-
Posted via CB1008-04-17 07:35 AMLike 0 -
-
- There are websites like zapier that automate workflows, but unfortunately BB10's browser won't browse zapier very well. I think if it could, BB10 might work a lot better.08-04-17 10:01 AMLike 0
- Drivers are the least of it at this point. The latest SOC that BB10 will run on, the Snapdragon 801, is 3 years old and not even 64-bit. There would be a ton of work to do to make it even boot on currently available hardware.08-04-17 10:14 AMLike 0
-
So they should have the knowledge inside of the house.
The main problem is that BlackBerry is not able to put their products in the market. So if they do somethin good or bad, they will not go to profits.
But there are many cheap cost companies with cheap workforce which could perfect allies, and could find a market for a non android thingy.
And about a technologies Jolla/sailfish should be another good partner.
When you are a small one go to the war alone is a suicide
Posted via CB10anon(8679041) likes this.08-05-17 06:29 AMLike 1 - Perhaps you should do some Googling and investigate the many previous attempts at crowdsourcing the development of niche OS smartphones. It should also be kept in mind that all of those projects were based on open-source OSs, which BB10 is not. Absolutely nothing can be done to BB10 without access to source code and without BB's signing keys - in other words, you'd need BB's full support or no amount of money would matter.
Why millions?
Say two developers only would work 8hr/day only on developing BB OS. That's around $200k a year. Aren't two developers enough to launch 2 updates within a year?
And then they could outsource that work in other countries with lower wages. In some countries a senior developer gets even $4k a month (not kidding, this is why a lot of companies do outsourcing)!
*This does NOT include the marketing, sales, distribution, component management, HR, or other departments. That was just BB10 OS and app development, testing, and management of that division.StephanieMaks and glwerry like this.08-05-17 05:17 PMLike 2 - Why did BB employ a software development team for BB10 of 3400 people* to get BB10 developed in the first place if 4 guys in India could do it? Is it possible that maybe it's far, FAR more complex than you imagine?
*This does NOT include the marketing, sales, distribution, component management, HR, or other departments. That was just BB10 OS and app development, testing, and management of that division.08-07-17 04:49 AMLike 0 - Why did BB employ a software development team for BB10 of 3400 people* to get BB10 developed in the first place if 4 guys in India could do it? Is it possible that maybe it's far, FAR more complex than you imagine?
*This does NOT include the marketing, sales, distribution, component management, HR, or other departments. That was just BB10 OS and app development, testing, and management of that division.08-08-17 05:28 AMLike 0 - We are not talking here about re-constructing BB OS from scratch with 4k people. Just few updates, improvements and I think one year is more than enough for two experimented BB developers to release two updates within a year, by testing and doing all that work themselves. Not saying HUGE updates. But any updates as they are tested and completed. They could also break them down into small updates, like fixed this bug, that bug, added this small function. And in time we will get somewhere, rather then staying still.08-08-17 06:04 AMLike 0
-
And as in many things the cheapest choice becomes the most expensive.
A couple of developer can keep some value in the huge investment however a completed outdated OS cost nothing.
Posted via CB10anon(8679041) likes this.08-08-17 07:08 AMLike 1 -
- Someone has to develop drivers for KEYone.
Name an operating system team in the world that has 2 developers on it. Even Fire, which is based on AOSP and Linux and didn't have to SoC drivers, still had hundreds of people on it.
Also, even junior developers do not cost $100k. People forget about payroll taxes (which are sizable in Canada) and benefits and other overhead.
The math did not add up for BB last year or the year before or the year before that. Why would it suddenly work this year? What exactly has changed?Troy Tiscareno likes this.08-08-17 11:37 AMLike 1 -
Posted via CB10 / AT&T /Z10 STL100-3 /10.3.3.2205Troy Tiscareno likes this.08-08-17 04:00 PMLike 1 - I' d call it 'short vision', 'lack of respect for users', '2 parameter formula'...
And as in many things the cheapest choice becomes the most expensive.
A couple of developer can keep some value in the huge investment however a completed outdated OS cost nothing.
Posted via CB1008-08-17 04:36 PMLike 0 -
- We are not talking here about re-constructing BB OS from scratch with 4k people. Just few updates, improvements and I think one year is more than enough for two experimented BB developers to release two updates within a year, by testing and doing all that work themselves. Not saying HUGE updates. But any updates as they are tested and completed. They could also break them down into small updates, like fixed this bug, that bug, added this small function. And in time we will get somewhere, rather then staying still.
Somehow, you introduced a bug that breaks MMS - who is your MMS expert? Oh, don't have one. Who knows everything there is to know about cellular radios? Who knows the ins-and-outs of external storage encryption? Who can answer your questions about display driver optimization, or web encryption standards, or a million other things?
Developers aren't interchangeable - just like you can't replace Michelangelo with a random art student - or even a skilled landscape artist. It takes years and years to learn a specific niche and be great at it, and smartphones have a TON of niches, each one requiring very deep knowledge - and they must all play together perfectly or things go sideways VERY quickly.
I don't mean to offend you, but it's quite clear that you have no idea how complicated all this is, and how vital it is that you have a whole TEAM of people - including a LOT of world-class experts, who could command high salaries at dozens of other companies - to do this kind of work. And then, on top of that, we're talking about BB10, which is built on top of QNX, which isn't especially common in the industry, and that means that far fewer people know enough about it to be experts.
None of this matters anyway, because it's never, ever going to happen, but you really need to come to grips with the fact that you aren't going to take 2 or 4 guys and create any kind of relevant, competent updates to something as complex as BB10 unless they've all been working on it for years - and those guys are virtually all gone already.anon(8679041) and kvndoom like this.08-08-17 10:23 PMLike 2 - I' d call it 'short vision', 'lack of respect for users', '2 parameter formula'...
And as in many things the cheapest choice becomes the most expensive.
A couple of developer can keep some value in the huge investment however a completed outdated OS cost nothing.
Posted via CB10
As someone who manages a multi tens of millions enterprise software division I can tell everyone their estimates for a BB10 update beyond just a few bug fixes and security update is way off.
First the work would have to be done in NA. Offshoring OS work would be massive. I don't believe BlackBerry has ever done any software development in low cost locations like India. I manage several hundred developers in India. The legal and business setup process is long and complicated. If BlackBerry started now they might have a minor buggy update in two years.
An update to change core OS functionality like a complete Web replacement and associated work would at minimum take a team of ten engineers and 5 to 8 testers. Then add on development, project and product management, plus, operations, facilities, hardware and IT support. Total cost including salary, benefits and employment taxes and the annual cost is at a minimum 2.5 million.
I know my estimate is low, I have not added in the cost of recruiting all of these new employees. Now add in the time it will take them to learn how to work on the BB10 code. All of this work for what an update for 3+ year old phones?app_Developer and StephanieMaks like this.08-08-17 11:36 PMLike 2 -
An update to change core OS functionality like a complete Web replacement and associated work would at minimum take a team of ten engineers and 5 to 8 testers. Then add on development, project and product management, plus, operations, facilities, hardware and IT support. Total cost including salary, benefits and employment taxes and the annual cost is at a minimum 2.5 million.
I know my estimate is low, I have not added in the cost of recruiting all of these new employees. Now add in the time it will take them to learn how to work on the BB10 code. All of this work for what an update for 3+ year old phones?
To add to what you said, the next question is who would even take these jobs. "A" players are not going to take a job that is all about producing minor updates to an OS that only a handful of people use. That job description will almost certainly attract C level talent which will then drive the actual costs even higher.
Retention/churn is another factor.StephanieMaks likes this.08-09-17 02:58 AMLike 1 - Now everything is expensive but BlackBerry should think about all these facts when they decide to integrate so deep a fork of webkit and keep the source code closed.
In conclusion it is a proof of what happen to users who chose companies based in no open source licenses....
Posted via CB1008-11-17 05:11 AMLike 0 - Yeah, like you said the actual cost will be higher when all is said and done.
To add to what you said, the next question is who would even take these jobs. "A" players are not going to take a job that is all about producing minor updates to an OS that only a handful of people use. That job description will almost certainly attract C level talent which will then drive the actual costs even higher.
Retention/churn is another factor.09-29-17 03:28 AMLike 0 - For those who don't know what Progressive Web Apps (PWA) are, take a look at these videos:
short video ( )
longer video ( )
I know this is smth relatively new, not much information on the web yet, but maybe there are someone who could answer some questions here for us, for those who really won't let BB10 go away.
The questions I have would be:
1) Does BlackBerry OS meet all the criteria needed to implement PWA and to have them fully functional? If not, what's it missing?
2) Have you read/seen anywhere mr. Chen expressing his opinion on this? I could not find anything, but still, maybe someone knows smth.
3) Any long-term risks that you see if BB10 would start focusing on PWA?
4) Would implementing PWA be enough for BB10 to revive? If not, what else should be addressed?
p.s. I know kind of similar thread was created, but I decided to recreate it with proper keywords, so that people could find it easier.
The link to the old one: (https://forums.crackberry.com/genera.../#post12851749)
Thanks
Posted via CB10anon(8679041) likes this.10-04-17 09:02 AMLike 1 - Virtually all of what your first link alludes to can be done with 2 bb10 devices.
Posted via CB10anon(8679041) likes this.10-04-17 08:34 PMLike 1
- Forum
- BlackBerry 10 Phones & OS
- BlackBerry 10 OS
Are Progressive Web Apps an option for BB10?
« Request : Nintendo Emulators For BlackBerry OS 10
|
Whatsapp on BlackBerry OS 10 devices still usable in 2018? »
Similar Threads
-
Swipe Shortcuts Options is GONE after Update to 7.1.1.
By bhoqeem in forum BlackBerry AuroraReplies: 12Last Post: 10-25-17, 04:22 AM -
My Passport app launcher went down, please HELP
By Nikolay Konov in forum BlackBerry PassportReplies: 7Last Post: 07-06-17, 06:52 AM -
Coursera app not working
By KudoShinichi in forum Ask a QuestionReplies: 0Last Post: 07-05-17, 08:19 AM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD