I was planning to ditch Verizon and get the Bold 9700 but I decided to White out my current Tour and hold out for the 9650 ... that's going break my pocket
But anyway I think of the Bold and the Tour as Rim's top of the line smartphones just:
CDMA vs. GSM
Different form factor (not much of a difference)
Crappy but snappy processor the 9650 will be getting vs what the 9700 has
I think the 9650 rear should look exactly like the 9700, leather back and everything ... if not than similar
The current rear the 9630 and 9650 has looks very dated !!!! compared to the 9700
Anyone agree
Last edited by Muscle Master; 01-07-10 at 07:05 PM.
I think the faux leather back on the Bold is outdated and ugly. I love the new Bold, but that battery door would be the first thing to go if I moved to a GSM device.
I think the faux leather back on the Bold is outdated and ugly. I love the new Bold, but that battery door would be the first thing to go if I moved to a GSM device.
the faux leather back on the Bold is very ugly! The Bolds a nice phone, but looks wise its pretty bad in my Opinion. The way the keys run off the screen and the back of the Bold having that Faux leather back just adds to the ugliness
i like the back cover of the 9700 especially with the word "Bold". It would probably be nice if they put the word "Tour" on the back of the 9650. Would that look nice? I don't know, just my opinion
To me, the 9700 looks a lot better than the 9650. The beveled edges on the sides all the way up and the lack of a plastic border between the screen and the keyboard look very clean. The back is wack but the rest of the phone is hot. Look at the pics BGR posted showing them together. The 9650 just doesn't look as sleek and clean to me. So much so that I seriously considered going to AT&T's wack a$$ 3G in the hopes that it wouldn't negatively affect me too dramatically due to WiFi.
Last edited by Jaredius; 01-08-10 at 09:51 AM.
Reason: grammar
Exactly my point, different strokes for different fokes
But there's no denying it ... the rear of the 9630 and 9650 is as bland as ever
While I agree that different phones appeal to different people, that's what makes BB's so great, the choices. But, cheap looking fake leather is far from classy.
Those "bland" backs of the Tours with there simple and sleek style is what I would call classy.
Nah...I like the form factor of the bold in comparison to the tour, but the bezel does give me more of a chance to show off customizations for when I change out face plates. The back doesn't make any difference to me since my phone is going to be firmly planted in a protective case. Accidents will happen and I need to lessen the chances of destruction.
since when did faux leather become classy? I thought it was the exact opposite... i think the back of the original tour is great, and it does not need to say tour...thats so trashy looking, its a phone, not a billboard
since when did faux leather become classy? I thought it was the exact opposite... i think the back of the original tour is great, and it does not need to say tour...thats so trashy looking, its a phone, not a billboard
Thank God someone has some sense around here. Fuax leather classy.... if you believe that then you are the type to add a room to the back of your trailer for "Momma" after winning the "Lotto"
Thank God someone has some sense around here. Fuax leather classy.... if you believe that then you are the type to add a room to the back of your trailer for "Momma" after winning the "Lotto"
I was planning to ditch Verizon and get the Bold 9700 but I decided to White out my current Tour and hold out for the 9650 ... that's going break my pocket
But anyway I think of the Bold and the Tour as Rim's top of the line smartphones just:
Let's hope . I would like the same Tour size but more Bold 9700 look!
CDMA vs. GSM
Different form factor (not much of a difference)
Crappy but snappy processor the 9650 will be getting vs what the 9700 has
I think the 9650 rear should look exactly like the 9700, leather back and everything ... if not than similar
The current rear the 9630 and 9650 has looks very dated !!!! compared to the 9700
Anyone agree
I do hope it looks like the Bold 9700 but keep the Tour size
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
Thank God someone has some sense around here. Fuax leather classy.... if you believe that then you are the type to add a room to the back of your trailer for "Momma" after winning the "Lotto"
honestly imo i think the leather back on the bold is ugly and no way should the tour have that look. I dont know what it is i just think the leather makes the phone look less classy even though a lot of people think the opposite. The back of the current verizon tour is my favorite of all phones i think, besides it not really fitting tightly. But the carbon fiber look is pretty cool. Also i wouldnt mind a metal back on the 9650 like the storm
I think the faux leather back on the Bold is outdated and ugly. I love the new Bold, but that battery door would be the first thing to go if I moved to a GSM device.
The battery door is sweet. It looks good and it feels good and another positive is that it doesn't scratch like the other plastic battery doors on the other devices. It looks really elegant. I hope that RIM continues to make the Bold series with the leather back.
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
I think the faux leather back on the Bold is outdated and ugly. I love the new Bold, but that battery door would be the first thing to go if I moved to a GSM device.
you can find some hot metal batery door for 9700 on sw-box.com
I've had a skin on my tour so I only ever noticed the back panel when I did battery pulls for the two weeks before I found out about alt+^+del. Also what's up bud, you're obviously the same Muscle Master from C5.