1. silverbullet's Avatar
    12-30-13 11:38 AM
  2. qbnkelt's Avatar
    For those who would not want to click through and give the site hits for the article.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    It's been a harsh year for a number of the big names in consumer technology. While previous years have seen huge gadget successes such as Samsung’s Galaxy S3 or Apple’s iPad, 2013 seems more notable for fizzles than hits.

    Here are some of the year’s biggest tech busts.

    Galaxy Gear smartwatch

    Samsung's Galaxy Gear smartwatch is likely to go down as the biggest gadget bust of 2013. Reviewers savaged it, pointing out a number of limitations and deficiencies.

    For one, it only worked in conjunction with Samsung’s Galaxy Note 3 phone. Then there was the fact that it did little beyond supplying notifications and text messages. It was also big and bulky, and, at $300, overpriced.

    All that goes a long way to explain why Samsung sold fewer than 50,000 units of the Gear this fall.

    Windows 8

    Microsoft's Windows 8 operating system received criticism for its new interface. (Lucas Jackson/Reuters)

    Officially released to the public in October 2012, it took some time before the full scope of the operating system’s failure became known. By spring of this year, it was clear that Microsoft’s Windows 8 – which featured a snazzy tile-oriented, touch-enabled interface that was completely different from prior experiences – was a giant turkey.

    Huge tech flops are the legacy of 2013: Peter Nowak
    First-quarter computer shipments dropped 14 per cent from the previous year, according to IDC, which was almost twice as bad as what the tracking firm had expected. Worse still was the fact that the new operating system was originally expected to buoy PC sales, but it instead did the opposite.

    The radical changes were simply too much for buyers, to the point where Microsoft was forced to revert to some older features – such as the prominent placement of a “Start” button – with its Windows 8.1 update this past October.

    Surface tablets

    Microsoft's Surface tablet has a detachable keyboard. (Keith Bedford/Reuters)

    Similarly, Microsoft’s initial foray into tablets landed with a resounding thud. The Surface RT, released in October of last year, managed to sell fewer than a million units by the end of the winter, or a third of what the company had expected. The beefier Surface Pro, intended as a laptop replacement, sold just 400,000 in the month after its release in February. In contrast, Apple sold about 42 million iPads between October 2012 and the end of March 2013.

    Microsoft’s tablets were generally criticized for being too big and heavy, with not enough battery life or app capabilities. The RT also didn’t run a full version of Windows, meaning that users couldn’t take advantage of all the programs available for the operating system.

    “It had been crippled by the manufacturer, and that’s often the case with a failed product,” says Silicon Valley technology analyst Rob Enderle. “Somebody brings out a product and is afraid it’s going to cannibalize something that’s more expensive, so they cripple it and it doesn’t sell.”

    Wii U

    The Wii U features a controller with a built-in supplementary display. (Phil McCarten/REUTERS)

    Also released in late 2012, Nintendo’s newest video game console spent this year plumbing new depths of failure. The Japanese company chose to focus on casual gamers rather than the hard-core market and has been paying the price ever since, with non-core gamers proving to be fickle buyers.

    Not only did the hardware contribute to big losses at the company, it was also outsold during portions of the year by its older cousin, the Wii, which launched in 2006.

    Third-party developers abandoned the new console – designers at EA Canada, for example, proclaimed the Wii U to be “crap” and Nintendo to be “walking dead.”

    As if that wasn’t bad enough, the Wii U is now facing additional competition from new Sony and Microsoft consoles, the recently released PlayStation 4 and Xbox One, respectively. There simply wasn’t any good news for Nintendo in 2013, and it’s not looking like it will get better any time soon.


    The small Ouya console comes with 8GB of internal storage, 1GB of RAM and a wireless controller. (Ouya.tv)

    Speaking of game consoles, San Francisco-based startup Ouya tried to shake things up with its inexpensive Android-based machine, which launched in June.

