Cadillac- because bmw's have too many problems and are too expensive to fix. also if it gets hit you should see the autobody on that .. not so pretty to get fixed. Cadillac's are just better made and nicer... I like the newer ones... there sexy
My fiance does auto body, I wanted BMW at first and he told me yes there nice but they suck with accidents. If you need to fix a BMW autobody wise there junk.
No way.. BMW gets crushed... Now what you should talk about it is an Aston Martin... There only 100'S of thousands of dollars .. The 2011 is 285,295.00 and they go up alot more then that. Those cars are sick.. they are fast as ****. Wish I had that money I would buy one in a heart beat
kbz1960- just because you dont like cars doesnt mean you need to be rude.... half these threads are dumb.. what makes the other ones different from this one.
BMWs are fanstastic cars and its 3 series is top of the class every year. My mother has an x5 and although she likes it very much it is terrible in the snow. This is the overall feeling across the brand, if you see lots of snow, bmw is not for you.
Also, i think there are way too many out there, i like more unique things so i am really liking cadillacs or Audi.
kbz1960- just because you dont like cars doesnt mean you need to be rude.... half these threads are dumb.. what makes the other ones different from this one.
Oh so sorry, just my mood at the time. I thought it was going to be one of those mock threads.
Anyway BMW if you have money to throw away and Caddy if you're a poor man but not so poor.
OH and was dun dun dun my entrance? LOL
Last edited by kbz1960; 04-08-11 at 03:38 PM.
Reason: about dun
Oh so sorry, just my mood at the time. I thought it was going to be one of those mock threads.
Anyway BMW if you have money to throw away and Caddy if you're a poor man but not so poor.
OH and was dun dun dun my entrance? LOL
It's okay.. lol and caddy's are pretty nice. Or was that dun dun .. to me, i wasnt really nasty just sometimes i get a little outta hand. I was pretty nice to you lol.
It's okay.. lol and caddy's are pretty nice. Or was that dun dun .. to me, i wasnt really nasty just sometimes i get a little outta hand. I was pretty nice to you lol.
Yes you were and thank you? So would your caddy be pink?
No way.. BMW gets crushed... Now what you should talk about it is an Aston Martin... There only 100'S of thousands of dollars .. The 2011 is 285,295.00 and they go up alot more then that. Those cars are sick.. they are fast as ****. Wish I had that money I would buy one in a heart beat
Oh, the things I would do to get a new Aston Martin DBS in my garage. It's one of my four "Lotto cars," cars that I would get should I ever be lucky enough to win the lottery. The others would be a 1967 Shelby GT500 Mustang (my favorite car of all time), a current year Shelby GT500 Mustang, and a current year Ford F-150, because I love to camp and hike.
But I digress, back to the OP's question. Not taking into account maintenance and other expenses, I'd say BMW. Fast, good-looking cars, and I hear the M3 has some kind of voodoo handling because it's that incredible. However, in the real world, you do have to take into account other costs, and because of that I'd go with Cadillac. The new CTS V coupe is a freakin' beast (what's not to like about a 556HP supercharged V8?) with the looks to make its European competitors look like taxis. I believe the CTS V is more expensive initially than say, the M3, by a few grand but it's probably cheaper to maintain and repair.
Very tough choice but I really think that BMW is a bit overrated and I really think that the new American cars are underated.I also really like the new stuff Cadillac is doing.I guess if I had to choice I would go home with a big Cadillac Escalade
I think bmwers (prounounced beamers (no, BEAMERS, you racist sob)) look nicer - can't speak for how they run, never driven either lol.
That being said, at the cost I'd rather get a dodge challenger or a new camaro, or a restored late60s-early70s GTO.