[abrblo]

I am disappointed with camera quality of z10 100-1 model. Camera on 100-2 is far better in terms of quality and colour. Why so much of difference?
Is stl100-1 a low quality product?

Posted via CB10

[eldricho]

Afaik they use the same types of cameras
Haven't seen anyone complain about camera quality between the two
Are both on the same os version?

Posted via CB10

[abrblo]

Both working on same os. Pictures taken by 100-1 are quite dark and low on colours. Pictures taken by 100-2 are brighter and good colurs. Both are clicked together. There is a huge difference.

Posted via CB10

[FrankIAm]

Both working on same os. Pictures taken by 100-1 are quite dark and low on colours. Pictures taken by 100-2 are brighter and good colurs. Both are clicked together. There is a huge difference.

Posted via CB10

You should post them

[The Big Picture]

Post em!

Q10SQN100-3/10.2.1.2228, Z30, Z10, iP5, SGS3

[bubbbab]

Also never heard of that. There are a few settings that might alter that so making sure settings are identical is a good idea and of course OSs the same and either both official or both leaked. I suppose there may be minute differences in each camera but not likely the phone model as much as it is simple tolerances in manufacturing of camera modules. This should be hard to detect visually. Do you have any image related apps on one and not the other? Either one have a drop where the other didn't? Clean lens on both? Are there cases on them? Both same? Are these flash or non flash pictures and have you tried the opposite? Can't think of any bother questions.

The Z10's camera I rate as 'ok'. Son's iP5 and iPad kill it. 100-3. Hey its a lens smaller than a baby's pinkie.

Post via BlackBerry ZedAche 10.2.1.2102 (2141)

[dustmalik]

The OP is right. I have an STL 100-1 myself, so I can confirm what the OP said.

Posted via CB10 using my Gorgeous Z10

[sinlessearth]

Is it the picture that is different or the screen. Take both pictures and look at them together on the same computer monitor. Are they different?

[ronfc]

Both models should have the same part number for the camera and technically should function the same. Differences in the photos doesn't mean it's all the camera's fault. There are lots of variables.

Cave, cave, moderator videt

[TrueKulcha]

Both models should have the same part number for the camera and technically should function the same. Differences in the photos doesn't mean it's all the camera's fault. There are lots of variables.

Cave, cave, moderator videt

Sometimes manufacturer tolerances or even the batch they came out from can make a small difference. Simple OS update version can also make quite a different with these things so you are so right about variables in general. Lighting conditions, camera angles, settings and all. Like one person who responded also suggested, we can take the photos and look at them on same computer screen to get a better judgment.

Posted via CB10

[kbz1960]

Are the pics taken by the same person with the same settings and all?

[abrblo]

Stl 100-1



Stl 100-2

Both photos at same setting..same os

Posted via CB10

[badiyee]

Ooh stl-2 looks warmer. Flash quality?

Posted via CB10

[ronfc]

Can you do the comparison in a well-lit area?

Cave, cave, moderator videt

[abrblo]

Its about the colours. 100-1 photos are less colourful in any condition.

Posted via CB10

[abrblo]

Dont know if its because of flash or something else but it makes difference. Stl 100-1 photos look less natural

Posted via CB10

[anon(4243545)]

In my opinion the 100-1 seems more natural (even if a little too bright) than 100-2, whose colors seems to much "sepia". However, the only difference between 100-1 and 100-2 are CPU and GPU (if I remember correctly, 100-1 has a slightly better CPU and 100-2 a slightly better GPU) and Miracast (included in 100-2 but disabled): cameras are identical. The problem is surely the firmware version (check if they are the same) and maybe different settings or the flash itself.

[Punzalan Flores Kerouac]

can you do it on outside with the trees?

posted via CB10 on z10

[goku_vegeta]

In my opinion the 100-1 seems more natural (even if a little too bright) than 100-2, whose colors seems to much "sepia". However, the only difference between 100-1 and 100-2 are CPU and GPU (if I remember correctly, 100-1 has a slightly better CPU and 100-2 a slightly better GPU) and Miracast (included in 100-2 but disabled): cameras are identical. The problem is surely the firmware version (check if they are the same) and maybe different settings or the flash itself.

Included in STL100-1 yes.

Posted via CB10

[badiyee]

Try in a well lit area. Or broad day sunlight. Because the one you took was in a dim area with flash, so maybe the flash component is differrent?

Posted via CB10

[ronfc]

Try in a well lit area. Or broad day sunlight. Because the one you took was in a dim area with flash, so maybe the flash component is differrent?

Posted via CB10

+1

Cave, cave, moderator videt

[bb10_fan]

Looks like 100-2 has some problems with White Balance, it's shifted towards warm colors. To me, 100-1 looks better, even if colors are slightly washed out, but that could be due to use of flash

[LostOnThePianoRoll]

The stl100-1 photo seems brighter.. either way both problems with colours or brightness can easily be fixed with the photo editor in less than 10 seconds

Posted via CB10 on my Z10STL100-10.2.1.2102