the policy of de-Ba'athification that precipitated the rise of ISIS. Oh, wait... that was Bush.

So yes, you clearly are thrilled. You want this deal to fail because it will give you yet another reason to hate President Obama to go along with all your made-up reasons. You don't even know anything about it, because if you did, you might actually, you know, offer an alternative.

Posted via CB10

[LoneStarRed]

More like" Reality is coming to bite you in the @$$ syndrome". They will not stop unless they are stopped. And when the time comes and all the niavete and denials are worthless, it will be "blut und eisen" that has to yet again be employed.

It has never changed! If they don't fear or respect you, they will eventually attack you. The cycle is well on it's way again.

ISIS being allowed to operate barely checked if at all is another example of my Obama Derangement Syndrome I suppose. Brutality, slavery, mass rapes, women traded for glocks , mass beheadings,etc. All this being allowed to happen barely checked. We had a chance to kill it in it's infancy. What did BHO do?

An excerpt from the AP today:

WORLD Iran fires 2 missiles marked with 'Israel must be wiped out' Associated Press
TEHRAN, Iran (March 9, 2016)*� Iran reportedly test-fired two ballistic missiles Wednesday with the phrase "Israel must be wiped out" written in Hebrew on them, a show of force by the Islamic Republic as U.S. Vice President Joe Biden visited Israel.

Such phrases have been emblazoned on Iranian missiles before, but this test comes shortly after the implementation of a nuclear deal with world powers, including the U.S., and follows similar drills in recent days.

Hard-liners in Iran's military have fired rockets and missiles despite U.S. objections since the deal, as well as shown underground missile bases on state television.



"I don't think that word means what you think it means."

[anon(9721108)]

I just saw that Fox News is scaremongering, telling everyone that Obama has let this happen and thats its the end of the world as we know it.

They know nothing about politics in the Middle East. Iran's enemies are Sunni Arabs, first and last. That is who Iran is worried about. No one in Washington DC seems to remember that Saddam - a Sunni Arab- fought a war with Iran for an entire decade, which did incredible damage to their country. No wonder they keep on guard.

Sent from my BlackBerry 9900 using Tapatalk