Another reason to choose the Storm over the iPhone
- New report from PC World:
The 3G networks of all four major U.S. wireless carriers deliver slower speeds than customers expect, according to Gartner Inc., which said it has received the most complaints about AT&T's network.
Redman singled out the iPhone 3G, sold exclusively by AT&T, saying it won't support downloads faster than 1.4Gbit/sec., while some laptop cards get 1.7Mbit/sec. "Companies shouldn't expect the fastest network speeds on the iPhone 3G," Redman said in the report.
Jeffrey Nelson, a spokesman for Verizon, said 3G speeds are "exactly as promised," and noted that business customers and consumers adopting laptop cards are using the faster speeds for music and video. "I guess the proof is in the customer usage numbers," Nelson said. "Data usage has increased to more than 26% of overall Verizon Wireless revenue, with more than half of that nonmessaging data."02-01-09 10:14 AMLike 0 -
-
- I Call BS on this.
3G does not work where I live. They say we have it, but at the most we have 3 bars, unless we go to the rural city below us, and then we have to be RIGHT next the tower to have full coverage.
I was just telling my friend the other night, we both have 3G phones, and are both not impressed by their "Coverage everywhere" slogan.02-03-09 02:24 PMLike 0 - Not to jump sides here either, but if i go to ATT.com and look for coverage in my area, its better then verizon. verizon's coverage ends only a few streets down from my house while ATT's coverage, covers the full block and then some.
I've thought about calling and telling them this. its stupid to pay 80 bucks a month for no service.02-03-09 02:36 PMLike 0 -
-
Keep in mind that 1.4 gigabits per second is actually 0.175 gigabytes per second (i.e. 175 megabytes per second) since there are 8 bits in a byte. 175 megabytes per second is the highest bandwidth available on the iPhone and it would be the download speed if the entire intracellular network was directed to one iPhone alone. But divide 175 megabytes per second among thousands of intracellular networks in the ATT coverage area and you'll understand why 1.4 gigabits per second is not that fast. When you reduce the maximum bandwidth in the pipeline it slows everyone up, much like a clogged drain.Last edited by mdude85; 02-03-09 at 02:51 PM.
02-03-09 02:48 PMLike 0 - Keep in mind that 1.4 gigabits per second is actually 0.175 gigabytes per second (i.e. 175 megabytes per second) since there are 8 bits in a byte. Now divide 175 megabytes per second among thousands of intracellular networks in the ATT coverage area and you'll understand why 1.4 gigabits per second is not that fast.02-03-09 02:50 PMLike 0
-
By your logic, the entire 3G network is sharing 1.4Gb/s (.1879 GB/s). So (again, by your division logic), if there are 2,000,000 people sharing 187.9 MB/s, each phone will get about 94 bytes per second.
Yeah, I guess they really DO have reason to complain.02-03-09 03:36 PMLike 0 - It doesn't really work that way since 2 million people would not share .175 GB/sec equally. By using the word "divide" I insinuated that the bandwidth was divided but not necessarily divided equally among all the users in the band. It's not really too big of an issue because the actual bandwidth is never as high as advertized or measured. Basically the issue comes in only for enterprise users since a lot of companies have to decide whether to outfit their employees with laptop (air) cards or with iPhones. Since the iPhone restricts bandwidth compared to air cards then it might not be the best choice, especially for high bandwidth scenarios like secure/class (classified) RDP. Not that you would use an iPhone for a class RDP anyway since the class networks like some in the US government don't typically support iPhones for enterprise. The article is just making the point that users are experiencing poor download speeds on the iPhone and its restriction on max bandwidth draw from the network may be a contributing factor. I'm not so sure how much of a role it really plays but it's worth mentioning I think.
Last edited by mdude85; 02-03-09 at 03:51 PM.
02-03-09 03:46 PMLike 0 - It doesn't really work that way since 2 million people would not share .175 GB/sec equally. By using the word "divide" I insinuated that the bandwidth was divided but not necessarily divided equally among all the users in the band. It's not really too big of an issue because the actual bandwidth is never as high as advertized or measured. Basically the issue comes in only for enterprise users since a lot of companies have to decide whether to outfit their employees with laptop (air) cards or with iPhones. Since the iPhone restricts bandwidth compared to air cards then it might not be the best choice, especially for high bandwidth scenarios like secure/class (classified) RDP. Not that you would use an iPhone for a class RDP anyway since the class networks like some in the US government don't typically support iPhones for enterprise.02-03-09 03:51 PMLike 0
-
I think regardless of typos, it would be interesting to see how the maximum bandwidth restriction on the iPhone, if there is one, affects WiFi rather than 3G, especially since 3G will be phased out soon.02-03-09 03:54 PMLike 0 - Well, I was correct that 1.4 gigabits per second is 8 times higher than 1.4 gigabytes per second. Merely because the article made a typo does not mean that I am somewhat incorrect. Perhaps you mean to say that the article is somewhat incorrect.
I think regardless of typos, it would be interesting to see how the maximum bandwidth restriction on the iPhone, if there is one, affects WiFi rather than 3G, especially since 3G will be phased out soon.02-03-09 04:10 PMLike 0
- Forum
- BlackBerry OS Phone Forums
- More BlackBerry Phones
- BlackBerry Storm Series
Another reason to choose the Storm over the iPhone
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD