google cries fowl as patents start to hurt.
- Apple Wins Two Original iPhone Patents Regarding Rotation Heuristics - Patently Apple
So now only Apple devices can have screen rotation? Come on now.07-26-11 01:53 PMLike 0 - The underlying problem is what you can patent in the US Patent system. Most of the patents in dispute are too broad. Take the Apple vs HTC patent dispute as an example. Apple is suing over patents that were applied for years before handheld platforms came about, and are so broad that the computer or device you're currently reading this on (unless it's an Apple product) is in violation of the patent.
Looks like Google is too late to the cell phone OS game...sorry my condolences. Tomorrow I start my own search engine, sorry Google just innovatin07-26-11 01:59 PMLike 0 - Apple Wins Two Original iPhone Patents Regarding Rotation Heuristics - Patently Apple
So now only Apple devices can have screen rotation? Come on now.07-26-11 02:04 PMLike 0 - Tre LawrenceBetween RealitiesI disagree. Motorola is already looking at different avenues and that was before all of this patent bs was happening, in terms of android.
Android was a good way to get manufacturers names out there and say "We make cool hardware."
Now this is littler differentiation between android phones AND manufacturers are going to have to PAY apple, google and MS. I think we can agree that they won't stand for that for long.
In terms of more oses, there will always be other software makers. Plus there is WEB OS to turn to because HP is going to license it out. There are plenty of options for everyone.
I am not concerned for consumers. At all. I am happy to see the in-fighting between these companies. At some point congress will step in and give everyone a good smacking.
But I agree, WebOS is definitely an option (hopefully).07-26-11 02:06 PMLike 0 - DenverRalphyRetired Network ModPatents are granted after being published. The patent application can be reviewed and contested before it is granted. So for a year or so a company can dispute the application. Just because Google started a phone os in 2008 when Apple had a patent or Oracle had patents before doesn't mean they have a right to that IP AFTER they start.
Looks like Google is too late to the cell phone OS game...sorry my condolences. Tomorrow I start my own search engine, sorry Google just innovatin
And then there's the concept of licensing a patent to others which is flawed. As it is now, if you make licensing available to one party, you also have to allow for licensing to others interested. The flaw in this though, is that tech companies get around this restriction by simply not licensing select patents at all, but instead selectively choose who they're going to sue for violating the patent.07-26-11 02:15 PMLike 0 - I think you're missing the point. The review and approval process of the US Patent system is flawed as it applies to intellectual property. As it stands now, you can patent a very broad idea, and any notion of anybody disputing its approval is laughable as the application isn't exactly on public display for easy reference to anybody who may wish to contest it. It's like sifting through a haystack trying to find one specific piece of straw.
And then there's the concept of licensing a patent to others which is flawed. As it is now, if you make licensing available to one party, you also have to allow for licensing to others interested. The flaw in this though, is that tech companies get around this restriction by simply not licensing select patents at all, but instead selectively choose who they're going to sue for violating the patent.07-26-11 02:25 PMLike 0 - DenverRalphyRetired Network ModIf a company only allows only one company to be licensed IP then its like collusion, anti competitive and ilegal. And any company that does not do its due diligence does so at their peril, or risk of...earlier I looked up RIM patents, wasn't very hard at all, whats the problem?
As for only licensing to one company... that is precisely my point. You can't do that. But the flaw in it is that companies get around it by not licensing a patent to anybody at all, which is completely legal, then simply pick and choose who they sue for patent infringement. It's a loophole that gets around selective licensing.01itr likes this.07-26-11 02:42 PMLike 1 - Ah I see what you're saying with the loophole. This is just my opinion here but if a company wins a lawsuit with one company and others are involved as you describe it, then we may never find out the results of negotiated settlement. The licensing fees and agreement would likely be confidential.07-26-11 03:42 PMLike 0
- Forum
- Popular at CrackBerry
- General BlackBerry News, Discussion & Rumors
google cries fowl as patents start to hurt.
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD