[BeyondTheBox]

So every time I see a new thanked tally I have to search out the thread and post in which I was thanked. Is this weird? Anybody else?

[gyrferret]

Validation?

[Apocalypso]

Why do you feel you "have to"? Isn't the fact that your thanked tally has gone up enough?

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[BeyondTheBox]

@gyrferret - Not necessarily, as a matter of fact I wish I could remove about 5 of them which are, in my eyes, illegitimate.

@Apocalypso - It's not about being enough or not, it's about figuring out why. Not all of my comments are helpful comments, or even an attempt at being.

I still think it's pretty lame, I mean really, who cares, right? LOL! Part of me wants my thank count to actually count for something. Part of me wants to understand how I was helpful so I can rinse and repeat. I'm sure there's other parts that I have no desire to delve into, but in any case it's gotta be lame!!! ;D

Just thought I'd take a moment to make fun of myself.

[Laura Knotek]

What does this have to do with the 9700?

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[the_sandman_454]

I'm often curious. I look occasionally.

[Deathcommand]

Not lame.
I look to see what kinds of posts people will thank me in, I try to follow the format that they thank me in. Its called research.

[Rootbrian]

Guess this got relocated. I do make lame replies sometimes, but I don't wanna start asking peiple to use the search when they make a new duplicate thread like the 1000's of same ones already existing. Don't like getting shouted at for giving advice either.

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[rearview]

I'm just going to guess, "yes"

[SCrid2000]

So what're you gonna do when you get thanked more than once for a post?