- Well folks, what do you think? Me, I was unimpressed, Madonna, who I was a fan of in her early days, lip sync'd her way to a very poor showing while her aged (though buff) body failed to deliver...I mean, even the Tin Man is more fluid when he wakes up. I bet Betty White could have done a better job breaking some moves then the over the hill Madonna.
I have a suggestion for Madonna before she does any more live appearances, drink some Joint Juice and use this:
Attachment 102152
02-06-12 06:16 AMLike 0 - I don't care much for Madonna, and personally, I'm happy she didn't sing her virgin song. I would rather have seen almost anyone at halftime...
Or, as was already stated, loose the pregame and halftime shows altogether.02-06-12 10:58 AMLike 0 - kbz1960Doesn't MatterThe end was the best part. What is it with lipsyncing anyway. So many do that now. If you can't sing without having your voice mixed and manipulated how do they sell so much? They do because they are who media pushes and says is great. After awhile people tend to believe it.02-06-12 11:16 AMLike 0
- The end was the best part. What is it with lipsyncing anyway. So many do that now. If you can't sing without having your voice mixed and manipulated how do they sell so much? They do because they are who media pushes and says is great. After awhile people tend to believe it.
But for artists that lipsynch night in and night out, a la Britney, I do NOT condone it at all. Sure, sure, sure, the artists like Britney, they would argue that you are paying for a performance and show, and not one person's voice. I find that disingenuous.
When The Who performed, they kind sucked a bit since Pete seemed drunk and did not appear to be playing well. And Roger's voice is obviously not what it used to be. But it was an honest and real performance.kbz1960 likes this.02-07-12 12:12 PMLike 1
- Forum
- CrackBerry Community
- Rehab & Off-Topic Lounge
Super Bowl Half Time Show
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD