Where's it Touring after Verizon?
- 04-27-09 10:38 PMLike 0
- The Pre will be released before the 9630. Sprint is gonna wait a while till after the Pre then release the 9630. Sprint was gonna release the 9630 first before Verizon, but didn't because of the Pre. But it'll be Pre, Verizon 9630, (those two could get switched) but Sprints 9630 is last.04-28-09 07:07 AMLike 0
-
-
-
-
On this point of opinion I must heartedly disagree; purely from a marketing angle. Sprint has decided to bet the farm on a Palm product. How many followers does Palm have, in relation to RIM? When was the last time Palm had any 'buzz' in the field? (2001?)
Unless I am completely underestimating this Pre and it will truly revolutionize the cell phone industry the way Apple and RIM have, then I must insist that Sprint has got their cart before the horse (if that analog works).
Sprint has an opportunity to finally finally have a RIM first; so what if they don't have exclusivity upon release, they would get 'buzz' by being first with 9630. I suggest they would be wise to release Tour first ASAP and ride that wave until VZW releases the 9630, then Sprint's got the 1-2 punch with the Pre still in the holster. When Verizon begins promoting their new Tour, Sprint can say "Yeah we had that out 3 months ago; check out this new Palm Pre. Come take your pick."
This marketing 'dance' is about timing and I am convinced that Sprint is scr*wing the pooch by doing these two releases in the wrong order. (All this presumption is predicated on the notion that Sprint is even capable of releasing Tour first ASAP, which mayhap they can't technically pull off.)
Thats my never-to-be-humble expert opinion. But then again, maybe the Pre really is the next big iPhone.Last edited by theadrock13; 04-28-09 at 08:55 AM.
04-28-09 08:36 AMLike 0 -
- I agree, Sprint is bleeding customers each quarter, with no end in sight. My opinion? The Pre will not stop the bleeding. Maybe it will slow down, but not stop, and within a few years, Sprint will be rolled into VZ in a takeover.04-29-09 08:24 AMLike 0
-
You have to look deeper (beyond the CDMA-CDMA technology match), and recognize that Sprint isn't an attractive acquisition for *anyone*.
As a voting Verizon shareholder I wouldn't want it.04-29-09 09:05 AMLike 0 - Guinea, I trust your posts, but on this subject... from a financial perspective, explain how Verizon would carry costs of the in-process WiMAX network post-acquisition? "Goodwill" ?
You have to look deeper (beyond the CDMA-CDMA technology match), and recognize that Sprint isn't an attractive acquisition for *anyone*.
As a voting Verizon shareholder I wouldn't want it.
This company has been listed as a sell for months. The stockholders are angry, and the company as a whole is in a spiral. They have lost millions of sub's, in only a few quarters, let alone all of last year.
When Nextel was aquired, they were valued in the 20 Billion range (Sprint that is). They are down to a few billion, and dropping.
This is a "dream" takeover IMO. VZW is making money left and right, and (baring approval from the govt) could easily afford a hostile takeover right now if they truly wanted.
WiMax is no where near nationwide, and could easily be scraped for LTE.04-29-09 09:39 AMLike 0 - And I would.
This company has been listed as a sell for months. The stockholders are angry, and the company as a whole is in a spiral. They have lost millions of sub's, in only a few quarters, let alone all of last year.
When Nextel was aquired, they were valued in the 20 Billion range (Sprint that is). They are down to a few billion, and dropping.
This is a "dream" takeover IMO. VZW is making money left and right, and (baring approval from the govt) could easily afford a hostile takeover right now if they truly wanted.
WiMax is no where near nationwide, and could easily be scraped for LTE.04-29-09 09:46 AMLike 0 -
- A hostile takeover really isn't a definite possibility. they're absurdly (almost prohibitively) expensive and generally don't work in the long run. What makes you think it would have to be hostile (if you really do mean a hostile takeover)? A merger (or stock or asset purchase) is the only real possibility if it were to happen.04-29-09 09:58 AMLike 0
- And for the sake of the marketplace I hope Sprint comes back as a strong competitor rather than rolled into that abominable leviathan Verizon. I don't have any specific love for Sprint (though I am mid- a contract with them), but its inarguable that fewer choices in the market only hurt customers long-term.04-29-09 03:04 PMLike 0
- I think that Sherman and his Anti-Trust Act might step in before a merger or takeover of VZW and Sprint. The gov already stopped VZW from taking over all of Alltel04-30-09 06:37 PMLike 0
- A hostile takeover really isn't a definite possibility. they're absurdly (almost prohibitively) expensive and generally don't work in the long run. What makes you think it would have to be hostile (if you really do mean a hostile takeover)? A merger (or stock or asset purchase) is the only real possibility if it were to happen.05-01-09 07:32 AMLike 0
- Forum
- BlackBerry OS Phone Forums
- More BlackBerry Phones
- BlackBerry Tour 9630
Where's it Touring after Verizon?
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD