-
@Hans, I understand what you're saying.
There is the camp that says: "If it does what I need, then I'll stick with it". There is nothing wrong with that. Many people still on Windows XP, or a Bold 9900 are like that.
For others, updating, tweaking, and learning new things is part of the joy of owning a computer, a smartphone, or any technology for that matter. And that's OK too.
Whatever floats your boat.
Z30STA100-5/10.3.2.2339
-
Well said, Conite!
And yeah, Vista is the worst OS that Windows ever released in history that's why 7 came along and put back smile on its users. Same with BB10 OS. :)
Pasaporte Pilipinas | SQW100-1/10.3.2.2339
-
I guess it depends on the person's personality. For those who are not risk takers, there is no point updating something and ruining something perfectly fine for the sake of just a little gain (of course, assuming the gains are little). Those who don't mind the risks, will upgrade without hesitation to get the latest (and hopefully the best).
With regards to upgrading from 10.3.1 to 10.3.2, if you are not a risk taker, and don't see any significant improvement listed, it might not be worth upgrading.
I only upgraded myself recently via Sachesi. The main reason being the low notification volume bug that it started in my Q10 when I previously upgraded to 10.3.1. So far, the only significant things I have noticed (based on the features I use and am interested in) are as follows:
- Low volume - no change, it is still low.
- Calendar - Got back the bars/lines option instead of the dots and circles; an improvement.
- Calendar - it now crashes, it's much slower (response time), and it randomly mixes up the tasks and appointments; certainly a negative.
So, overall, my previous 10.3.1 was more suitable for me.