- None the less, this app was out on AppWorld waiting for testing and approval before BBW conference. RIM could not let this go through until they could showcase their "upcoming" native email client.
From the vids I've seen of their effort, this would outshine them anyway. If RIM's email client is not released VERY soon, and this is not approved before that then it serves to prove my point.
Articles say "RIM hints at email client for Playbook early May" Well, anyone look at the calendar? To me early May means 1st 10 days, mid May is 2nd 10 days, end of May is last 10 days of the month.05-09-11 10:12 PMLike 0 - your right, there is no way someone didnt make them, hence they are there for anyone to use (premium items).
calendar app - easy agenda for blackberry playbook
contacts app - personal assistant
email/twitter your right, there are a few IRC style chat clients, but none of the `mainstream` names.
to be clear the 2 apps above i havent tried, simply searched `calendar` and `contacts` on my playbook
easy agenda is a daytimer, not a calendar. no reminders, alarms, daily/monthly views, meeting invitations, etc. The developer does have a very nicely done website for his business though - gotta give him credit for that.
both apps have zero integration with exchange, notes, google, etc.
Bottom line, if i didn't have bridge, there's nothing in App World that would make me even consider giving up my google calendar/contacts, or OWA version of same.05-10-11 12:25 AMLike 0 - yes, that looked good too. hope they are not just looking for some way to bill us an addition 10-20 bucks/month to use it!05-10-11 01:08 AMLike 0
- No sideloading available, period. This came directly from Paul Bernhardt this past week at BlackBerry World.05-10-11 01:40 AMLike 0
- No sideloading available, period. This came directly from Paul Bernhardt this past week at BlackBerry World.05-10-11 07:27 AMLike 0
- how does not sideloading limit the potential of something? usre if it cost to enter the store from a dev end you could have a point, but its free for a dev to join appworld so its not relevant05-10-11 08:25 AMLike 0
- if we could sideload then we wouldnt be still waiting on RIM to approve this mail app. He could sell it via his own site and we could then load it ourselves. Really you dont see the benefit of getting 100% of your sale?
Last edited by howarmat; 05-10-11 at 08:49 AM.
05-10-11 08:34 AMLike 0 - What about putting your PB in Development Mode and installing an app like that? I used the emulator to test installing the CrackBerry web launcher, and if you go to the Options menu now, under Security, there is a Use Development Mode option. So if it works the same as it did on the emulator, then it should be possible to side-load, right?05-10-11 08:39 AMLike 0
- yea, running a ecommerce site is something all devs want to do, then they`ll also have to promote it themselves as its not on a store. while you do have a small point, the list of cons to running that way is far outweighed by the pros a appstore gives any developer05-10-11 08:48 AMLike 0
- this would also allow mobihand support for a store. which "approve" apps a **** of alot faster than appworld in my experience.05-10-11 09:34 AMLike 0
-
- What about putting your PB in Development Mode and installing an app like that? I used the emulator to test installing the CrackBerry web launcher, and if you go to the Options menu now, under Security, there is a Use Development Mode option. So if it works the same as it did on the emulator, then it should be possible to side-load, right?05-10-11 10:38 AMLike 0
-
Be happy we have this forum to express, suppose, guess about it ourselves.Last edited by dkingsf; 05-10-11 at 11:04 AM.
05-10-11 11:02 AMLike 0 - DenverRalphyRetired Network Mod
But you also have to look at it from the end-user perspective. In effect, it limits the end-user to only installing apps as dictated by BB/Appworld. I'm willing to bet that it's a rare BBphone user that hasn't installed any apps from outside Appworld.05-10-11 11:17 AMLike 0 - There are a lot of developers who are quite happy to market their own product. As well it blocks developers from selling their apps in other markets.
But you also have to look at it from the end-user perspective. In effect, it limits the end-user to only installing apps as dictated by BB/Appworld. I'm willing to bet that it's a rare BBphone user that hasn't installed any apps from outside Appworld.05-10-11 11:30 AMLike 0 - There are a lot of developers who are quite happy to market their own product. As well it blocks developers from selling their apps in other markets.
But you also have to look at it from the end-user perspective. In effect, it limits the end-user to only installing apps as dictated by BB/Appworld. I'm willing to bet that it's a rare BBphone user that hasn't installed any apps from outside Appworld.
you and i that browse the web and forums will look in other places of course, people who pick up their BB and go to themselves `appworld does apps? cool` wont then go looking for extra avenues.
id agree its a fair bet that no CB user only uses appworld, but i think from an `average joe` perspective thats not the case.
also most of these developers that market their own products (myself included) use mobihand/appworld, not our own ecommerce sites.Last edited by BBThemes; 05-10-11 at 12:44 PM.
05-10-11 11:36 AMLike 0 -
- Digital goods. Also think of other popular names (Beejive just to name one) who aren't actually selling their apps, per se, but are selling licenses. Having a site where someone can simply download the app and decide to pay for a service later is key. When I was told that there were no plans to allow this, I sort of felt like I had just asked Steve Jobs.05-10-11 12:48 PMLike 0
- And offering apps through your own site also allows for public beta releases, and quick turnaround on bug fixes. (and the ability to test fixes in the wild before posting them to said store-sites)
Just imagine how many apps have suffered through a week or two of bad reviews just because of bugs that were fixed the day after someone noticed. (Yet we have to wait quite a while longer for the fix to be available for public consumption.)
An E-Mail app is especially vulnerable to this problem, considering that they cannot possibly test it in advance with all possible mail servers, message encoding formats, etc, etc. (and yes, I speak from experience here)05-10-11 12:56 PMLike 0 -
- It's starting to get really annoying now. Every morning there's a handful of new 'crapplications' published (a gazillion BMI calculators, converters, to-do lists and others) but not the one app everyone is waiting for: a bloody email client.
I'm really disappointed in RIM for doing this to AiFlex who is offering a perfect solution for people who want mail right now rather than 'some time this summer'. It's ridiculous.danield76 and Hartikrishna like this.05-10-11 01:11 PMLike 2 -
- Forum
- BlackBerry PlayBook Forums
- PlayBook Apps & Games
aMail - Email for Playbook Video
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD