Originally Posted by
mikmooney A lot of people are upset feeling like they are being "nickel and dimed" for apps that should have been native on a touch screen phone, myself included. Things like being able to disable the acceleromator, lock the screen in a call, customize the LED, ring and vibrate, etc.
That got me thinking, did RIM do this on purpose? Let me explain...
RIM has known for awhile they were going to be coming out with App World and set up a payment structure where $2.99 was the lowest paid app. I believe it was mentioned on here that RIM gets a 20% cut of price of the app per sale. Even at $2.99 that means RIM is making .60 cents off each sale, adds up quckly...
Is it possible that RIM left out these features on purpose knowing that if the demand was high enough a third party developer would make the app and sell it through App World where RIM would make some extra money?
Maybe I'm just reading into it too deeply but I certainly find it plausible. I wanted to think that the developers at RIM were smarter than "forgetting" these features but then again the lack of a stable OS 6 months after release really isn't helping that agrument much...
What do you guys think?