The patents are worth billions. What's the justification for holding on to them?
So, fellow armchair CEO's, our company owns billions of dollars worth of cellphone patents. The purpose of holding on to them is to defend our mobile phone business from patent claims from other smartphone companies, right? It's kind of a mutually assured destruction thing - you sue us and we will sue you right back in a bigger way.
So if we are just hoping to break even or make a small profit on smartphones, how can we justify holding on to these patents to achieve that? What's the opportunity cost of not selling them when we could get billions for them and invest in the more profitable part of the business that we are growing?
Remember that dismissing an rebutting and argument are two different things. No credit for dismissing ;)