- You guys put way way to much emphasis on clock speed of the processor. RIM processors may be lower on clock speed but perform comparable to andriod devices in the same class of phone. Numbers are just what they are numbers. It all depends on how the device performs. My 9700 performs equal comapred to other high end android phones with 1gh processors. But I agree the new RIM devices should have faster processors, just dont put numbers on them. "They must be 1gh" that is nonsense. Apple processors are histroically much lower in clock speed than PC's but perform equally and better in many cases.10-08-10 05:10 AMLike 0
-
- processor speed or available RAM is not just #s! SMH!!! Do you enjoy seeing your hour glass go round and round when you either maxed out of ram or have too many processes opened at the same time???? Well guess what? That is a direct result of those numbers that some people seem to think dont matter!10-08-10 08:51 AMLike 0
-
- processor speed or available RAM is not just #s! SMH!!! Do you enjoy seeing your hour glass go round and round when you either maxed out of ram or have too many processes opened at the same time???? Well guess what? That is a direct result of those numbers that some people seem to think dont matter!
And don't forget that well written software can improve speed dramatically. Look no further than the Torch 9800 OS 6.0.0.246 for a recent example.
Similarly, people seem to think that more megapixels = better camera. But without good optics (i.e., Nokia), all you get is a high resolution copy of a distorted image.10-08-10 09:03 AMLike 0 - If it was that simple, everybody would be an electrical engineer. Clock speed is only one of many design details that determine how fast that a microprocessor can perform. How are graphics processed? Are there parallel processors? What functions are done in hardware? How fast are internal data buses? How fast is memory? etc.
And don't forget that well written software can improve speed dramatically. Look no further than the Torch 9800 OS 6.0.0.246 for a recent example.
Similarly, people seem to think that more megapixels = better camera. But without good optics (i.e., Nokia), all you get is a high resolution copy of a distorted image.Last edited by RicanMedic78; 10-08-10 at 09:21 AM.
10-08-10 09:14 AMLike 0 - and when it comes to loading apps and app memory, lets not forget something crucial here... When a BB user loads his or her 256mb device will apps, be it paid or free, then upgrades to a 512mb device, that only gives the user 256 more to play with. Cause lets be honest here... odds are that the apps on your first device are getting transferred to your new device once you switch! 256mb "extra" in the smart phone world is enough to hold a BB user for just a few months before you start seeing the continuous hour glass issues and start having to pick and choose again which apps you may need to delete in order to have another more useful app. So at the end of the day, SPECS DO COUNT!10-08-10 09:29 AMLike 0
- and when it comes to loading apps and app memory, lets not forget something crucial here... When a BB user loads his or her 256mb device will apps, be it paid or free, then upgrades to a 512mb device, that only gives the user 256 more to play with. Cause lets be honest here... odds are that the apps on your first device are getting transferred to your new device once you switch! 256mb "extra" in the smart phone world is enough to hold a BB user for just a few months before you start seeing the continuous hour glass issues and start having to pick and choose again which apps you may need to delete in order to have another more useful app. So at the end of the day, SPECS DO COUNT!
And I agree that RIM needs to step it up, but I don't want a big screen and fast microprocessor at the expense of call quality and battery life. These trade-offs may be acceptable for casual / entertainment users (i.e., Android, iPhone), but I rely on my smart phone for business, so the fundamentals *must* be solid.10-08-10 09:41 AMLike 0 - Of course specs count. My point is that you shouldn't be fooled into thinking one number can describe overall performance. My new laptop has a 2.5 GHz clock speed and my 7 year old desktop has a 3 GHz clock speed, but the laptop runs circles around the desktop in terms of performance.
And I agree that RIM needs to step it up, but I don't want a big screen and fast microprocessor at the expense of call quality and battery life. These trade-offs may be acceptable for casual / entertainment users (i.e., Android, iPhone), but I rely on my smart phone for business, so the fundamentals *must* be solid.
But the frustrations of crackberrians is so loud that we just scream "SPECS" across the board10-08-10 10:02 AMLike 0 - But they wont. Because they'd rather focus on making rehashes of phones they already have put out, and pieces of junk like the style.10-08-10 11:41 AMLike 0
- processor speed or available RAM is not just #s! SMH!!! Do you enjoy seeing your hour glass go round and round when you either maxed out of ram or have too many processes opened at the same time???? Well guess what? That is a direct result of those numbers that some people seem to think dont matter!
My 9700 bold runs apps and everything I need it to as fast as the droid incredible I owned for 3 weeks. I wont go back to another android phone anytime soon. IMHO as a communication device BB is king, android dont come close yet.10-08-10 04:04 PMLike 0 - I noticed that you conveniently left out the 1.2 GHz processor, 512MB of RAM and on-board storage of 2GB that has room for 32GB of expandable microSD storage (Think Apps2SD), 7.2 hours of talk time, and support for Flash. But, I guess those don't count.10-08-10 04:12 PMLike 0
- 10-08-10 08:15 PMLike 0
- I admit, those are impressive specs. I just don't understand why Moto went cheap on the screen and the track pad.10-09-10 12:22 PMLike 0
- where the heck is this thing?! the 9700 is NOT a bold device. it should have been a completely different series IMO.10-09-10 08:26 PMLike 0
- I Never thought i would say this... but the 9670 is the only blackberry that i didn't like, I think i would stick with my curve rather than that10-09-10 08:50 PMLike 0
- I really hope the trackpad stays... selecting small links, or copying small text is MUCH easier with a trackpad than your finger, imo
I really REALLY want my next BB to have the keyboard size of the 9000. Us guys with bigger hands really appreciate that extra little bit of size.
I doubt if it is an accident that a Canadian company usually includes this capability when those companies from California typically do not.10-17-10 01:02 PMLike 0 - I have taken the liberty of modifying the image to add a trackpad. With the keyboard from the Curve, the trackpad and touch screen from the Torch, and the candybar form factor, this would be an incredible smartphone. Add a powerful processor with more memory and a high resolution screen (at least 480x640 VGA), and I think this would steal the market from the Droid Pro.
Last edited by Bob G; 10-17-10 at 02:06 PM.
10-17-10 02:02 PMLike 0 -
But with the release of the Torch I'd like to see on Verizon something similar or the Dakota/Magnum/whatever...If vz goes with a Torch-like device, it better be LTE-ready and with a higher res screen and faster processor! C'mon, RIM, focus!10-18-10 12:01 PMLike 0 -
But I also am hoping for the Dakota at the top end.10-18-10 12:35 PMLike 0
- Forum
- BlackBerry OS Phone Forums
- BlackBerry Bold Series
Where is the Dakota/Magnum?
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD