Enterprise switching back to Blackberry
- Just came across this on the Yahoo message board. I can't judge the credibility of the source but it's great to see non the less!
Yahoo! Message Boards - Research In Motion Limited - Enterprise switching back to Blackberry
"I could tell you what I've heard from numerous business associates, colleagues and leaders from other companies who are switching their entire corporations back to Blackberry"
Any other corporate types out there seeing this?01-11-12 11:45 PMLike 0 -
- This is where RIM is failing. They really need to market their strengths which is security, data compression, BlackBerry Balance and now activesync piggy backing off BlackBerry Fusion for encryption.
Market the devices to the professional and let the rest take care of itself. Right now their marketing is neither here nor there and for too long now has the other platforms been drinking their milkshake in the corporate world.M.Rizk likes this.01-12-12 02:05 AMLike 1 -
- Funny. Just yesterday one of my students was showing me his iPhone 4S and how he couldn't talk into it... whether it be for Siri or for a phonecall, but the bluetooth worked. I thought this was a one-off kinda thing, but apparently it's real according to that Huffington Post article posted in that link.01-12-12 07:11 AMLike 0
- As a enterprise mobility professional overseeing 5000+ Blackberry as well 1000+ iOS and Android devices (support via Good Technology) this isn't a trend of anything.
Every company is trying to understand BYOD and how (if) it fits with their company, culture and meets their needs. We implemented a BYOD program over a year ago and to date we have a couple hundred employees (out of 25k) so a blip. It's nice providing the option but many employees would rather keep their technology separate from work as well have their employer provide the device (and pay for it).
I understand the "entitlement" attitude and see it everyday from Apple fans at work, but not one of them can show me something business related that cannot be performed on a corporate Blackberry. Every App they tick off that can be used for "work", Blackberry has a similar App.
99% of BYOD users are merely doing corporate email / PIM and when we did the CBA / ROI - Blackberry is still cheaper to procure and manage. If (when) we do offer iOS as a corporate offering it would have similar restrictions which surprise, surprise is the reason employees want to use their own device.
We have provided a program for those that want to use their device of choice and I'm not surprised the adoption is not large.
RIM has the worst marketing and if they marketed what they do well it would help them as the OS 7 devices provide much of the functionality people want other devices for (outside of Apps).Last edited by Frank Castle; 01-12-12 at 08:38 AM.
01-12-12 07:55 AMLike 16 - Sith_ApprenticeMod Team EmeritusVery well written Frank and just about dead on the money. One thing I would add, GOOD Servers are junk compared with BES. They are extremely limited in the customization of the IT policies and frankly, a secure container on an unsecure device is worthless. Thats why I despise even using them in a trial here in the DoD, and also why NSA ranks the security of GOOD far less than that of BlackBerry on BES.01-12-12 07:59 AMLike 2
- sleepngbearRetired ModeratorFrank touches on a very significant point: device restrictions. Obviously the number of apps available pales in comparison tonthose for Androids and iOS. But there are still plenty of useful apps ... 50,000 is nothing to sneeze at. The problem is that so many BB's out there are on BES, and by necessity are probably pretty well locked down, which leaves a great number of BB users with the impression that they can't do anything with their BBs that they could do with others. I can tell you that this is exactly the reason why I dropped my BES plan for BIS years ago ... the company I was with at the time basically crippled my phone for some of the things I wanted to do with it. Not saying this is 100% of the problem, but it contributes greatly to the negative perception of BBs.01-12-12 09:09 AMLike 2
- I wrote a post not too long ago about how I think people who are issued a restricted BlackBerry for business use get a bad impression of what BB can do for them on the consumer side. It's 2 different worlds really.Thanks for the insight Frank, Sith and others.mithrazor likes this.01-12-12 10:02 AMLike 1
- Frank, What is your approach to Playbook/BBX devices down the road? We have the same set up with BES and Good. We disable Activesync due to security.01-12-12 10:07 AMLike 0
- As a enterprise mobility professional overseeing 5000+ Blackberry as well 1000+ iOS and Android devices (support via Good Technology) this isn't a trend of anything.
...
RIM has the worst marketing and if they marketed what they do well it would help them as the OS 7 devices provide much of the functionality people want other devices for (outside of Apps).
"Don't let users risk your job" or "Show the boss who's boss" would appeal, many companies still make "IT" decisions and not business decisions, it could be a rich vertical.01-12-12 10:09 AMLike 0 -
Two, to say you can provide much of the functionality outside of apps is like saying you have an airplane that can replicate everything abut an A380 without the flying; for many people, apps are the reason for the purchase, so to say you can replace everything but apps doesn't really solve the problem.01-12-12 10:17 AMLike 0 - RIM really should do entrenching marketing, or have a separate marketing portfolio specific to making companies more familiar with the new Blackberrys and their security features, and the best ways to configure them (as I'm pretty sure disabling third-party apps is not necessary for most companies, especially with blackberry balance)01-12-12 10:22 AMLike 0
-
From what I've heard you will need another BES (in addition to your BES) for Playbook management. It will be similar to Blackberry Server Express and free but I think it will still face adoption issues as that is another server / VM you will need to standup and manage etc.
Outside of that, I think it will be great having a BES management of Playbook as Good with iPad leaves much to be desired (though it's coming along). From what I've seen it will enforce password, password timeout and have remote wipe via Balance for "work" tagged content. I didn't have time for the beta that is underway and at the moment am not sure the OS 2.0 launch will support this BES or be POP/IMAP/ActiveSync based.
We also have ActiveSync disabled so it will be interesting.01-12-12 11:08 AMLike 0 - From what I've heard you will need another BES (in addition to your BES) for Playbook management. It will be similar to Blackberry Server Express and free but I think it will still face adoption issues as that is another server / VM you will need to standup and manage etc.
Edit: RIM's website on Fusion :: http://ca.blackberry.com/business/so.../mobilefusion/Last edited by highos; 01-12-12 at 11:24 AM.
01-12-12 11:20 AMLike 0 - Isn't that what BlackBerry Fusion is? And yes it's suppose to sit in front of BES and will be cross-platform. In a few of the videos recorded at CES I do recall RIM employees mentioning their OS 2.0 devices being on Fusion for their RIM email.
Edit: RIM's website on Fusion :: BlackBerry - Mobile Fusion - Manage BlackBerry Apple iOS & Android Devices in Canada
This is my understanding when discussing with my TAM.01-12-12 02:34 PMLike 0 - One, if RIM's problem is one of marketing and fixable, why haven't they fixed it by now? I mean, what are they waiting for, a solar eclipse?
Two, to say you can provide much of the functionality outside of apps is like saying you have an airplane that can replicate everything abut an A380 without the flying; for many people, apps are the reason for the purchase, so to say you can replace everything but apps doesn't really solve the problem.Last edited by kemj; 01-13-12 at 05:47 PM.
01-12-12 02:55 PMLike 4 - This should greatly increase corporate adoption: out of the box security!
http://crackberry.com/hands-blackber...berry-playbook01-12-12 07:20 PMLike 0 - I work for a company with over 10,000 emplyees. 5000 aprox with BB, byod was never a choice.GreekPlaya likes this.01-12-12 10:20 PMLike 1
- As a enterprise mobility professional overseeing 5000+ Blackberry as well 1000+ iOS and Android devices (support via Good Technology) this isn't a trend of anything.
Every company is trying to understand BYOD and how (if) it fits with their company, culture and meets their needs. We implemented a BYOD program over a year ago and to date we have a couple hundred employees (out of 25k) so a blip. It's nice providing the option but many employees would rather keep their technology separate from work as well have their employer provide the device (and pay for it).
I understand the "entitlement" attitude and see it everyday from Apple fans at work, but not one of them can show me something business related that cannot be performed on a corporate Blackberry. Every App they tick off that can be used for "work", Blackberry has a similar App.
99% of BYOD users are merely doing corporate email / PIM and when we did the CBA / ROI - Blackberry is still cheaper to procure and manage. If (when) we do offer iOS as a corporate offering it would have similar restrictions which surprise, surprise is the reason employees want to use their own device.
We have provided a program for those that want to use their device of choice and I'm not surprised the adoption is not large.
RIM has the worst marketing and if they marketed what they do well it would help them as the OS 7 devices provide much of the functionality people want other devices for (outside of Apps).01-13-12 07:55 PMLike 0
- Forum
- Popular at CrackBerry
- General BlackBerry News, Discussion & Rumors
Enterprise switching back to Blackberry
« O-V likes BB
|
lost bb »
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD