Canadian cops cry for BlackBerry wiretap
- Lol. Well I mean with all the evidence they need to convict people... If you said you were moving stuff, and they pull you over and you have nothing.... They can't convict you for a text message... Hek, you could just say you send them as jokes. I text my friends all the time telling them I'm going to end their life
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com04-06-09 08:39 PMLike 0 - What? You don't beleive me? What's your number, I'll text you right now saying I'm bringing over several pounds of X... That'll put us both in prison for a few years? I highly doubt that.... A text message isn't aenough to convict someone of a crime.04-07-09 01:59 PMLike 0
- This is not a new idea, that is the idea that law enforcement has a need and a legal right to be able to intercept all communications.
Google "CALEA".
The irony is that RIM has created a platform which does not comply and has marketed it successfully in the US.
In my opinion, it's only a question of time before they will be forced to comply.04-07-09 02:20 PMLike 0 - I don't really get it... I mean, the second they say they're watching everything you do on your cellphone, people won't use them for their illegal business It'll be back to meeting up to discuss business and pulling the batteries out of your phone. There's a way around everything04-07-09 02:38 PMLike 0
- This is not a new idea, that is the idea that law enforcement has a need and a legal right to be able to intercept all communications.
Google "CALEA".
The irony is that RIM has created a platform which does not comply and has marketed it successfully in the US.
In my opinion, it's only a question of time before they will be forced to comply.04-07-09 06:31 PMLike 0 - Yeah, all my "friends" use BB messenger since you can clear the convo's and the information is not stored anywhere, so its not stored like text messages. they can go back and read any past text's sent through cell phones through search warrents, but nothing through BBM04-07-09 09:13 PMLike 0
- To me it appears that RIM does not in anyway have to comply with this ACT. RIMs two NOCS opperate outside the US so would not have to comply. Blackberry Messenger being the obvious example. As I understand it, the data goes from your berry to a NOC then to the other berry. This totally bypasses your local carriers servers.04-08-09 07:48 AMLike 0
- For some companies, secure communication is very imporant. Did you see the movie "Duplicity"? Some rival companies are set on learning their competition's secrets. I'm sure come companies chose RIM's BES because of how hard it is to crack.
If I remember correctly, congress uses BES.04-08-09 08:29 AMLike 0 -
The Government does have export restrictions on AES encryption devices though, but since RIM is in Canada, they do not fall under this. This is probably why they will never become a US company.04-08-09 08:45 AMLike 0 -
It does not change the fact that CALEA is actively in force in the US or that telecom carriers in the US must comply. If you or anyone else, government agency official or not, uses the telecom network to transmit by voice or data any information, that information is traversing equipment which complies with CALEA which means that carrier must allow any authorized government agency access to it. Encrypted or not, they have a legal right to access it.
The only questions, in my mind are, where exactly does RIM fall? Are they a telecom service provider and are they subject to US regulations as part of the "cost" of doing business in the US?
FCC - Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act04-08-09 10:05 AMLike 0 - Just because your carrier must provide access to the data, there is nothing they can do about encryption that is contained within the data packet. RIM is providing a service on the networks. I can build a VPN from my laptop to a server, and while law enforcement can intercept the packet, they can't force me to provide them the decryption key. RIM would be no different.04-08-09 09:50 PMLike 0
- Just because your carrier must provide access to the data, there is nothing they can do about encryption that is contained within the data packet. RIM is providing a service on the networks. I can build a VPN from my laptop to a server, and while law enforcement can intercept the packet, they can't force me to provide them the decryption key. RIM would be no different.
The intercepting agency would have to decrypt the information themselves if they have the resources and means to do so.
One government has asked that RIM decrease their encryption (India, I believe) which RIM refused to do.
Canada wants the "key" which is of course ridiculous. RIM has stated that they do not have it because it is "owned" by the individual BB not by the server.
However, if the FCC manages to extend CALEA to include Blackberries (or more specifically BBM) something would have to change.
I can only speculate how this will pan out, but I do believe this is a current issue which is still being debated, and it is impossible to say that that BBM's will remain secure indefinitely.04-09-09 08:32 AMLike 0 - That is an excellent point, but consider this, what if the Canadian government, and/or the US government told RIM that in order to do business in those countries they would have to make some concessions. Don't you think they would do it? Wouldn't it be better to continue doing some business in those countries than to cease doing all business? Food for thought.04-09-09 01:49 PMLike 0
- Leave it to the Canadian government to screw up the one thing we got going. Take away the success of RIM and the only things that put us on the world stage are syrup, comedians, hockey players and Nickelback. FYI we're all really sorry about Nickelback. Its gotten way out of hand, their on the radio all the time and well,,, well their just awful.
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com04-12-09 01:13 AMLike 0 -
- Forum
- Popular at CrackBerry
- General BlackBerry News, Discussion & Rumors
Canadian cops cry for BlackBerry wiretap
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD