- As I said time and time again before, it is time for BlackBerry to start cashing in on privacy and security breaches. This is yet another example of privacy violations, but the funny thing is, it seems that this happens every day and the world simply is not interested. I have just seen this from Engadget and I'm asking: how much is too much? Is this ever going to stop?
From Engadget: France slaps Google with $204,000 fine for violating privacy laws
France slaps Google with $204,000 fine for violating privacy laws
"Google's run in with France's privacy regulator has come to a rather unglamorous end. After months of deliberation, the National Commission on Computing and Freedom (CNIL) today hit the search giant with a �150,000 ($204,000) fine for breaking the law with its unified privacy policy. It's significantly less than the*�300,000 fine CNIL threatened in September, but the regulator will compound Google's misery by requesting it to display a notice on its Google.fr homepage for two days explaining the decision. It's the latest in a long line of privacy-related investigations against Google: six European countries have launched probes into its*privacy policies, with Spain fining the company�900,000 ($1.2 million)*just last month. Google has protested its innocence throughout, but with penalties coming in thick and fast, it could be forced to amend its policies once more."
STL 100-1 OS 10.2.1.192501-08-14 01:34 PMLike 4 - They won't feel it. They likely don't even account for anything less than $10 million and probably wrote it off with a smile rubbing their hands for yet another "victory". The principle is they were found guilty of privacy violations and the fine is immaterial.
Posted via CB1001-08-14 01:49 PMLike 4 - 01-08-14 01:56 PMLike 18
- That is seriously nothing of a fine, it won't matter to anyone, everyone knows their information is being sold if they use Google, most people don't care a bit. Google just like all corporations and banks, consider fines merely an investment, the fines never exceed what is gained by the company, and henceforth considered a viable strategy to utilize. If the margin is too thin then the company will lobby legislation to move the barriers away from the intent. This is even taught if you venture far enough into economic studies. It's amoral, and most individuals would do it too. If you had the opportunity to spend $10,000 and you knew it would yield you $500,000 for sure, you'd do it, even if it meant you were breaking the law and paying a fine. The difference is your fine as an individual would likely equate the gain and be accompanied by jail time because you don't have scores of lawyers of which their only goal is to keep you out of prison full time.
How much is too much? It's not even close to a breaking point. As long as there are class distractions that keep the middle class feeling above poverty, aka manufactured consent, nobody will care.01-08-14 02:27 PMLike 12 - That is seriously nothing of a fine, it won't matter to anyone, everyone knows their information is being sold if they use Google, most people don't care a bit. Google just like all corporations and banks, consider fines merely an investment, the fines never exceed what is gained by the company, and henceforth considered a viable strategy to utilize. If the margin is too thin then the company will lobby legislation to move the barriers away from the intent. This is even taught if you venture far enough into economic studies. It's amoral, and most individuals would do it too. If you had the opportunity to spend $10,000 and you knew it would yield you $500,000 for sure, you'd do it, even if it meant you were breaking the law and paying a fine. The difference is your fine as an individual would likely equate the gain and be accompanied by jail time because you don't have scores of lawyers of which their only goal is to keep you out of prison full time.
How much is too much? It's not even close to a breaking point. As long as there are class distractions that keep the middle class feeling above poverty, aka manufactured consent, nobody will care.
Edit: I mean, when will people stand up and say: NO, you can't have it. It is private, it is personal and you do not have the right to infringe on one of the basic fundamentals of freedom and human rights.
