My Q10 has been in the drawer since replacing it with PassPort as a "surfing phablet". My firm doesn't consider devices lacking physical "end" key to be a phone. Myself included. Long story.
Classic is our go-to device with many of us carrying 9900's as "security blankets". NO confusion once, like any device, you accept it for what it is and learn to optimize your use with its characteristics. Options are GOOD! :)
BBRY's current lack of toolbelt experience is, sadly, expected. Hold a 9900 in one hand and a Z30 in the other hand and convince yourself they were made by the same company. It could be argued they are not the same company. BBRY is a NEW company. BB10 is a NEW OS. For better AND worse.
I, personally, believe BB10 was built ground up by developers who had never used BBOS. I, personally, could TOO easily believe they'd NEVER designed a smartphone before. As a matter of fact, what smartphone experience did QNX have? Smartphones are not car stereos... lol.
Too many "simple" features had to wait long waits to get implemented into BB10. Toolbelt was, obviously, an insurmountable challenge to implement on Q10 by launch. Much easier to meet scheduling goals by simply marketing lack of TB as a "feature". Hence, we got what we got. For better AND worse. AFAIK, Q10 sales didn't exactly crush 9900 sales.
BB10 is maturing in front of our eyes and Classic's toolbelt, imperfect as it is, makes it the BEST BB10 device to date, IMO. I'm thrilled with mine, as is, while eagerly awaiting BB10's maturity! :)