GCHQ able to track BlackBerrys in Flight
- In a cache of leaked NSA documents posted online today by author/journalist Glenn Greenwald, one slide outlines the GCHQ's ability to access BlackBerry devices on a GPRS connection.
If you're not connected to a GPRS network, I wouldn't worry too much about this. GPRS/EDGE/UMTS have been known to be vulnerable for a long time.
It isn't clear exactly when they gained this ability, or what the "further details of usage" are.
Source: Glenn Greenwald / "No Place To Hide" Documents (PDF)
The above slide can be found on page 91 of the PDF document in the link.05-13-14 06:27 AMLike 0 - BrantaRetired Network ModSuspicious... this claims GCHQ can intercept devices which are (a) supposed to be shut down and (b) often out of range or otherwise unable to connect to cellular networks. On the face of it there would be a higher probability of cellular interception for devices in normal ground use with full connectivity. However in reality any attempt to intercept the radio link is difficult, unreliable, and expensive when compared to the ease of intercepting via the cellular network's NOC or interception of internet traffic.
ISTM this finally discredits Snowden as a fake and Greenwald as a publicity seeking money grubber.05-13-14 06:52 AMLike 0 - I have always considered removable batteries to be a big part of security. I hope the next few high end devices have removable batteries. It's true that if your device (phone, computer, tablet) is off, but the battery is in, it's not really off. Hackers / government can access it, your camera, microphone, etc.
Posted via CB1005-17-14 06:52 AMLike 0 - There is a logical flaw with the statement.
Let's assume that GPRS is indeed compromise-able.
My questions are of the following:
Let's assume that this thing was done during the BlackBerry legacy period days (i'm not so sure how BlackBerry 10 is effected, but i'm sure this has been like waaaaaaay back, since Snowden does claim things like its been done for a long time)
(just fyi, unofficially, the officials in my country believe Snowden. At least those whom I talk to believe them to be at least 90% true)
1. Wasn't BlackBerry BIS's implementation of GPRS / EDGE / UMTS data different from normal carriers because of the way BIS is written?
2. Since when BlackBerry wanted to anonymize the PINs, since the PINs are one of the pillars of BlackBerry legacy devices' security features?
3. If a person is supposed to turn off their phones in flight (my country does not allow flight mode, but people just do it anyway), and in particularly BlackBerry devices, how the hell can they trace an already turned off device IN FLIGHT?05-17-14 07:04 AMLike 0 - BrantaRetired Network ModSo the obvious place to intercept is when the aircraft's data stream arrives at the service provider's ground station. That's not "tracking BlackBerry" more like "tracking any and all devices" which use the stream, either from a specific aircraft or through a specific ground station or even whole service provider. You can be pretty sure they won't have a satellite sniffing the low power WiFi link between the device and aircraft interface against the general background of terrestrial WiFi noise, and the aircraft skin should block or attenuate most signals which might try to escape to the outside world.05-20-14 04:21 AMLike 0
- Quite the opposite, it's rather trivial...
this claims GCHQ can intercept devices which are (a) supposed to be shut down and
Second, cell phones, like most decent trunked (radio) system, always had options for remote activation, ask anyone who ever took basic courses on the subject - there is a reason why every security training starts with 'take the battery off your phone'... (remember the story when Snowden asked journos to turn off their phones then put all of them into the refrigerator? That's a trick against non-removable batteries. )
(b) often out of range or otherwise unable to connect to cellular networks.
On the face of it there would be a higher probability of cellular interception for devices in normal ground use with full connectivity.
However in reality any attempt to intercept the radio link is difficult, unreliable, and expensive when compared to the ease of intercepting via the cellular network's NOC or interception of internet traffic.
ISTM this finally discredits Snowden as a fake and Greenwald as a publicity seeking money grubber.Last edited by szlevi; 05-20-14 at 11:08 PM.
Omnitech likes this.05-20-14 10:54 PMLike 1 - So the obvious place to intercept is when the aircraft's data stream arrives at the service provider's ground station. That's not "tracking BlackBerry" more like "tracking any and all devices" which use the stream, either from a specific aircraft or through a specific ground station or even whole service provider.
You can be pretty sure they won't have a satellite sniffing the low power WiFi link between the device and aircraft interface against the general background of terrestrial WiFi noise, and the aircraft skin should block or attenuate most signals which might try to escape to the outside world.05-20-14 11:00 PMLike 0 - OmnitechDragon SlayerIf you look at the slide in the OP, it's an extremely limited kind of data collection they're referring-to there.
They can produce "events" - eg "phone just connected to network", "phone has an active data link", "device has PIN 0x3044AB47", etc.
What that tells me is not much, really. "Identifying PIN and associated email address" probably just means that they have a cross-reference - most likely provided directly by BlackBerry - that cross-references a list of active PINs along with email addresses assigned by BlackBerry. As in "blackberry.net" addresses assigned to BIS users that not many people use nowadays anyway. Remember that Snowden's data is historical, BlackBerry 10 didn't exist in those days.
GCHQ already taps into carrier networks - or just asks carriers for access - so they can collect, at the very least, the infamous "metadata" that we hear so much about nowadays. That's all that would be required for the kinds of "data collection" that it appears the slide in the OP refers-to.05-23-14 09:16 PMLike 0 - OmnitechDragon Slayer
Snowden is not a fake, though Greenwald may be a bit of a publicity seeker. In particular the money behind the news organization that he recently co-founded was provided by a guy with a questionable reputation and personal axe to grind, and Assange was none-too-happy about it.05-23-14 09:20 PMLike 0 -
Z10STL100-3/10.2.1.214105-23-14 09:38 PMLike 2 -
Snowden is not a fake, though Greenwald may be a bit of a publicity seeker. In particular the money behind the news organization that he recently co-founded was provided by a guy with a questionable reputation and personal axe to grind, and Assange was none-too-happy about it.
1. First Look Media is financed by Pierre Omidyar, pretty openly, no hidden facts here: First Look Media - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2. Omidyar is probably the "cleanest" (in terms of background) money guy you can ask for, with an absolutely shining reputation: he is the sole founder of eBay, he is worth around ~$8-10B, probably in the for 100-150 richest person on the planet, all made by himself (yes, he is a well-educated guy from a well-off, well-educated French background but still, he had an idea and while he was surprised how well it worked he knew how to execute; it is clearly his achievement.) He since poured more than a BILLION dollar of his OWN money into the Omidyar Group, a non-profit tasked to advance social and political development all over the globe, to help the progress in not-exactly-free countries (think of another very helpful freedom-fighter, George Soros but with less money-related issues in the eyes of the Teatards): How Pierre Omidyar Turned of eBay An Idealistic Notion Into Billions Of Dollars | Inc.com
3. Not only Assange did NOT have any bad words about him but he was actually using him as an example that when someone with all the money he has feels the worlds is not free enough so he is willing to pour money into a free press outlet instead of bribing politicians and courts etc to get his way then you have to wonder just how bad things are getting out there, mainly due to the level of state-sanctioned surveillance...
Here: Julian Assange to SXSW crowd: Even billionaire Pierre Omidyar sees that there's no real liberty | VentureBeat | Security | by Tom Cheredar
As a matter of fact Assange went so far as he called these reporters a "quite positive phenomenon": Julian Assange at SXSW: 'national security reporters are a new kind of refugee' | The Verge05-26-14 08:56 PMLike 0 - You are really confused, I think - got pretty much wrong, exactly the opposite way... do you ever check before you write something?
1. First Look Media is financed by Pierre Omidyar, pretty openly, no hidden facts here: First Look Media - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2. Omidyar is probably the "cleanest" (in terms of background) money guy you can ask for, with an absolutely shining reputation: he is the sole founder of eBay, he is worth around ~$8-10B, probably in the for 100-150 richest person on the planet, all made by himself (yes, he is a well-educated guy from a well-off, well-educated French background but still, he had an idea and while he was surprised how well it worked he knew how to execute; it is clearly his achievement.) He since poured more than a BILLION dollar of his OWN money into the Omidyar Group, a non-profit tasked to advance social and political development all over the globe, to help the progress in not-exactly-free countries (think of another very helpful freedom-fighter, George Soros but with less money-related issues in the eyes of the Teatards): How Pierre Omidyar Turned of eBay An Idealistic Notion Into Billions Of Dollars | Inc.com
3. Not only Assange did NOT have any bad words about him but he was actually using him as an example that when someone with all the money he has feels the worlds is not free enough so he is willing to pour money into a free press outlet instead of bribing politicians and courts etc to get his way then you have to wonder just how bad things are getting out there, mainly due to the level of state-sanctioned surveillance...
Here: Julian Assange to SXSW crowd: Even billionaire Pierre Omidyar sees that there's no real liberty | VentureBeat | Security | by Tom Cheredar
As a matter of fact Assange went so far as he called these reporters a "quite positive phenomenon": Julian Assange at SXSW: 'national security reporters are a new kind of refugee' | The Verge
Posted using my Z10 via CB1005-27-14 02:47 AMLike 0 -
He was mis-quoting Assange, I was correcting him - WTF does it have to do with your opinion about Assange as a reputable source...? Moreover I don't get it: you don't think Assange as a reputable source when it comes to quoting HIMSELF....?
Seriously: do you people even read the freaking post you decide to reply to with some inane crap like this...?05-27-14 10:04 AMLike 0 - Ummm... what?
He was mis-quoting Assange, I was correcting him - WTF does it have to do with your opinion about Assange as a reputable source...? Moreover I don't get it: you don't think Assange as a reputable source when it comes to quoting HIMSELF....?
Seriously: do you people even read the freaking post you decide to reply to with some inane crap like this...?
Posted using my Z10 via CB1005-27-14 05:37 PMLike 0
- Forum
- Popular at CrackBerry
- General BlackBerry News, Discussion & Rumors
GCHQ able to track BlackBerrys in Flight
Similar Threads
-
Blackberry Classic Doesn't Have A Touch Screen???
By ZayDub in forum General BlackBerry News, Discussion & RumorsReplies: 41Last Post: 05-19-14, 08:46 AM -
Type n Go functiionaly in 10.3
By mughni in forum BlackBerry 10 OSReplies: 5Last Post: 05-17-14, 12:46 AM -
Syncing to Microsoft Outlook
By Dusty_Cowboy in forum BlackBerry Z30Replies: 3Last Post: 05-13-14, 08:44 PM -
After 10.2.1.3175 leak installed OS ver. change to previous 2941 by itself!
By Nick Ponomarev in forum BlackBerry Q10Replies: 2Last Post: 05-13-14, 10:34 AM -
Blackberry Protect
By RichBBZ30 in forum BlackBerry Z30Replies: 1Last Post: 05-13-14, 07:54 AM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD