First--I really am sorry if this has been upsetting, such that I'm driving you to drink. I think you're a helpful member of the community. It doesn't mean I think you're right, and I think you're biased on this, and you simply made a point that's not true.
I'll summarize how this discussion went down to make it really clear.
Post
#52 you said:
"The rub is that you have to have tens of millions of users to spread proprietary OS development costs over enough people to make it financially feasible.
Currently, there are less than a million BB10 users when it's free."
I believe what you're attempting to argue is that no one would pay for BB10, because less than a million people use BB10 (currently), even when it's free.
But that's not true--because BB10 was NEVER a separate item. Customers DID pay for a product which inherently included BB10.
So, your premise (BB10 was "free") is false.
For whatever reason, you refuse to simply admit that's an overreach. Then you attempt to claim that money is somehow following discrete paths and that money can go various places, but NEVER to OS development costs. I don't think you can make that claim, and I highly doubt you have any evidence to back that up.
You're using the claim that few (less than 1 million) people will use BB10 even when it's free. That's NEVER been the case.
It is simply not true. A few million users DID pay for BB10, and wanted to use BB10. The fact that Blackberry's business plans failed and their sales did not produce profits doesn't negate the fact that people Paid for BB10.
More specifically people CHOSE to pay for BB10, and whether or not anyone would pay MORE is the question at hand in this entire thread.
I just have no idea why you refuse to admit that you made an inaccurate point (that BB10 is free).
Enjoy your shots.