    The initial idea – where all games would be free, with gamers paying only if they liked something – struck a chord with the public, raising more than $8 million through crowd-funding site Kickstarter. But the Ouya’s execution left reviewers with much to be desired.

    From a controller that lagged to a dearth of games – especially ones that couldn’t be found already on other consoles or mobile devices – the slim, $100 system failed to live up to its intention of setting the gaming world on fire. Tracking firm NPD Group said sales of the device itself were “relatively light,” while game developers reported poor returns for products sold through the console. So far, Ouya’s promised revolution has fizzled.

    iPhone 5C

    Apple's iPhone 5C is essentially last year’s iPhone 5 repackaged in a colourful shell. (Stephen Lam/Reuters)

    Not even mighty Apple, riding several years of record-breaking products, could withstand the forces of flop in 2013. Comparisons by several news outlets of the iPhone 5C, one of the two new phones launched by the company this fall, to Microsoft’s Surface RT were certainly ignominious.

    Moreover, analysts pegged sales of the 5C – which was essentially last year’s iPhone 5 repackaged in a colourful shell – as lagging considerably behind the 5S, the other, more advanced phone launched at the same time.

    Apple hasn’t disclosed sales figures for the 5C, but with several prominent retailers including Best Buy and Target cutting the device’s price in half after just a few weeks of availability, the signs of struggle were certainly there.

    Facebook Home/HTC First

    The HTC First cellphone has a built-in Facebook interface. (Marcio Jose Sanchez/AP)

    Remember the Facebook phone? It’s okay if you don’t – it’s one of those artifacts of 2013 that is sure to be quickly forgotten.

    Unveiled in April, Facebook Home was a downloadable interface for Android phones that would overlay on the basic operating system. It essentially inserted Facebook as the core function of the phone, with everything else riding adjunct to it.

    Not surprisingly, that freaked a lot of people out. While many Facebook users like the website for keeping in touch with friends and relatives and for sharing news and photos, there’s also a palpable fear of its pervasiveness, developed and cultivated through years of questionable privacy policies.

    The first optimized Facebook Home phone, the HTC First, was quickly pulled by AT&T in the United States after selling poorly.

    Google Glass

    Google Glass is a pair of glasses-like frames that function as a camera, display screen, touchpad, battery and microphone all built into one, so you can see a variety of information right in front of your eyes. (Flickr/Jean-Luc David)

    While it has yet to escape its beta-testing stage to become a full commercial product, few gadgets have turned the public off like the greatly hyped Google Glass.

    As a pair of eyeglasses equipped with a camera, it’s another entry in the wearables category, which promises a future where everything its wearer sees can be turned into data that can then be crunched and used – and in Google’s likely case, sold. But there’s the question of whether it’s a solution in search of a problem.

    “It creates more problems than it solves,” says Enderle.

    Indeed, with bars and restaurants and even transport regulators pre-emptively banning Google Glass because of its privacy and safety implications, it’s a technology that looks to be a long way away from mainstream acceptance. “Plus, it makes you look like a giant nerd,” Enderle adds.

    Wireless new entrants

    Mobilicity filed for credit and bankruptcy protection after Ottawa rejected a proposal by Telus to buy the struggling startup, and its future is now uncertain. (Mobilicity)

    It’s not just gadgets themselves that flop, sometimes their purveyors do too. In Canada, that's been the fate of several of the smaller wireless providers that were once the federal government’s best hope for more competition in the sector.

    Mobilicity filed for credit and bankruptcy protection after Ottawa rejected a proposal by Telus to buy the struggling startup, and its future is now uncertain. Telus did receive the green light from the Competition Bureau to buy Public Mobile, another new entrant.

    Wind, the third member of the independent trio, is on the block with its Russian-based owner Vimplecom looking to get out of Canada. While noises were made this summer about U.S. cellphone giant Verizon coming in to buy the company and perhaps some of the other startups, that possibility has since fizzled.

    All this leaves the government’s plans for more competition – and therefore lower prices for consumers – on the brink of flopping.

    BlackBerry 10

    The BlackBerry Z10 (left) and Q10 were launched with great fanfare in February, but haven't sold well.

    They were supposed to be the saviours of the company, not to mention Canada’s technology sector. But the long-awaited and repeatedly delayed BlackBerry 10 devices may be among the final nails in the company’s coffin.

    The all-touch-screen Z10 arrived in February, with the keyboard-equipped Q10 following in April. Despite relatively positive reviews, the poor sales that followed made it clear that smartphone users – once fiercely loyal to the Waterloo, Ont.-based market pioneer – had moved on.

    BlackBerry, it turns out, suffered from all the elements of a flop. As Kaan Yigit, president of Solutions Research Group, points out, BlackBerry’s devices lagged behind the advances made by competitors. And, as Krista Napier at IDC suggests, BlackBerry’s inability to match Apple and Android in apps and overall features made it tough for consumers to consider the new devices.

    The company, which is now in limbo as it searches for a buyer, also forgot its core market and tried to be too much like competitors.

    “They came out with an iPhone that wasn’t. It was just too similar to what they were trying to replace,” Enderle says. “They were so focused on going after Apple that they forget they have to be a better BlackBerry.”
    Last edited by elite1; 12-30-13 at 02:01 PM. Reason: Wrapped quote in [QUOTE] tags
    Azensun and Elite1 like this.
    12-30-13 11:41 AM
  3. stefan_'s Avatar
    Ah.. the typical garbage. It's fashionable to bash Blackberry. This writer has absolutely no idea why the sales were poor, so he desperately throws out some idiotic quote about Blackberry trying to be an iPhone. Apparently every touchscreen device is now an iPhone clone.

    What is the point in attempting to match the Apple Store's overall app count? 99% of them are throwaway. Anything you use on the iPhone daily is available on all platforms.
    firefighter1141 likes this.
    12-30-13 11:59 AM
  4. 21stNow's Avatar
    Some of these were not flops. I haven't followed the Surface tablets closely, but I don't think that Microsoft aimed for these to be huge sellers in the first place. There is a certain group that the Surface tablets will appeal to. Since it isn't the iPad crowd, the sales comparison was close to meaningless.

    The iPhone 5C was/is not a flop. The media and others may have expected something different from Apple with the 5C, but Apple released exactly what they wanted to release. While sales figures haven't been broken out by device this year, I doubt that the 5C has sold worse than the 4S did at this time last year. I would guess that the 5C has sold more than the 4S last year, but I have no way of knowing for sure.

    Google Glass shouldn't be on the list, as it isn't out yet.

    I have too much bias toward the Galaxy Gear to be objective on that one, but I don't think that Samsung aimed for sales of 1 million Galaxy Gears this year. I think that the 50,000 number is actually impressive considering the price of the Gear and the limited number of devices that it works with.

    Sadly, I agree with the BlackBerry assessment, though.
    12-30-13 01:45 PM

Similar Threads

  1. Listening to music on Blackberry's and in ear headphones!
    By cellphonejunkey in forum BlackBerry Q10
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-02-14, 09:55 AM
  2. BlackBerry Jakarta reportedly won't have a physical keyboard
    By CrackBerry News in forum CrackBerry.com News Discussion & Contests
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-01-14, 02:15 PM
  3. BlackBerry 'Hercules' concepts bundle phone, watch and tablet designs
    By CrackBerry News in forum CrackBerry.com News Discussion & Contests
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-31-13, 08:20 AM
  4. BlackBerry CEO John Chen: 'The journey has just begun'
    By CrackBerry News in forum CrackBerry.com News Discussion & Contests
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-31-13, 12:20 AM
  5. Will the Z30 be the last Blackberry Flagship Phone?
    By Brazen9000 in forum BlackBerry Z30
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-30-13, 04:48 PM