- You're neither keeping it real nor surreal. Surrealism as an artistic movement was meant to shock and offend the senses in order to expose and do away with conventions. What you're doing with your "I'm going to vote for whoever will give me the most free stuff" and "Don't blame me, I'm a product of my education" nonsense is nothing but juvenile ramblings that I assume are supposed to sound funny. If you are nothing but the product of your education, then your education was woefully inadequate. Now, how about adding something of substance?
Posted via CB10
"I don't think that word means what you think it means."medic22003 likes this.02-11-16 12:39 AMLike 1 -
- You're neither keeping it real nor surreal. Surrealism as an artistic movement was meant to shock and offend the senses in order to expose and do away with conventions. What you're doing with your "I'm going to vote for whoever will give me the most free stuff" and "Don't blame me, I'm a product of my education" nonsense is nothing but juvenile ramblings that I assume are supposed to sound funny. If you are nothing but the product of your education, then your education was woefully inadequate. Now, how about adding something of substance?
Posted via CB10
Posted via CB10LoneStarRed likes this.02-11-16 07:46 AMLike 1 - 02-11-16 08:20 AMLike 1
-
-
They both owned cottages at the same lake, about a block apart and had regularly made appearances at each other's parties.
So, yes, there are moments!
Incidentally, when the Conservatives were in power federally, they appointed Gary Doer (NDP) as the Canadian ambassador to the USA.
And, don't forget that during the war of 1812, we BURNT THE WHITE HOUSE DOWN. So, don't mess with Canada!grover5 likes this.02-11-16 09:03 AMLike 1 - Not necessarily, although there are funny moments. Quite a few years ago we had a Progressive Conservative Premier named Gary Filmon, whose spouse was named Janice. He was defeated by an NDP person named Gary Doer, whose spouse was named Janice.
They both owned cottages at the same lake, about a block apart and had regularly made appearances at each other's parties.
So, yes, there are moments!
Incidentally, when the Conservatives were in power federally, they appointed Gary Doer (NDP) as the Canadian ambassador to the USA.
And, don't forget that during the war of 1812, we BURNT THE WHITE HOUSE DOWN. So, don't mess with Canada!
Posted via CB1002-11-16 09:37 AMLike 0 -
- Canada, meh! All you have now is maple syrup, maybe beer and a seen nothing, done nothing drama teacher for a PM. Not impressed. you all can't even get bacon right!
"I don't think that word means what you think it means."medic22003 likes this.02-11-16 11:13 AMLike 1 -
-
Although, to be realistic, we'd have to get opinions of Narendra Modi, not Donald Trump.02-11-16 11:31 AMLike 0 -
-
-
- I'm confused (a more normal situation than I like to admit). What exactly is an immigrant?
Is it a person who comes to a country for a better life who is willing to learn the customs and language and follow the law? Who is willing to work hard and contribute to society? Who follows the legal entry guidelines? Obviously I have an important and selfish reason for this question.
If that person is just coming to get on the welfare system, I don�t want them. We don't want FOREIGN freeloaders who come and multiply into even more freeloaders! Why? Easy! Less free stuff for me!
If that person is coming to re-create what they left why the h311 are they leaving their country? And who is stupid enough to let them takeover pockets of the host country? And more to the point, less free stuff for me.
If they come illegally, well they broke the law! Doesn't it apply to them? Aren't others following the law? Why do the lawbreakers get rewards by being allowed to stay? And why do I get less free stuff because of lawbreakers?
If they follow the rules and come here to work hard, I'm all for it! That way, you guessed it, more people working equals more free stuff for me.
"Aren't we all immigrants?" Well kumbayah to you. None thinking can't we all just get along reasons like that is why France and Sweden and Norway and Germany, etc are in crisis right now!
In conclusion, (I feel brainy writing that), I don�t want my entitlement to free stuff endangered by non working, possibly dangerous "immigrants". Wow, writing all that was hard work. I'll try not to make it a habit!
"I don't think that word means what you think it means."medic22003 likes this.02-11-16 02:22 PMLike 1 - I'm confused (a more normal situation than I like to admit). What exactly is an immigrant?
Is it a person who comes to a country for a better life who is willing to learn the customs and language and follow the law? Who is willing to work hard and contribute to society? Who follows the legal entry guidelines? Obviously I have an important and selfish reason for this question.
If that person is just coming to get on the welfare system, I don�t want them. We don't want FOREIGN freeloaders who come and multiply into even more freeloaders! Why? Easy! Less free stuff for me!
If that person is coming to re-create what they left why the h311 are they leaving their country? And who is stupid enough to let them takeover pockets of the host country? And more to the point, less free stuff for me.
If they come illegally, well they broke the law! Doesn't it apply to them? Aren't others following the law? Why do the lawbreakers get rewards by being allowed to stay? And why do I get less free stuff because of lawbreakers?
If they follow the rules and come here to work hard, I'm all for it! That way, you guessed it, more people working equals more free stuff for me.
"Aren't we all immigrants?" Well kumbayah to you. None thinking can't we all just get along reasons like that is why France and Sweden and Norway and Germany, etc are in crisis right now!
In conclusion, (I feel brainy writing that), I don�t want my entitlement to free stuff endangered by non working, possibly dangerous "immigrants". Wow, writing all that was hard work. I'll try not to make it a habit!
"I don't think that word means what you think it means."
Posted via CB1002-11-16 02:35 PMLike 0 - That was brilliant. A perfect example of where it will end up when you sing that song and allow that "Aren't we all immigrants " philosophy to apply to the unstopping flood of foreign freeloaders. Note: Domestic homeborn freeloaders like me are okay. Just sayin.
"I don't think that word means what you think it means."02-11-16 02:48 PMLike 0 - I'm confused (a more normal situation than I like to admit). What exactly is an immigrant?
Is it a person who comes to a country for a better life who is willing to learn the customs and language and follow the law? Who is willing to work hard and contribute to society? Who follows the legal entry guidelines? Obviously I have an important and selfish reason for this question.
If that person is just coming to get on the welfare system, I don�t want them. We don't want FOREIGN freeloaders who come and multiply into even more freeloaders! Why? Easy! Less free stuff for me!
If that person is coming to re-create what they left why the h311 are they leaving their country? And who is stupid enough to let them takeover pockets of the host country? And more to the point, less free stuff for me.
If they come illegally, well they broke the law! Doesn't it apply to them? Aren't others following the law? Why do the lawbreakers get rewards by being allowed to stay? And why do I get less free stuff because of lawbreakers?
If they follow the rules and come here to work hard, I'm all for it! That way, you guessed it, more people working equals more free stuff for me.
"Aren't we all immigrants?" Well kumbayah to you. None thinking can't we all just get along reasons like that is why France and Sweden and Norway and Germany, etc are in crisis right now!
In conclusion, (I feel brainy writing that), I don�t want my entitlement to free stuff endangered by non working, possibly dangerous "immigrants". Wow, writing all that was hard work. I'll try not to make it a habit!
"I don't think that word means what you think it means."
Posted from my Verizon Z10 10.3.2.85802-11-16 02:54 PMLike 0 - I'm confused (a more normal situation than I like to admit). What exactly is an immigrant?
Is it a person who comes to a country for a better life who is willing to learn the customs and language and follow the law? Who is willing to work hard and contribute to society? Who follows the legal entry guidelines? Obviously I have an important and selfish reason for this question.
If that person is just coming to get on the welfare system, I don�t want them. We don't want FOREIGN freeloaders who come and multiply into even more freeloaders! Why? Easy! Less free stuff for me!
If that person is coming to re-create what they left why the h311 are they leaving their country? And who is stupid enough to let them takeover pockets of the host country? And more to the point, less free stuff for me.
If they come illegally, well they broke the law! Doesn't it apply to them? Aren't others following the law? Why do the lawbreakers get rewards by being allowed to stay? And why do I get less free stuff because of lawbreakers?
If they follow the rules and come here to work hard, I'm all for it! That way, you guessed it, more people working equals more free stuff for me.
"Aren't we all immigrants?" Well kumbayah to you. None thinking can't we all just get along reasons like that is why France and Sweden and Norway and Germany, etc are in crisis right now!
In conclusion, (I feel brainy writing that), I don�t want my entitlement to free stuff endangered by non working, possibly dangerous "immigrants". Wow, writing all that was hard work. I'll try not to make it a habit!
"I don't think that word means what you think it means."
Posted via CB1002-11-16 03:38 PMLike 0 - Here is a fun and potentially new stat to the conversation.
No modern Democrat has ever won the Presidency following a Democrat. It's been 150 years. Even more interesting (sort of at least) Reagan to Bush is the only time in about a century that any party retained the White House.
Says a lot about how the country feels after 8 years of one party in the White House. It also make me thing the country really liked Ronald Reagan.
As for me, I cannot decide which train wreck I'd rather see. Consider me undecided or "None of the Above".02-11-16 08:08 PMLike 0 - 02-11-16 09:25 PMLike 3
- Forum
- CrackBerry Community
- Rehab & Off-Topic Lounge
Who is your US presidential candidate?
« BlackBerry considering Apple based Priv2
|
Apple�s iPhone Crackdown Is A Marketing Stunt�But A Good One »
Similar Threads
-
Is it worth getting a q10,rather than a classic in 2016?
By CrackBerry Question in forum Ask a QuestionReplies: 3Last Post: 02-01-16, 11:29 AM -
Why has my phone restarted several times?
By CrackBerry Question in forum General BlackBerry News, Discussion & RumorsReplies: 1Last Post: 01-29-16, 02:32 PM -
What is a BBM cross platform ? How do I download one ?
By CrackBerry Question in forum Ask a QuestionReplies: 2Last Post: 01-29-16, 01:36 AM -
Is BlackBerry priv available in India?
By thevoyager in forum Ask a QuestionReplies: 2Last Post: 01-28-16, 11:31 PM -
Is there a Free tethering option for my Bold 9900?
By Amine Mohamed in forum BlackBerry OSReplies: 1Last Post: 01-28-16, 10:11 PM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD