A CNET article posted June 9 claim the editor cannot duplicate a screen fail despite dropping and prying on screen.
Clearly more to follow.
Printable View
A CNET article posted June 9 claim the editor cannot duplicate a screen fail despite dropping and prying on screen.
Clearly more to follow.
The article I see says they did duplicate it. However as per their quote below, it did take a lot.
"After dropping the phone ten different times on carpet and then on wood, and bending it forcibly four times, the screen did pop off as seen above."
Link?
"CNET editor Roger Cheng also has the phone, and said he can't replicate the problem with a bend test or prying off the display."
Not exactly accurate - even the link says so....
"BlackBerry KeyOne screen pops right off during bend test
According to tests by CNET and others, the new phone's screen doesn't seem as durable as it could be."
https://www.cnet.com/news/blackberry...ing-bend-test/
Looks like no adhesive there either
Is there another article? I don't see this anywhere in this one:
https://www.cnet.com/news/blackberry...ing-bend-test/
No, I didn't see that section either when I looked for the the one that is live now. In addition, he didn't post a link to the quote.
That is no longer there for me since the article was updated.
Yes, it would seem this section was conveniently dropped. Interesting.
Yes. They did say it took 10 dropped and 4 forceful bends for it to pop off though. Seems like over kill to replicate it.
On another note, CNET still doesn't have a full review with a star rating a month after they received the phone.