[lifestartat17]

Hi. This is my v8 hybrid. I'm using the .656 based (only 33 files used) mixed with OS 5.0.0.692 full Java.

The About screen & (alt+shift+h) shows v.5.0.0.692

BBM 5.0.0.66 also included.

*After download, replace your .656 Java folder with this one*

It's been tested carefully with no issues found!!!

lifestartat17's 9700 Hybird v8 (.656/.692)

For those who likes my 604 browser patch (will boost your browser speed) download the file below

Download 604-Browser-Patch

[Ethrem]

What is different between this and pwn's?

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[PwnCakes193]

Basically my hybrid with a tiny but faster browser

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[lifestartat17]

well, I'm only using 33 files from 656, so the java file is almost 95% are from 692. If you want a faster browser, mixed it with my 604-Browser-Patch then try to load this page The Acid3 Test to test the render speed (mine is mostly under 40 sec, the score is 93/100)

[PwnCakes193]

Mostly everything gets a 93/94. Even all my laptops get it.

[lifestartat17]

Mostly everything gets a 93/94. Even all my laptops get it.

from pc with opera will get 100/100

[PwnCakes193]

Still it's not a great way to test anything

[lifestartat17]

well, all i want is to shared my work, that's all, people wanted to give it a try or not is up to them, btw if you guys find anything in this build, just let us know ok

[PwnCakes193]

I'm not trying to bring you down! I think we can learn a lot from eachothers builds

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[Phill_UK]

Does that Acid Test ever score anything under 93%?

Just tried it several times using base .656 and it's 93% every time...



Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[PwnCakes193]

No, thats the issue with the acid3 test. You can do it on virtually anything and it gets the same scored

[BigBadWulf]

Here I sit, on EDGE, in the slowest bloody data area I've ever experienced, and I scored:

Also inaccurate, but at least somewhat realistic:
Whoops! Sent up the wrong speed test at first, but now corrected

WAPers do it With A Passion
I'm many people's brother, have several BB daughters and sons,
but I sure as heck ain't your momma!

*
I'm a Survivor Baby!But the dang game fizzled out

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[lifestartat17]

It's not about the score that I'm talking about, it's about the render speed, from 1 to last score.

[BigBadWulf]

I didn't see a render speed, but I did have this lovely shade of pink:

WAPers do it With A Passion
If everyone spoke Wulfanese�, they wouldn't need to click here for a translation.

Click Here To Be Banned*
Drive a PwnCakes Hybrid. It'll keep your Onyx purring.

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[lifestartat17]

Lol, I stopwatch it

[BigBadWulf]

Probably the gestation period for a large yak.

WAPers do it With A Passion

If everyone spoke Wulfanese�, they wouldn't need to click here for a translation.

I hear tell you�re doin� well, good things have come to you.
I wish I had your good-luck charm, and you had a do-wacka-do, wacka do, wacka-do, wacka-do.

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[chaddeus]

This file size is about 40MB while Pwncakes is about 75MB.. So whats the diff again?

With only 33 files being .656, how about Pwncakes?

I am not interested in the .604 browser but wondering more about the usability and stability...

- Charles

[lifestartat17]

Well so far the usability and stability are increased. So if there's any findings just let us know.

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[PwnCakes193]

Usability and stability are basically the same. It's just who you want to trust to develop your hybrids

[chaddeus]

So far so good. At least no issue with the voice recorder part. Usability, stability pretty much the same.. In fact, I don't see improvement since .593 to .656 to Pwncakes v5.2 to this one.. It maybe psychological.

Well but I am happy with this right now. More files are upgraded to .692 compared to Pwncakes v5.2

- Charles

[lifestartat17]

Thanks for your findings & support

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[raangella]

I just loaded it up last night, so far it run smooth, no issues I found, I try to count the boot time, it's 1min 45secs. I tell u if I find something else. Thanks.

[lifestartat17]

I just loaded it up last night, so far it run smooth, no issues I found, I try to count the boot time, it's 1min 45secs. I tell u if I find something else. Thanks.

Thank you

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[WK446#CB]

I am also trying your build, after using Pwncakes Hybrids almost exclusively. I have not noticed any issues. I did try the 604 Browser and I noticed that rendering seems slightly faster than Pwncakes v520 version. However, when the 604 Browser pages through past webpages, it appears to take slightly longer.

Overall, I think you did a fine job lifestartat17. Kudos.

The more Hybrid competition, the better the end product will be!

Like other board members, I prefer stability, reliability, and speed (and in that order).

[lifestartat17]

I am also trying your build, after using Pwncakes Hybrids almost exclusively. I have not noticed any issues. I did try the 604 Browser and I noticed that rendering seems slightly faster than Pwncakes v520 version. However, when the 604 Browser pages through past webpages, it appears to take slightly longer.

Overall, I think you did a fine job lifestartat17. Kudos.

The more Hybrid competition, the better the end product will be!

Like other board members, I prefer stability, reliability, and speed (and in that order).

Cool, I'm glad that you find it works great. Thank you.

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com