The patents are worth billions. What's the justification for holding on to them?
- So, fellow armchair CEO's, our company owns billions of dollars worth of cellphone patents. The purpose of holding on to them is to defend our mobile phone business from patent claims from other smartphone companies, right? It's kind of a mutually assured destruction thing - you sue us and we will sue you right back in a bigger way.
So if we are just hoping to break even or make a small profit on smartphones, how can we justify holding on to these patents to achieve that? What's the opportunity cost of not selling them when we could get billions for them and invest in the more profitable part of the business that we are growing?
Remember that dismissing an rebutting and argument are two different things. No credit for dismissing01-30-15 11:01 AMLike 0 -
Then they are still being used to support the marginally profitable smartphone business. I'm talking about selling the patents and getting out of smartphones. The opportunity cost of $2B in patents is probably $100-200M per year (5-10% return on capital). Anything less and you should return the $2B to your shareholders so that they can invest it elsewhere.01-30-15 11:07 AMLike 0 - Patents are worth what someone will pay for them. And we just don't know how much of those deal with only hardware, compared to patents that might be more of other products like BBM, BES.... There is "value" there, but not nearly what it was a few years ago.
The important thing is Services are still tied to hardware. If BlackBerry stopped making hardware, they lose half of their revenues and there is a good chance that revenues on services has not hit bottom yet, especially if hardware went away.
Before Chen gets rid of one product he needs another to replace it.... he is working on that, but he isn't ready yet.01-30-15 02:57 PMLike 4 - Grade: Incomplete
Then they are still being used to support the marginally profitable smartphone business. I'm talking about selling the patents and getting out of smartphones. The opportunity cost of $2B in patents is probably $100-200M per year (5-10% return on capital). Anything less and you should return the $2B to your shareholders so that they can invest it elsewhere.
If BlackBerry were to sell the patents, I bet FairFax is first on the list to get back their $1.2 Billion. The rest would go towards a transition to a services/software company.
Shareholders would see the same dividend on a sale of Patents as they did on most all of BlackBerry's other physical assets.EchoTango likes this.01-30-15 03:03 PMLike 1 - They could sell them off and still cross-license them, Google did this when the sold Moto to Lenovo, each got some of the patents and then cross-licensed them to each other. BB is perhaps negotiating this with Samsung since Sammy wants to go in big into consumer IoT they'll need protection which QNX/BB patents may provide.01-30-15 03:51 PMLike 0
- Patents are worth what someone will pay for them. And we just don't know how much of those deal with only hardware, compared to patents that might be more of other products like BBM, BES.... There is "value" there, but not nearly what it was a few years ago.
The important thing is Services are still tied to hardware. If BlackBerry stopped making hardware, they lose half of their revenues and there is a good chance that revenues on services has not hit bottom yet, especially if hardware went away.
Before Chen gets rid of one product he needs another to replace it.... he is working on that, but he isn't ready yet.
I like this answer a lot. This means an activist shareholder could easily come in and buy these $10 shares and put some pressure on the Prem Watsa clan to extract the value from these assets.
If BlackBerry were to sell the patents, I bet FairFax is first on the list to get back their $1.2 Billion. The rest would go towards a transition to a services/software company.01-30-15 04:47 PMLike 0 - http://imgc-cn.artprintimages.com/im...lue-for-sh.jpg
"Yes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders."01-30-15 04:56 PMLike 4 - So, fellow armchair CEO's, our company owns billions of dollars worth of cellphone patents. The purpose of holding on to them is to defend our mobile phone business from patent claims from other smartphone companies, right? It's kind of a mutually assured destruction thing - you sue us and we will sue you right back in a bigger way.
So if we are just hoping to break even or make a small profit on smartphones, how can we justify holding on to these patents to achieve that? What's the opportunity cost of not selling them when we could get billions for them and invest in the more profitable part of the business that we are growing?
Remember that dismissing an rebutting and argument are two different things. No credit for dismissing
docfreed
Licensed Patent AgentBCITMike likes this.01-30-15 08:07 PMLike 1 - What's something worth ? Whatever some one is willing to pay.
Patients are no different, their relative value is purely subjective until transacted. Recently we've seen some large patient transactions and several high profile lawsuits. These are the primary sources for deriving a value of intellectual properties for any organization and causes many heated discussions between auditors and the company management. Obviously, a company wants to show more asset value, as it goes directly to the value of the company and its shares.
Like some others have said, if Blackberry was to sell off it's patients, a significant portion of the proceeds would be allocated to "other interested parties", while the stock value would be severely impacted. I might even say that without the patients Blackberry could become a penny stock.02-04-15 08:15 AMLike 0 - Grade: A
I like this answer a lot. This means an activist shareholder could easily come in and buy these $10 shares and put some pressure on the Prem Watsa clan to extract the value from these assets.
As long as Blackberry can demonstrate an increase in shareholder value such as decreased debt or productive investment in the service company it should benefit the average shareholder. The point is that keeping the patents has an opportunity cost which means that breaking even on hardware isn't really breaking even.
As I said, companies don't sell assets and then distribute those "dividends" to shareholders. Only time I've seen that is after a bankruptcy, and again the creditors are first in line to get their due.02-04-15 08:21 AMLike 0 -
The cash from the patents does not have to be distributed to shareholders as dividends. If used to grow the services business then it will increase shareholder value.02-04-15 07:35 PMLike 0 - If they are primarily going to be making their profit on services as is assumed then why do they need to hang on to billions of dollars worth of smartphone patents?
The cash from the patents does not have to be distributed to shareholders as dividends. If used to grow the services business then it will increase shareholder value.
And simply we don't the breakdown on the patents.... many that might have been worth millions a few years ago are worthless today because of changes in technology or the reduction in patent litigation. Many of BlackBerry patents have to do with designs like Surepress and QWERTY keyboard... not a whole lot of demand for those anymore. I bet that many of BlackBerry's more valuable patents have more to do with software and services functions than with hardware...
And what would the message be if BlackBerry started selling off patents? I can't think of too many companies that started selling off patents in mass... that weren't Bankrupt. It's an act of last resort.... if you are a shareholder when they start selling patents, you stayed in too long.02-05-15 07:46 AMLike 0 - If they are primarily going to be making their profit on services as is assumed then why do they need to hang on to billions of dollars worth of smartphone patents?
The cash from the patents does not have to be distributed to shareholders as dividends. If used to grow the services business then it will increase shareholder value.
Posted via CB1002-05-15 04:02 PMLike 0 - Prem WatsAppCrackBerry Jester of Jesters
That alone still is a fair share of the share price... ! :-)
� Telstra + Classic, Optus + PP, AT&T + PP , Verizon + Classic... why the mix, Mr. Fix? �02-06-15 06:44 AMLike 0 - The purpose of a publicly traded company isn't to store cash for shareholders. You don't need to buy stock for that. Companies are supposed to use their assets to generate excess returns for shareholders. I'm simply asking what returns these valuable smartphone patents are generating if the hardware business is just going to be breaking even.02-06-15 06:57 AMLike 0
-
Then how much of it is "invested" and may not be convertible to CASH anytime soon... if ever. Some investments work out, and sometimes they don't.
Maybe they have a billion in actual cash.... or maybe they only have a few hundred thousand. Either way the "CASH" doesn't equal current share prices.
Most likely a shortage in cash is one of the reasons that devices are being produced at such a slow rate.02-06-15 07:38 AMLike 0 - I am CEO you say? I believe maintaining control of a whole ecosystem of hardware designs, mobile OS, server OS and app store and media store is vital to overall success: patents support all of those things. If the patents were sold they would be licensed to anyone: they have no value unless someone is going to license them: there are some patents I don't want to license and therefore I don't sell my patents.
If you were CEO you might have a different idea, but I'M CEO so I say that the product and service portfolio as a whole is vital to success, and to divest any line of business would undermine the long-term strategy and drive the company to complete distruction.
Posted via CB1002-06-15 08:51 AMLike 0 - As CEO, you still have to justify your use of assets to shareholders. Otherwise, your share price may remain in the doldrums. For example: BBRY02-06-15 09:13 AMLike 0
-
Posted via CB1002-06-15 09:45 AMLike 0 - Patents often have more of "potential" value than a real value. They can be worth lots, or be worthless. You impart value onto them by either building a service/product that generates revenue and is covered by the patent, or... someone else does and you enforce it (sue them, license it to them, assign (sell) the patent to them, etc).
If BlackBerry only generates $10M on their hardware keyboard business,.. then that's as much as those patents are worth (just don't ask Typo). If they stop making keyboards (or devices altogether),.. then all those hardware patents could very well become worthless overnight since it's clear that the vast majority of handsets will not be adopting any of BlackBerry's hardware features.
They have lots of current encryption technology, which is what generates current licensing fees and is actually of some value regardless of BlackBerry's state,.. and fancy future encryption technology,.. which will only be worth anything if it actually becomes broadly adopted. If they stop development, then it's likely the potential value of the latter will never be realized,..
So yeah... if you need quick cash, it's definitely easier to sell a bunch of office buildings.
Posted via CB1002-06-15 10:08 AMLike 0
- Forum
- Popular at CrackBerry
- General BlackBerry News, Discussion & Rumors
- Armchair CEO
The patents are worth billions. What's the justification for holding on to them?
Similar Threads
-
Showing birthdays in the calendar? 10.2.2. Q10
By Pchoiclkisp in forum BlackBerry 10 OSReplies: 11Last Post: 05-26-15, 02:26 PM -
Setting reminders for e-mails not possible?!
By farvardinzad in forum BlackBerry 10 OSReplies: 5Last Post: 02-12-15, 04:33 PM -
Will .2072 be the official version?
By Ekrem Gurdal in forum BlackBerry 10 OSReplies: 8Last Post: 01-30-15, 07:14 PM -
Finally some advertisement for the Classic in India
By Amritv in forum General BlackBerry News, Discussion & RumorsReplies: 3Last Post: 01-30-15, 05:59 PM -
Major carriers partner to bring LTE to Chicago's subways
By CrackBerry News in forum CrackBerry.com News Discussion & ContestsReplies: 0Last Post: 01-30-15, 10:51 AM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD