i like this thread, what a brilliant idea! will be sure to take some photos and put some up soon
regarding people who decide to tell us their camera phones are better (i.e. iphones) why not post that on an iphone forum? i'm sure your comments will be greatly appreciated there we love our blackberrys here and nothing aint got change that. (sounds like some sort of song!)
Actually it is. I mean the Bugatti Veyron base model has 1001 horsepower. Plus people drive around modded Nissan GT-Rs with close to 800 horsepower and the like. It drives fine on the street, but is meant for a track. And he does take it to the track on occasion, which is pretty awesome. Haha
it can't be in Canada then - or am I way off the mark. I used to own a '69 GTO with 400 CI 350 HP and a 66 GTO with 450 CI 400 HP and that was awfully damn fast. Of course it was many years ago. (smile)
Anyway interesting to know. Thanks
I'm quite a few things - a die hard BlackBerry fan, an engineer, a weather broadcaster - so I use my phone to take a wide variety of photos. The 9900 has not let me down in this regard.
I've attached 10 everyday photos that I've taken with my 9900. Spending a day with the family, travel, work, and nature. These photos are taken indoors, outdoors, in low lighting (one is at night), directly in the sun, etc.
There's nothing wrong with this camera, see for your self...
I have a 9700 Bold and am seriously considering the 9900 for a few specific reasons. However the auto focus feature is a huge plus for me with the 9700. I am to the point now that I have zero need for a camera as I have taken well over 3000 incredible pictures while I have been living and traveling here in Thailand. The auto focus feature is extremely nice when you want to point and shoot up close. The pictures I have seen posted in this thread are very nice but how about close ups, night time or with questionable lighting.
I have a 9700 Bold and am seriously considering the 9900 for a few specific reasons. However the auto focus feature is a huge plus for me with the 9700. I am to the point now that I have zero need for a camera as I have taken well over 3000 incredible pictures while I have been living and traveling here in Thailand. The auto focus feature is extremely nice when you want to point and shoot up close. The pictures I have seen posted in this thread are very nice but how about close ups, night time or with questionable lighting.
Thanks
EDOF cameras just need time to be mastered. I have already mastered mine on my 9900 including the two DSC's I use and one jammed fujifilm 4mp camera, which is now EDOF, as it will not focus anymore if zoomed in.
I have a 9700 Bold and am seriously considering the 9900 for a few specific reasons. However the auto focus feature is a huge plus for me with the 9700. I am to the point now that I have zero need for a camera as I have taken well over 3000 incredible pictures while I have been living and traveling here in Thailand. The auto focus feature is extremely nice when you want to point and shoot up close. The pictures I have seen posted in this thread are very nice but how about close ups, night time or with questionable lighting.
Thanks
Closeups are not that good, night time pics are amazing with the 9900, it captures so much light. Lack of autofocus also let's you capture amazing action shots.
If closeups are important I would advise against it.
So I was visiting my brother in Southampton recently and I took a walk down to the marina and some lovely boats were there... Had to resize them to be internet friendly though...
Closeups are not that good, night time pics are amazing with the 9900, it captures so much light. Lack of autofocus also let's you capture amazing action shots.
If closeups are important I would advise against it.
Exactly my thoughts. I came from a 9700 before switching to 9900.