[beckzyboi]

I hate watermarked PINS! If someone could make me an autoloader to install the .634 SDK and all corresponding .632 files you'll make me a very happy man! Much love

Posted via CB10

[vinniesworld]

Problem is from as far as I recall the .634 OS is not a full OS so even with the .632 files you'll not get a fully functional system.
Watermarks are a small price to pay for a fully functional OS at this early stage.

Posted via my Z10 (10.3.0.1154)

[beckzyboi]

I wouldn't mind the watermarks if someone gave me a good enough reason to install it. I've read no posts that state any bug fixes or performance improvements in 10.3.1.632 compared to 10.3.1.1154. All I want is a bit of positive feedback to persuade me to install it, but no one seems to have any. So why should I install 10.3.1 with watermarks if it is no better than 10.3.0?

Posted via CB10

[vinniesworld]

For me, I have audio stutter when listening to music and streaming and I also have issues with swiping on the keyboard in .1154
I haven't heard reports that these issues are present on 10.3.1 but I know reports are saying the audio issues are gone.

I've not installed 10.3.1 yet as despite the issues I have my phone set up how I want it.

Posted via my Z10 (10.3.0.1154)

[beckzyboi]

I'm very tempted to install 10.3.1.632 on my Q10 using the autoloader posted. However, seeing as though I'm not a fan of watermarked PINs, I think I will wait and HOPE for more positive feedback. I don't see the point in upgrading simply because of the version number. There have to be bugs fixes and/or performance enhancements if I am to upgrade.

Posted via CB10

[xACiD]

Tbh after a while you don't even notice the watermarks, or maybe it's just me.

Posted via CB10

[eduzojordan]

It has a few things for me, but worth it and have no problems using it after 3 days.
Battery life is good, lift to wake is interesting, apps load faster.
The most important for me was support exFAT, now I can use my SanDisk Extreme Plus 32GB MicroSDHC UHS-I Memory Card,
my Z30 even installed a driver that let me access the card from Windows.

[yessuz]

634 is not a full os. 632 is full.

it is ALWAYS recommended to use FULL os over dev.

[cbcoza]

I wouldn't mind the watermarks if someone gave me a good enough reason to install it. I've read no posts that state any bug fixes or performance improvements in 10.3.1.632 compared to 10.3.1.1154. All I want is a bit of positive feedback to persuade me to install it, but no one seems to have any. So why should I install 10.3.1 with watermarks if it is no better than 10.3.0?

Posted via CB10

I'm getting better performance than 1154 on Z30. It fixes my BT and FM problems of them not working at all.. 632 is smooth and flows with ease. All round it's better that any 10.3.0 version. Saying that. That is my phone and my experience, like the previous versions, the same setup for others worked well. It's a risk you take to try.

Posted via CB10

[beckzyboi]

My main concern is the radio in this build. I had nothing but bother with 1053 and 1155 radios. Worst radios ever!

Posted via CB10

[yessuz]

It has a few things for me, but worth it and have no problems using it after 3 days.
Battery life is good, lift to wake is interesting, apps load faster.
The most important for me was support exFAT, now I can use my SanDisk Extreme Plus 32GB MicroSDHC UHS-I Memory Card,
my Z30 even installed a driver that let me access the card from Windows.

Exfat drivers are here from 10.2.2 I believe. And they were here since 10.3 leaks above. 700

Posted via CB10

[vinniesworld]

We have to bear in mind 10.3.0 was designed with passport in mind, 10.3.1 is designed for the best if the rest.
10.3.1 I would most definitely expect to have proper optimisations for these devices.

I think I might take the plunge and load her up.

Posted via my Z10 (10.3.0.1154)

[beckzyboi]

We have to bear in mind 10.3.0 was designed with passport in mind, 10.3.1 is designed for the best if the rest.
10.3.1 I would most definitely expect to have proper optimisations for these devices.

I think I might take the plunge and load her up.

Posted via my Z10 (10.3.0.1154)

F*ck it, I'm loading her up too. Will report back once I've wiped, loaded and wiped again.

Posted via CB10

[eduzojordan]

Exfat drivers are here from 10.2.2 I believe. And they were here since 10.3 leaks above. 700
Posted via CB10

Yeah, I know. But for me, at least, it did not worked. With previous OSes, camera app store pictures on SD card, but when try to open to use them there was a black box instead, and then picture was gone. Some users have reported similar issues, some also suggested some fixes: format the card on windows with guiformat, format using sandisk tools, format card from within the device. None of them worked for me.
After installing 10.3.1.632 leak I inserted the SD card and it worked, no more deleted pictures. It just worked right away, no formatting required.

[Gearheadaddy]

For me, I have audio stutter when listening to music and streaming and I also have issues with swiping on the keyboard in .1154
I haven't heard reports that these issues are present on 10.3.1 but I know reports are saying the audio issues are gone.

I've not installed 10.3.1 yet as despite the issues I have my phone set up how I want it.

Posted via my Z10 (10.3.0.1154)

I had no issues on 1154...10.3.1.632 has added features...

Crackberry Genius on Verizon 10.3.1.632

[dpw09]

I hate watermarked PINS! If someone could make me an autoloader to install the .634 SDK and all corresponding .632 files you'll make me a very happy man! Much love

Posted via CB10

All releases pre ".1000" will have PIN watermarks.
.632 and .634 or both pre .1000

Need to wait for 10.3.1.1xxx

EDIT: from what I am seeing is that .634 does in fact NOT have pin watermarks. That's a first.

Z10STL100-3/10.3.1.632

[Arabianhorse]

Agree. .632 works well. Have adjusted alert colors and tones already. Browser seems faster. I have no problem with the radio. Camera is back to normal.
From a non IT/Crackberry addict viewpoint :
Best OS so far

STA 100-3 10.3.1.396

[Chris Degroote]

10.3.1.632 runs mutch better on my Z10 STL -2 then 10.3.0.1154.
No issues at all but I recommend a wipe before the install and reinstall everything from scratch.

Posted via CB10

[Candelo114]

Does .634 and .632 have the same radio?

Posted via CB10

[Candelo114]

I'm having horrible battery life with .632
If the radio version on the sdk version is slightly higher then I would like to install the radio on my .632

Posted via CB10

[dpw09]

I'm having horrible battery life with .632
If the radio version on the sdk version is slightly higher then I would like to install the radio on my .632

Posted via CB10

Have to give it about 24 hours for the OS to settle. Then the battery levels off.

Z10STL100-3/10.3.1.632

[Candelo114]

Have to give it about 24 hours for the OS to settle. Then the battery levels off.

Z10STL100-3/10.3.1.632

I've had .632 installed since it was released a few days ago and it's still draining at a significant speed.

Posted via CB10

[Ertank]

634 is not a full os. 632 is full.

it is ALWAYS recommended to use FULL os over dev.

You're right, unless you have STL100-1 which is not included with 632. For others like me, we would like to give it a try with an autoloader since some futures not working by side loading missing apps may work with an autoloader.

Posted via CB10