-
Amoled suffers at lower resolutions because pixels are large and visible. This revealed the flaws in the pentile sub pixel arrangement that Amoled panels were using. As resolutions increase, pixels get smaller and sub pixel arrangement issues decrease because sub pixels are not longer visible. Plus, new sub pixel patterns correct most of the issue to begin with.
People see what they want to see. People are convinced that Amoled has problems so they see problems. At the same time, people ignore the areas in which Amoled is clearly better than LCD.
I like both Amoled and LCD, provided they are good panels.
Posted via CB1009-19-13 06:40 AMLike 0 - That's not true.
Amoled suffers at lower resolutions because pixels are large and visible. This revealed the flaws in the pentile sub pixel arrangement that Amoled panels were using. As resolutions increase, pixels get smaller and sub pixel arrangement issues decrease because sub pixels are not longer visible. Plus, new sub pixel patterns correct most of the issue to begin with.
People see what they want to see. People are convinced that Amoled has problems so they see problems. At the same time, people ignore the areas in which Amoled is clearly better than LCD.
I like both Amoled and LCD, provided they are good panels.
Posted via CB10
BBM channels: c00121c99 for some knowledge and c00123fca for some real hip hop09-19-13 07:32 PMLike 0 -
BBM channels: c00121c99 for some knowledge and c00123fca for some real hip hop09-19-13 08:25 PMLike 0 -
480p/720p/1080p are all used to refer to the vertical pixels.
Because 4k sounds vastly more than 2160p, the marketers changed the term to designate the horizontal pixels.
4k in marketing terms isn't that impressive actually.
REAL 4k definitely is though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4K_resolution
Posted via CB1009-19-13 08:50 PMLike 0 - Well, 4k is a marketing gag as it's not really 4k, if we follow the currently established nomenclature.
480p/720p/1080p are all used to refer to the vertical pixels.
Because 4k sounds vastly more than 2160p, the marketers changed the term to designate the horizontal pixels.
4k in marketing terms isn't that impressive actually.
REAL 4k definitely is though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4K_resolution
Posted via CB10
BBM channels: c00121c99 for some knowledge and c00123fca for some real hip hop09-19-13 09:08 PMLike 0 - Hmmm well I saw the Sony 65inch 4k at the Sony store and it looked marvelous, the resolution was 3840x2160p, and from what just I read they are going by horizontal pixels thus the 3840 equalling 4k. Not true 4k, but it still looked amazing.
BBM channels: c00121c99 for some knowledge and c00123fca for some real hip hop
4K is the professional standard. 3840p is the consumer standard.
One is aquistition, one is finishing. I wish we could all just stick with 2K and 4K at 24fps (not 23.976), but that would be too simple at this point.
-signed a film-filmmaker who is so sick of digital and the millions of codecs and imbecillic standardsIgotsThis likes this.09-19-13 09:24 PMLike 1 - It's the same with 1080p. 2K is the professional standard. 1080p is the consumer standard.
4K is the professional standard. 3840p is the consumer standard.
One is aquistition, one is finishing. I wish we could all just stick with 2K and 4K at 24fps (not 23.976), but that would be too simple at this point.
-signed a film-filmmaker who is so sick of digital and the millions of codecs and imbecillic standards
Thank you!
The consumer, like I just proved, is fairly more accustomed to the 480p/720p/1080p nomenclature.
4k will be used for marketing purposes nonetheless.
Professionals, as it's often the case, will know it better apparently.
Posted via CB1009-19-13 09:43 PMLike 0 - Hmmm well I saw the Sony 65inch 4k at the Sony store and it looked marvelous, the resolution was 3840x2160p, and from what just I read they are going by horizontal pixels thus the 3840 equalling 4k. Not true 4k, but it still looked amazing.
BBM channels: c00121c99 for some knowledge and c00123fca for some real hip hop
I have also seen one (would need check my photos to know what TV it was though) and there is just no comparison with 1080p, if the film material the TV is using, is adapted to the resolution.
I am just more impressed with "real" 4k (or 8k if it is easier to make the distinction).
An 8k beamer/projector for a home cinema must be the ultimate tool
Posted via CB1009-19-13 09:47 PMLike 0 - No disputing that it looks amazing!
I have also seen one (would need check my photos to know what TV it was though) and there is just no comparison with 1080p, if the film material the TV is using, is adapted to the resolution.
I am just more impressed with "real" 4k (or 8k if it is easier to make the distinction).
An 8k beamer/projector for a home cinema must be the ultimate tool
Posted via CB10
A projector would be so sweeett........
BBM channels: c00121c99 for some knowledge and c00123fca for some real hip hopMarsupilamiX likes this.09-19-13 10:32 PMLike 1 -
- I was wondering if anyone knows if the screen is full RGB or pentile. After using both the HTC One X and Samsung Galaxy S3, 720p should be perfectly fine on a 5" screen if the screen is full RGB. The HTC One X's (4.7" but shouldn't too big of a difference) screen looked incredibly sharp and crisp while the S3's fuzzy edges bothered the hell out of me.09-19-13 11:09 PMLike 0
-
- See no difference in icons or sharpness here. Checked it with note 2 and htc one. See all ok
Posted via CB1009-20-13 04:19 AMLike 0 -
- I was wondering if anyone knows if the screen is full RGB or pentile. After using both the HTC One X and Samsung Galaxy S3, 720p should be perfectly fine on a 5" screen if the screen is full RGB. The HTC One X's (4.7" but shouldn't too big of a difference) screen looked incredibly sharp and crisp while the S3's fuzzy edges bothered the hell out of me.
Posted from my Zed 1009-20-13 08:48 AMLike 0 - Reporting back: So I managed to get my hands on one of these today and spent about 5-10 minutes playing with it. It is an incredible device, but there is a slight difference in overall sharpness compared with a couple of Android devices HTC, S4 but it is not that big of a deal. The device feels really good. Considering getting one once they are released.09-20-13 02:45 PMLike 0
-
Last edited by techvisor; 09-21-13 at 12:00 AM.
09-20-13 11:38 PMLike 0 - Actually you might think it looks like ****. My phone is 5" 1080p (441 ppi) and when I look at other displays under 400 they don't look that good anymore. Just look at the other thread on CB where the guy has Z30 already and is answering questions. In his first post to start thread he states that Z30 display doesn't look as crisp as a 1080p display. I'm not saying 1080 is be all end all but trust me when people get used to it they will not want anything less.09-20-13 11:47 PMLike 0
-
- I don't think you realize how PPI works. You don't see the difference between 1080p and 720p on a 55" LED TV because you are sitting 10 feet away. On a phone that you hold 6-12" away, you can absolutely tell the difference. PPI is a function of viewing distance, not screen size.
Last edited by saintforlife; 09-21-13 at 01:36 AM.
09-21-13 12:52 AMLike 0
- Forum
- BlackBerry 10 Phones & OS
- BlackBerry Z30
Z30: Cool, but Only 295 PPI?
Similar Threads
-
Z30 Info Thread - Got a Z30? Tell Us About it!
By pkcable in forum BlackBerry Z30Replies: 427Last Post: 02-08-23, 07:12 PM -
Possibly one of the most disingenuous pieces on Blackberry Z30 release
By BB10Funding in forum BlackBerry Z30Replies: 82Last Post: 02-18-14, 11:38 PM -
That Z30 launch made me fist pumped!
By badiyee in forum BlackBerry Z30Replies: 12Last Post: 02-10-14, 05:18 AM -
600 pounds for Z30?
By qcbarry25 in forum BlackBerry Z30Replies: 24Last Post: 09-19-13, 02:41 AM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD