[sigint99]

This article was disinformation designed to mislead and suppress the truth.

[crazigee]

This article was disinformation designed to mislead and suppress the truth.

What truth was it trying to suppress?

Posted using my Z10 via CB10

[Omnitech]

This article was disinformation designed to mislead and suppress the truth.

As I stated earlier that could be, but it seemed a lot more credible than articles like the following:

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchin...t_17400357.htm
(Written by a state-controlled news organization)

8 Major World Figures And Their Smartphones
(Could be mostly correct, few details provided)

Which phones do world leaders use? | Technology | theguardian.com
(Nothing revolutionary here, could be correct)

Do world leaders like Obama still use Blackberry smartphones? - National | Globalnews.ca
(Talks about Obama using a BlackBerry but the headline photo is clearly NOT a Blackberry)

Obama to get NSA-secured BlackBerry 8830 - CNET
(Claims he had an 8300)

Presidential gadgets: What technology does Obama use? | Page 7 | ZDNet
(Shows 8300 and 8900 devices next to the POTUS on AirForce One - same pic used in the Top Level Telecommunications article)


This Cryptome stuff seems more interesting:

Obama Phones
(Shows a few BlackBerries.. but mostly corded high-security devices)

Obama Called a Moron at Phone Security
(Argues that Obama ignores instructions and standards for keeping his communications secure. )


So yeah, I suppose all that stuff could be propaganda.

Or not.