Originally Posted by
hurds As for Kevin, Blaze and Matt, since you brought them up, Kevin has no allegiance to BB (aside from starting the site and monetizing on it) and I'm pretty sure everyone was buying into the whole 'bb is dead' thing. They started to aim this site that way (forums, selling other device stuff, editorials about rim being bought by goog, amazon, giving RIM a pitch count, ahhah) and he even said this site would be fine if/when RIM went under, which is fine to say, but it shows what direction he was thinking in. Blaze is on android central and to me I just don't think BB historically has been a good fit for how he seems to be. He seems more like a tinkerer, and again he has no allegiance. He even said his 'BB was out for days' last october, despite the fact in NA is was less than a day. Do you think these guys are incapable of saying anything negatively biased/untrue against RIM and maybe people disagreeing with negative views on RIM are right? Nevermind. To you there is no negative bias against RIM, everything is justified, even the taking light of a life in order to write another scathing unoriginal article bringing up the same old issues on RIM is okay. Matt, I guess you somehow see 'evil' things done, but if 'evil' things were done its likely justified. I'm sure its all there is the forums history. There really is a fascination some people have with RIM/BB despite not using their devices, but I think we see it more here since this has been a safe haven for the 'balanced' people since they were allowed to run free when this site was aiming for a larger base/positioning itself away.