Join Our 3 MILLION+ Members Today! Register Here | Login
Go Back   BlackBerry Forums at CrackBerry.com > BlackBerry Carrier Discussion > T-Mobile

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
    Thread Author   #1  
Old 02-08-2010, 10:32 PM
CrackBerry Abuser
Device(s): Moto Droid
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 344
Likes Received: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default ESN question

This is a little story, so bear with me, probably not going to get help, but thought I would try.

I sold a BB Storm on eBay. It was confirmed delivered, yet the buyer said it was stolen and filed with PP and got his money back. I didn't insure stupidly cuaes I have sold a few things on there including phones and never had a problem. Since then I have been watching his acct, and he has bought some things for a storm (I'll leave it at that). Now, he is selling a Storm. Could be coincidence, could be my phone.

I had someone contact him and he would not give up the ESN (form a different state so tracing it back to me is impossible to raise red flag). In the listing he says it was activated to TMobile, I know reps in Verizon and ATT who have helped me to make sure this guy didn't activate it on their systems, is there any posibliity if I contacted Tmobile and gave them the ESN and guys name they would say YES or NO this is the phone and nothing else?

The police there won't help me cause they say it is a federal/USPS issue, but USPS won't help cause it isn't worth enough. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #2  
Old 02-09-2010, 01:55 AM
CrackBerry Addict
Device(s): Boldē
Carrier: T-Mobile/AT&T
 
Location: OC
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 532
Likes Received: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LTLFTCer View Post
This is a little story, so bear with me, probably not going to get help, but thought I would try.

I sold a BB Storm on eBay. It was confirmed delivered, yet the buyer said it was stolen and filed with PP and got his money back. I didn't insure stupidly cuaes I have sold a few things on there including phones and never had a problem. Since then I have been watching his acct, and he has bought some things for a storm (I'll leave it at that). Now, he is selling a Storm. Could be coincidence, could be my phone.

I had someone contact him and he would not give up the ESN (form a different state so tracing it back to me is impossible to raise red flag). In the listing he says it was activated to TMobile, I know reps in Verizon and ATT who have helped me to make sure this guy didn't activate it on their systems, is there any posibliity if I contacted Tmobile and gave them the ESN and guys name they would say YES or NO this is the phone and nothing else?

The police there won't help me cause they say it is a federal/USPS issue, but USPS won't help cause it isn't worth enough. Thoughts?
GSM carriers don't use ESN so thier networks wouldn't see it. I don't think T-Mobile blacklists IMEI either.
__________________
Personal: T-Mobile USA Bold 9700 | 5.0.0.545
Work: ATT Wireless Bold 9000 | 4.6.0.304
Past: 8900, 8830, 8700c, 7100t, 7520, 7230, 7750, 6750
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
    Thread Author   #3  
Old 02-09-2010, 09:41 AM
CrackBerry Abuser
Device(s): Moto Droid
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 344
Likes Received: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by se1000 View Post
GSM carriers don't use ESN so thier networks wouldn't see it. I don't think T-Mobile blacklists IMEI either.
Thanks, I know GSM uses SIM, but according to the ATT emp. they can see if the particular phone was activated AFAIK. I am not looking for a blacklist, only if the phone was activated as this guy comminted mail fraud.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #4  
Old 02-09-2010, 10:28 AM
CrackBerry Addict
Device(s): Boldē
Carrier: T-Mobile/AT&T
 
Location: OC
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 532
Likes Received: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

There are 2 numbers, an IMEI for the phone and a SIM number for the SIM card.
__________________
Personal: T-Mobile USA Bold 9700 | 5.0.0.545
Work: ATT Wireless Bold 9000 | 4.6.0.304
Past: 8900, 8830, 8700c, 7100t, 7520, 7230, 7750, 6750
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #5  
Old 02-09-2010, 01:02 PM
CrackBerry Abuser
Device(s): 9700 (Bold)
Carrier: T-Mobile
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 208
Likes Received: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

No, you need to get back at paypal on this. If they ok'd a claim for a claim of "item received not as described" then they should make the buyer ship back the iteam with "proof of delivery" before they issue him a refund.

If he filed a "item not received" claim, then there is no way paypal would refund his money because you have trackable proof of delivery.

....Unless, since you probably sold the phone for more than $250, you had to request "signature confirmation" instead of just regular "delivery confirmation"... Professional cons knows this loophole, they can claim they never received the item even though it shows "delivered", you were supposed to get a signature for items more than $250.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
    Thread Author   #6  
Old 02-09-2010, 01:47 PM
CrackBerry Abuser
Device(s): Moto Droid
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 344
Likes Received: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well, it has been a few weeks. PP did refund his money without any evidence from him and even with my detailed talks with PP. (item not received) The phone sold for less than 250, and I have learned my lesson on eBay and PP for sure.

I have been diligent on this cause i know this guy will make a mistake and I am hoping to get law enforcement and federal USPS help on this based on the principle of the whole thing.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #7  
Old 02-09-2010, 05:10 PM
CrackBerry Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,021
Likes Received: 5
Thanked 22 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myveggies View Post
No, you need to get back at paypal on this. If they ok'd a claim for a claim of "item received not as described" then they should make the buyer ship back the iteam with "proof of delivery" before they issue him a refund.

If he filed a "item not received" claim, then there is no way paypal would refund his money because you have trackable proof of delivery.
100% correct here. There must be more to the chargeback, because the two scenarios are covered here.
__________________
Was my post informative or helpful? Click Thanks
Please do not send me PMs
Ex TMO employee that welcomes questions. Try my username on GoogleTalk or @gmail.com
Feedback Thread
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #8  
Old 02-09-2010, 05:12 PM
CrackBerry Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,021
Likes Received: 5
Thanked 22 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LTLFTCer View Post
Thanks, I know GSM uses SIM, but according to the ATT emp. they can see if the particular phone was activated AFAIK. I am not looking for a blacklist, only if the phone was activated as this guy comminted mail fraud.
With respect to T-Mobile, we can run an IMEI though a reverse lookup which will show any phone numbers that IMEI was used with, and for how long. However, only higher level reps have access to this, as they took it away from the store level. A rep that has access cannot let you know anything about other users of the IMEI, because that would involve releasing personal info to someone not authorized on the bill.
__________________
Was my post informative or helpful? Click Thanks
Please do not send me PMs
Ex TMO employee that welcomes questions. Try my username on GoogleTalk or @gmail.com
Feedback Thread
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
    Thread Author   #9  
Old 02-09-2010, 05:49 PM
CrackBerry Abuser
Device(s): Moto Droid
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 344
Likes Received: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorrisCell View Post
With respect to T-Mobile, we can run an IMEI though a reverse lookup which will show any phone numbers that IMEI was used with, and for how long. However, only higher level reps have access to this, as they took it away from the store level. A rep that has access cannot let you know anything about other users of the IMEI, because that would involve releasing personal info to someone not authorized on the bill.
Thanks, that is the answer I needed (so even if the phone was reported stolen they would not give a yes or no answer as to whether it is the phone or not and nothing else?). As for the PP issue, I got screwed by PP (and the buyer). I contacted PP when I first got the PP claim and did everything they asked me to do. They didn't even wait for any outside investigation by USPS nor did they take a look at the facts I sent them about delivery confirmation and such. 2 days after the claim was filed, they emailed me stating they ruled in his favor and took the money from me. I got shafted and that is why I am continuing the investigation myself with the help of some phone company reps.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #10  
Old 02-10-2010, 12:45 PM
CrackBerry Abuser
Device(s): 9700 (Bold)
Carrier: T-Mobile
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 208
Likes Received: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LTLFTCer View Post
Well, it has been a few weeks. PP did refund his money without any evidence from him and even with my detailed talks with PP. (item not received) The phone sold for less than 250, and I have learned my lesson on eBay and PP for sure.

I have been diligent on this cause i know this guy will make a mistake and I am hoping to get law enforcement and federal USPS help on this based on the principle of the whole thing.

If this is the case then I don't see ANY reason why paypal would honor the buyer's claim. I assume you have a credit card that's linked to your paypal account and PP charged that card in reverse? Then you need to call you CC and file a chargeback with them IMMEDIATELY.

The only thing I can think of is that you "did not" mail the phone to the buyer's "confirmed address on paypal"? Either you mailed to his/her ebay address instead of paypal address or his paypal address was "unconfirmed"?
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
    Thread Author   #11  
Old 02-10-2010, 09:47 PM
CrackBerry Abuser
Device(s): Moto Droid
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 344
Likes Received: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myveggies View Post
If this is the case then I don't see ANY reason why paypal would honor the buyer's claim. I assume you have a credit card that's linked to your paypal account and PP charged that card in reverse? Then you need to call you CC and file a chargeback with them IMMEDIATELY.

The only thing I can think of is that you "did not" mail the phone to the buyer's "confirmed address on paypal"? Either you mailed to his/her ebay address instead of paypal address or his paypal address was "unconfirmed"?


Well, this isn't the way I wanted the thread to go. But I will say this, PP is linked to my savings, regardless, they took the money out of the balance. Phone was paid for and shipped the next day with delivery confirmation and nothing else. Phone arrived according to USPS website 3 days later. according to the times on the web, claim was rendered to PP 7 hours after the delivery confimation was scanned.

Buyer said box was open and phone was missing, but USPS still delivered and there was no "damaged box" note placed by USPS. I let Postal inspectors and police know, both did nothing. Called PP and told them my side and they said everything sounded fine. No matter as 2 days later they gave him his money back. Was sent to confirmed and verifed PP address.

Well, there is more to this story, but not right now. I got the answer I needed and hopefully things turn out.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
Reply
BlackBerry Forums at CrackBerry.com > > BlackBerry Carrier Discussion > T-Mobile   ESN question

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes