[Ray III]

Well, you can calculate the size difference. A 3.5" screen diagonal would only be like 7mm wider and taller than the current 3.1" screen. Which is like .28" wider and taller. It's not THAT much of a difference. You'll notice it visually, but unless your pockets are so small that the Q10 just barely squeezes in there now, it won't be a problem. I guess if you wore girl skinny jeans maybe, but normal pockets fit the phone with plenty of room to spare.

Posted without the aid of AutoCorrect with my physical keyboard via CB10

Oh, for some reason I thought smartphone screens were measured in height. 3.5" diagonal isn't bad.

[slagman5]

Oh, for some reason I thought smartphone screens were measured in height. 3.5" diagonal isn't bad.

Any and all screen measurements are diagonal dimensions. :-)

Posted without the aid of AutoCorrect with my physical keyboard via CB10

[Joe Clean]

I voted Q20, but that's really contingent on how the device turns out. I'm particularly worried about these rumors of a 3.5" screen, it really needs to be the same size as the Q10/9900 (elongated for the trackpad of course) or it's probably not going to fit in my pocket.

Elongated screen sounds about right for modern Q-series, that's if BlackBerry decided to keep the "belt" in it.

[Joe Clean]

Voted for Q20, actually looking for a Q10 to replace my Z10 now. Unfortunately prices are still quite high even on eBay. Not bad prices if I weren't retired, no overtime any more.

But if the Q20 is out, its price will probabl quite high too, then perhaps you'll find a cheaper Q10.