-
Just tried the Daily Mail website, seems perfectly smooth, took a bit of time loading but is quite image heavy so not unexpected.
Not subscribed to The Times so can't test that (very amused by the idea of The London Times, never heard it called that before, fairly sure it's old enough to have nabbed exclusivity on just The Times
)04-05-12 06:23 PM - Hi gtpointer, thanks for testing the Daily Mail site. The homepage took around 60 seconds to fully load this morning and subsidiary pages around the same time. Is this your experience?Just tried the Daily Mail website, seems perfectly smooth, took a bit of time loading but is quite image heavy so not unexpected.
Not subscribed to The Times so can't test that (very amused by the idea of The London Times, never heard it called that before, fairly sure it's old enough to have nabbed exclusivity on just The Times)
As regards the phrase "London Times", I agree that it does sound strange to UK ears. I chose to refer to it that way as I am aware that there are many newspapers around the world which use the "Times" appellation and that Crackberry has a global user base. It would be nice to think that, by now, The Thunderer would have first call on the name.04-09-12 01:29 AM -
That's ok, DM didn't take as long as 60 seconds to load, 20 seconds at most I think. Have you tried clearing your cookies/cache to see if that helps sort it out?
I understood why you said the London Times don't worry, just threw me, began to wonder if its official name was the London Times and it was something I'd been missing04-10-12 07:09 PM
