I agree. Galaxy S or EVO 4G would've made more sense.
Printable View
I agree. Galaxy S or EVO 4G would've made more sense.
I understand but I believe the Galaxy S and EVO could not be compared due to screen size alone.
How? Most people compare the internals. When you have have head to head battles, the screens are taken into consideration, but it is the internals that are truly compared.
Pretty soon we will be comparing the 7th generation EVO's and Galaxy's to iPads instead of iPhones.
If the EVOs and SGS lines become tablets, yes. If not, no. You have the Galaxy Tab to compare to the iPad.
With the bigger is better belief (except Apple) we are not far away from a 6" smartphone.
I hope not. Hopefully the ridiculousness of trying to 1-up each other (manufacturers and consumers) will come to a screeching halt before that happens.
I hope not too. 3.5-4" is plenty. The one upping in screen size is silly, eventually you wont even be able to hold the thing or put it in your pocket
I won't buy a phone with larger than a 4 inch screen. I was alive and using them when cell phones were big bricks that wouldn't fit in your pocket or a holster. I'd rather not go back there!
Larger screens are only silly until someone perfects and brings to market a device that can be extended and retracted, but that won't be coming out next year.
I wont go any higher than 4.3, and 4.3 has been excellent for me. Lowest I will go now is 4.
I know what you mean. The highest for me is also 4.3" and the lowest is 3.5" if it makes up for its shortcomings. :D
we are talking phones right!!!!LOL
That's what she said. XDI know what you mean. The highest for me is also 4.3" and the lowest is 3.5" if it makes up for its shortcomings.