[Davis Rayler]

Rome, The next one is the Rome.

So they are leaving the best one to the end? D:

Posted via CB10

[Sairos]

So they are leaving the best one to the end? D:

Posted via CB10

Yup, this will be the one xD.. The Hamburg is the DTEK50.

[Davis Rayler]

Yup, this will be the one xD.. The Hamburg is the DTEK50.

Wait DTEK50 wasn't NEON?

I'm waiting for the one with the Keyboard I thought it was the Hamburg (Mercury)

Posted via CB10

[drags_bberry]

@ Sairos. Maybe you're in the states or wealthy EU country? We, and I mean those of us that live in the US, can grab tons of stuff for cheap. I can see the price difference.



Posted via CB10

[goku_vegeta]

Good grief. I bet some of the people complaining about the TCL partnership can't even tell me the last device that was actually BUILT by BlackBerry.

Aside from a handful of engineering samples in Waterloo, and perhaps the Dev Alpha's (Mine said Made in Canada). I don't think RIM has actually BUILT any devices from in house. Certainly not the models that went into production after their testing.

[leeiling]

They are not. They are doing so to reduce the cost of developing hardware as much as possible. We can leave the best quality stuff behind and start to live the same standard that most people do. I won't mind that they let TCL do the design and the manufacturing work. I won't buy one any way.

Posted via CB10

[keliew]

There's no viable reason to do so. Manufacturing costs a lot with very minimal returns. Outsourcing it to OEM makes sense if the design is good, and manufacturer is chosen rightly.

Most IT brands do it to earn on the margin they need/want.

It makes sense.

BlackBerry Passport via CB10

[thurask]

Profitable? Listen, mate, in my country called Serbia, I can get you unpacked and unused Note 5 for 500eurous, and this DFek gonna cost same in Europe, I guarantee it, and you think they gonna profit? Pffff

Posted via CB10

You can probably get a Mercedes with the serial numbers ground off free with that purchase, too.