Works well on my 9530. Sitting at 52mb with little memory leak. Radio is as good as .90.
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
Huh? I thought the going consensus was that OSes for 9530 and 9500 were not interchangeable. Care to explain how you got the 9500 OS to work for you?
Oh, or are you one of the insiders?
I think it is important to spell that out so folks dont get confused and you have a slew of 9530 users trying to install an OS for 9500 and then posting about how it didnt work out for them.
Huh? I thought the going consensus was that OSes for 9530 and 9500 were not interchangeable. Care to explain how you got the 9500 OS to work for you?
Oh, or are you one of the insiders?
I think it is important to spell that out so folks dont get confused and you have a slew of 9530 users trying to install an OS for 9500 and then posting about how it didnt work out for them.
I totally agree Rooster. I think however that there may be OS's out there for the 9530 and the 9500 that share the same version number. I think it was CX who warned 9500 users off of .88 because of the charging issues and he was making reference to the 9530 when he posted that. .99 might just be really close to .100 and so Kevin didn't feel the need to, or didn't have access to or was asked not to leak .100 for the 9530.
It still is SLOW!! Way to slow. And like I said in that post: when in this stage of development speed still is an issue then the CPU most likely isn't up to the task. Yes, software optimizations can do a whole lot for any device, OS, driver or program BUT in this stage of development its just that: optimization. NOT a big leap forward in speed but more like..... a drop of water on red-hot piece of stone (excuse me for my lack of translation of this typical dutch thing to english, I guess you guys get the idea of it though ;-) )
Read the post/topic please, you'll understand.
So again, battery life is crappier then on .87 and .88, its better and somewhat faster overall, the wired headphone reboot on plugin is still there, screen redraws aren't always what they should be and sometimes the phone doesn't respond to touches at all, especially around lock/unlock times.
The speed of .90? .90 was just normal speed with me. .88 was VERY fast compared to all other versions. Mains charging and ironing out a few minor kinks and that would be my version of preference! I miss that rocketship
Originally Posted by MR 1JZ
im happy with it compared to .78 but it could still be better
lets hope they get the speed of .90 and the full querty keyboard in portrait and the stability of .100 all together for the next release
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
I'm not what you would call a power user.
A phone is not a lap top.
It does take acceptable pictures & videos.
Does SMS & email ok.
Rotation is better than .85
.100 works fine for me.
gonna dl it but so far .90 is good for me...after a few upsets...it's getting faster and no random reboot.
so is there the potrait qwerty with the .100?
I'm quite disappointed with .100, so far I have kept fairly up to date on Beta firmware and had few problems.
.100 has crashed on me several times and I've had to do a battery pull at least once. Never had a single crash with any other version!! I�ll continue to use .100 until the next release, let�s just hope RIM gets it right.
hi , my .100 is superfast. if i display sms or emails etc, if i spin they rotate superfast, no lag, pictures not too bad either. Battery is good and memory is very good. i jsut need screwdriver to adjust screws for typing and then sorted!