[cbvinh]

The failing in all of this..... BlackBerry should know this and put in better specs for better sales. But i bet, since BlackBerry doesn't want to sell consumer phones, they dropped the camera specs because they know most people using phones for business aren't taking duck face selfies at staff meetings.

They didn't skimp on the back camera though. It's comparable with other flagships in terms of MP. For the front, perhaps they should have put a crappy 5 MP camera (same cost as the present 2 MP) and people will buy and just be annoyed.

[BriniaSona]

Network
• FD-LTE 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 20, 29,30
• HSPA+ 1, 2, 4, 5/6, 8

These are the bands for the Canadian model. Will it work on wind?

[John Vieira]

Network
• FD-LTE 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 20, 29,30
• HSPA+ 1, 2, 4, 5/6, 8

These are the bands for the Canadian model. Will it work on wind?

According to those, yes. But 950 is too rich for my blood.

Sent from my HUAWEI G7-L03 using Tapatalk

[BriniaSona]

According to those, yes. But 950 is too rich for my blood.

Sent from my HUAWEI G7-L03 using Tapatalk

if Rogers stick with 799, I'm buying it from them.

[Omnitech]

They didn't skimp on the back camera though. It's comparable with other flagships in terms of MP. For the front, perhaps they should have put a crappy 5 MP camera (same cost as the present 2 MP) and people will buy and just be annoyed.

Agreed.

When people rail on-and-on about MP without discussing any other aspect of camera performance, it's a pretty good bet they have little idea of what actually distinguishes a good camera from a bad or mediocre one.

[ssbtech]

It's not the wallpaper. Here is the wallpaper being used on my phone. No white bars whatsoever.

Those folder icons - on BB10, it shows the first 4 icons in the folder in a 2x2 grid on the icon. On that Android screenshot, the icons are stacked, making it impossible to see what's behind the first one. Look at the "News" icon - all you see is CNN.

Is there an option to change that to a 2x2 layout instead of stacked?

[anon(9154563)]

Apple has some great marketing. They've been able to get away with releasing lower MP cameras (along with other lower specs) because they have a million commercials telling you how great their camera is. Posted via CB10

This is not true. Two years of possessing and using a stationary device from Apple house (the first device of that brand in our environment), been forced to be in contact with their's arrogant and incompetent service do result in quite opposite effect >> everything but not theirs product, as facts true for some domain like to transit to other one. Anyhow and unfortunately, current iPhone is the only model convincing me due to the number of supported radio bands. Had the questionable pleasure to get abandoned by Android camp's device in an elementary question, compatibility with infrastructure in region of my stay. Smartphone's as digital personal assistant main job is to serve the Lord in its all elementary and major functions, everywhere the service is needed. Radio connection is such function.
Sure even 6S with its about 25 (do not remember exact number) LTE bands is far from covering all possible bands to be met world wide. Anyhow it beats every other a lot in this aspect. Wouldn't be this one capability I would be miles far from the plan to get 6S. Waiting for suitable build from BB house since development start of Z30. All for nothing, every year a flagship with disqualifying property, poor battery life, then exotic format and poor or unclear situation regarding apps support, finally the disqualified 'droid with its level of productivity disablement. Can't longer wait. The foolish phone wants a replacement. To be honest not sure how would priv with BB help now (as much a lot of hope well-wishing was put in this brand last years), perspective of future are not convincing (how long do the brand will live, how long will devices live, how good will be 'droid maintenance). A pity!

[Phill_UK]

Google Translate?