Originally Posted by
TheBirdDog I'm not sure what exactly you are referring to... Apps? Google Play access? A high-end all-touch device? What is it that BlackBerry didn't give to people when they wanted it? What do you see that they should have done so differently?
This has been done to death all over the place. Are you playing devils advocate here or what.
How about the Slider, but in 2013, and not with 2010 chipsets, but running BB10, with a PKB and Toolbelt.
BlackBerry never did right by BB10. Never. Not one single BB10 device they released was "no compromises" from the point of view of what made BlackBerry great, until maybe the Classic, but that was too late to actually have the kind of impact it COULD have had if it were released in 2013 at launch. If the Classic was the launch device, and the OS developers were given proper direction to effectively port the BBOS user experience over to a platform that had the HOPE of running modern apps like are possible on Android and iOS, then history might have been different.
What I'm saying is that the BBOS user experience is perfectly fine! You have apps, you can launch them, you have access to an App Store... the problem with BBOS is the TYPES of apps it could run, the physical capabilities of the devices weren't powerful enough to provide the types of app experiences that iOS and Android devices can. BBOS UX with the capability to have "modern" powerful app experiences would have been a better choice than what occurred. Imagine when BBOS had 80 million users, if they could have upgraded to a device that had the POWER of BB10, but the same UX as BBOS, they could have upgraded without skipping a beat: but BB10 was so different from BBOS there was no benefit to BBOS device users to sticking with BB10: if they were going to have to start from scratch and learn an entirely new full-touch UX, why stick with the underdog? Hence the rumoured "100% returns" on the early BB10 devices: BBOS users go in expecting the "next" BlackBerry, they get something altogether different, and decide "I'm not spending $700 on THIS, I'll just keep my current BB device" or they go completely off platform.
BlackBerry tried to BE Apple, when they should have stuck to being BlackBerry. They failed at being Apple, and they squandered their chance to be the Best BlackBerry They Can Be. Now, they are going to try to be the best Samsung they can be. Let's see how that works.
Originally Posted by
Blacklatino It's all about timimg with RIM and now BlackBerry, along with delays, lack-luster commercials. The Z30 should have been the Z10....two years earlier. Instead, we got the Z10 - which was and still is an awesome device with a crappy battery. The Z30 is still a beast and would have been a game changer for BlackBerry.....opening the door for all others. Again timing.
Exactly: the aphorism "too little too late" isn't apt: it's more like "enough, but too late", or "the wrong thing at the right time" or something.
There's a huge life lesson here about being true to yourself: if BlackBerry was "BlackBerry" in 2010-2013 during the development of the PlayBook and BB10, rather than trying to pass themselves off as "Apple, but better", things would have been different.
I guess the question is: is it completely totally too late for BlackBerry to be BlackBerry again?