Originally Posted by
kazinvan I see you didn't link to a CB post, so should I assume that this forum us useless? Forums have their place, and so do wikis.
No, I didn't say this forum is useless... See Forums can have discussions, thought process, etc. to backup and provide the basis for the information.
Originally Posted by
kazinvan "You have no control of what is added, who adds it, or how accurate it is."
Also, I just don't get your logic. You say the wiki is wrong but what makes you think all forum posts are going to be right? They are not, there is just as much incorrect information on the forum as there is on a wiki.
I'm not saying forums are 100% correct. Don't put words in my mouth!!
In a forum, people can jump in and say, hey that doesn't work the way you said or "that is not correct," and then discuss why it doesn't work, what happens, etc and arrive at the correct information. And everyone can see the entire discussion and thought process unfold.
Originally Posted by
kazinvan The wiki makes finding answers to common questions easier. What kind of control do you have in the forum? Users can reply with the correct information, but the same can be said of a wiki.
I just don't get your logic... the people looking at the wiki for these answers, generally are the ones who NEED the answer, therefore all they know is, they came to the wiki, the info on the wiki doesn't work, so then they'll just have to go hunting for the correct info anyway. How does that make it easier?
And they have no way to "speak up" and tell someone, or discuss what they find doesn't work..
Maybe the did a step wrong because they didn't understand, or maybe the steps are not correct... They wont know. This particular wiki doesn't have any references or sources cited.
This wiki appears to be down (I keep getting "500 - Internal Server Error"), so I can't see if there is a "Feed Back" link that at least someone could report something doesn't work...
Originally Posted by ddarvish
well mark, typically in a post if wrong information is posted it may be corrected several entries down or in some cases not for 10 or 15 pages later. who has time to read that much. on the wiki, the mistake is corrected and its good to go!
Again, on the Wiki, who is going to know when the information is incorrect in the first place and that it needs to be fixed? Who is going to take the time to go back and fix it?
Reading 10 or 15 "pages" later in a forum, they just might actually LEARN not only how something is done, but WHY its done which will help them more in the long run.
Originally Posted by ddarvish
BTW. it maybe true that someone grabbed those setup instructions from a post you made earlier, but they are still accurate if you are using the BIS website and leave the password blank.
Its not about someone grabbed what I posted... Its more about the instructions are NOT accurate for the Storm.
And the instructions do NOT mention visiting the BIS web site from a computer in any way... they talk about working on the BB itself. So how are they "still accurate" for the Storm?
If there is going to be some main "editor" or "moderator" of the Wiki that is going to make sure the information is accurate and valid, then heck yeah, It will be much more useful.
Originally Posted by kazinvan
Wikipedia is another good example. Do you think all the info there is bogus? Maybe a giant forum with threads for each topic would be better?
And tell me... what is at the bottom of every Wikipedia page?
Yup... SOURCES... where did the information on that page come from... links to the information that provided the basis and foundation for the information on that Wiki page to help provide a context and some sort of proof of the validity of the information.
Wikipedia does have some oversite and review of their information. Substandard or disputed information can/will be removed.
Its cool. I've said
MY opinion. I
SAID(in my first post in this thread) I commend your effort...
Good luck your wiki...