1. kcmo's Avatar
    Guys/Gals,

    I've been out of the loop since I first tried T-Mobile's 8900 back in Feb when it came out. I tried 2, had issues with both, and returned them and went back to my 8320.

    I recall 2 issues with the OS at the time....
    1) battery strength was weak (I'd get a day with medium usage)
    2) vibrate mode was weak (the phone would sit on my desk inches from me and I'd miss notifications because I didn't even hear the vibe)

    I'm still pretty happy with my 8320 (runs OS v4.5.0.81) but am wondering if there have been improvements to the 8900 OS since I tried it on day one. I want to say my 8900 was running .114 but my memory only goes back so far!

    Thanks!
    08-25-09 07:22 PM
  2. aristile's Avatar
    Yep, the newer version of the OS are MUCH better than .114 was. That OS did have problems.
    08-25-09 07:36 PM
  3. fatboy97's Avatar
    Yes, .114 was a bad on both battery life and vibration, as well as ringtone volume... currently T-Mobile's Official OS is .231.
    08-25-09 07:38 PM
  4. kcmo's Avatar
    Great! So .231 addresses both the battery life and vibe strength?
    08-25-09 08:09 PM
  5. fatboy97's Avatar
    Great! So .231 addresses both the battery life and vibe strength?
    That's what we both said.
    08-25-09 08:11 PM
  6. kcmo's Avatar
    Thanks again!
    08-25-09 08:13 PM
  7. lavinci's Avatar
    .231 is the best so far.
    08-25-09 10:25 PM
  8. ARich91's Avatar
    .231 is the best so far.
    .250 is really good too. I haven't really noticed any differences between .231 and .250
    08-25-09 11:25 PM
  9. pikelon's Avatar
    I was running .250 and I know a lot of ppl not having any issues w it but in my case I started having some problems with my sms and mms so downgrade to .231 and no problems so far. I would go back to the 8900 if I was u.

    Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
    08-26-09 12:55 AM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD