Printable View
I was just wondering if anyone new if the AT&T version of the 9900 is any different then the other versions on t-mobile, sprint, verizon. Other then the obvious CDMA vs GSM.
I was wondering if the almost 3 month delay had anything to do with all the issues I keep reading about in these post. I am hoping that the OS or hardware is more reliable than the previous releases on the other carriers.
I don't believe so. There was talk of a last minute hardware upgrade, but this was overcome with a software update.
I hope the software update will be less buggy than the ones that are listed in the other posts. You would think so since we are now almost 3 months behind the first launch.
AFAIK the AT&T 9900 will ship with .440 which is running fine on my phone.
It seems like no sig hardware stuff was changed...
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
There was one hardware revision required, as well as a firmware revision, however we do not know what either of those entailed.
NFC is probably missing.
I doubt it'll be any different to the eyes. Maybe a little correction but we won't be able to tell.
Sent from my BlackBerry 9930 using Tapatalk
yea from what i saw, there was a hardware and software changes made to both the 9900 and the 9860 but no one is telling us what those changes were, other than it will release with .440.
I believe AT&T have disabled the NFC option in the handset. Then again I maybe wrong.
Yes there are 2 versions of 9900. The atnt/roger/bell one is 3g plus H+ and can go upto speed of 4g where the aws version which runs on t-mobile/wind/moblicty is just 3g so it runs barely 3g speed,*wind and moblicty hve very slow data so max it goes is 180kbps. Worst than rogers EDGE (which is none data plan).