STL 100-1 OS 10.2.1.1925clickitykeys and bungaboy like this.01-08-14 02:38 PMLike 2 - Huh...the most important thing to remember here is: I get free hangman apps on Android so I am blissfully happy and ignorant
Arm yourselves people, the day of reckoning is surly coming!!!01-08-14 03:40 PMLike 0 -
STL 100-1 OS 10.2.1.1925bigbadben10 likes this.01-08-14 03:53 PMLike 1 - I would go with "Plain Stupid" and completely "Unaware", those two go hand in hand....people love being spoon fed with pablum these days...its easier that way!01-08-14 04:00 PMLike 0
- Which explains the Nexus' $350 price tag. Take a loss on the HW to get the phone into someone hands, and then mine their data!H_O_Boomaye likes this.01-08-14 04:07 PMLike 1
- That is seriously nothing of a fine, it won't matter to anyone, everyone knows their information is being sold if they use Google, most people don't care a bit. Google just like all corporations and banks, consider fines merely an investment, the fines never exceed what is gained by the company, and henceforth considered a viable strategy to utilize. If the margin is too thin then the company will lobby legislation to move the barriers away from the intent. This is even taught if you venture far enough into economic studies. It's amoral, and most individuals would do it too. If you had the opportunity to spend $10,000 and you knew it would yield you $500,000 for sure, you'd do it, even if it meant you were breaking the law and paying a fine. The difference is your fine as an individual would likely equate the gain and be accompanied by jail time because you don't have scores of lawyers of which their only goal is to keep you out of prison full time.
How much is too much? It's not even close to a breaking point. As long as there are class distractions that keep the middle class feeling above poverty, aka manufactured consent, nobody will care.kbz1960 likes this.01-08-14 04:13 PMLike 1 - I have been seeing this more and more and it makes me want to switch away from Google. I don't use their phones but I use their email. Where can one switch to that is more concerned with our privacy and not selling our data? Microsoft? Yahoo? Host your own?01-08-14 04:43 PMLike 0
- Katie, I'm 100% with you there. The gullible end user is the victim and they merrily go along with a violation of personal privacy without truly understanding the implications. This is a sad state of affairs.
Edit: I mean, when will people stand up and say: NO, you can't have it. It is private, it is personal and you do not have the right to infringe on one of the basic fundamentals of freedom and human rights.
STL 100-1 OS 10.2.1.192501-08-14 05:01 PMLike 3 -
Posted via CB10bigbadben10 likes this.01-08-14 05:04 PMLike 1 - That is seriously nothing of a fine, it won't matter to anyone, everyone knows their information is being sold if they use Google, most people don't care a bit. Google just like all corporations and banks, consider fines merely an investment, the fines never exceed what is gained by the company, and henceforth considered a viable strategy to utilize. If the margin is too thin then the company will lobby legislation to move the barriers away from the intent. This is even taught if you venture far enough into economic studies. It's amoral, and most individuals would do it too. If you had the opportunity to spend $10,000 and you knew it would yield you $500,000 for sure, you'd do it, even if it meant you were breaking the law and paying a fine. The difference is your fine as an individual would likely equate the gain and be accompanied by jail time because you don't have scores of lawyers of which their only goal is to keep you out of prison full time.
How much is too much? It's not even close to a breaking point. As long as there are class distractions that keep the middle class feeling above poverty, aka manufactured consent, nobody will care.
Posted via CB10kbz1960 likes this.01-08-14 05:17 PMLike 1 - No, I'm saying it's either that, or they don't care, the difference is irrelevant as the result is the same.01-08-14 07:19 PMLike 3
-
But, in response to the other poster, it's not really fair to isolate one ecosystem and call all of its users gullible. At some point in time, by accessing the internet, we're all giving up some elements of our privacy, whether we like it or not, and/or whether we're aware of it or not.
Just my opinion.01-08-14 07:32 PMLike 6 - 01-08-14 07:39 PMLike 2
-
STL 100-1 OS 10.2.1.1925MERCDROID likes this.01-08-14 11:10 PMLike 1
- Forum
- Popular at CrackBerry
- General BlackBerry News, Discussion & Rumors
Google in hot water again.
Similar Threads
-
What Does Expire Day in Remote Log Collection Mean?
By tanphat1412 in forum BlackBerry 10 OSReplies: 6Last Post: 09-03-15, 03:44 AM -
Help on Gmail in Hub
By bpgc in forum BlackBerry 10 OSReplies: 16Last Post: 02-01-14, 10:07 AM -
Good times is back again
By avnishsp in forum Armchair CEOReplies: 9Last Post: 01-07-14, 11:55 PM -
In the drivers seat with QNX at CES 2014
By CrackBerry News in forum CrackBerry.com News Discussion & ContestsReplies: 5Last Post: 01-07-14, 11:02 PM -
Don't see abc app in app world
By redk in forum BlackBerry 10 AppsReplies: 2Last Post: 01-07-14, 02:50 PM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD