[xxxxpradaxxxx]

So did anyone get to see this sucker last night?

I did, IMAX 3D!!!

[KillYouWithMyMind]

Well how was it?!

I'm kinda worried...

[xxxxpradaxxxx]

It was okay, not as glorious as I thought it would be... But still good.

I honestly didn't know that this was a sequel-

I thought it was going to be a remake.

But still, being the AMAZINGLY amazing fan of Alice that I am, I didn't care.

[KillYouWithMyMind]

Sequel?! I never knew that either... I might have to wait for the DVD/Bluray release.

[xxxxpradaxxxx]

I wouldn't wait. It's definitely worth seeing on the big screen, if you like Alice of course though.

But yea, it's a sequel.

[highjakker]

yeah i heard it was "through the looking glass" and not "alice in wonderland"...or whichever order they are....i'm still psyched to see it.

[thinkamp]

I cannot wait to go and see it. I will wait for the madness of running out and seeing it to calm down and then go see it.

[KillYouWithMyMind]

How was the 3D imaging? I think it was done in post-production so it's not the best quality...

[zorak]

Gonna go tonight...

[xxxxpradaxxxx]

The 3D was okay, some parts were a little too "Dramatic" and hurt my eyes.

Ya know, the sudden "jolt" of something jumping out at you to quick for your eyes to adjust?

But it was still okay.

[dc4integra]

haven't seen it... but i did give a listen to the soundtrack

[BoldtotheMax]

Taking the kiddo's to see it next weekend as hopefully the crowds calm down by then. Just wish it didn't cost so much to see it in 3d. After watching Avatar on IMAX I have to see it in 3d though.

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

[peargood]

caught the show yesterday and it's sooo worth it, 3D effects was really quite nice.
it doesn't stick to the original storyline but that's what that leaves room for imagination

[MzV33]

I just saw it yesterday...it was ok, there were some funny scenes...i really enjoyed depp as the mad hatter but other then that it was just alright

[xxxxpradaxxxx]

I saw it again on satuday.

I still think it's a good movie, but definitely not Tim Burtons best.

[Username00089]

Wouldn't even waste my time and energy.

[username0022]

All these remakes make me want to cry. Really. It'd be one thing if the remakes were equally as good as the original, but they're not. Not even close. Those who say they're fans of the story wouldn't be caught dead watching this crap. Disservice to all.

Here's an excellent live-action adaptation of Alice in Wonderland.

Alice in Wonderland (1985) (TV)

[xxxxpradaxxxx]

But this wasnt a remake :-(

[username0022]

But this wasnt a remake :-(

I understand, but why keep the name then?

[xxxxpradaxxxx]

Brand recognition?

Why did they do the Da Vinci code when Angels and Demons came first?

[Blkbear]

It was okay, not as glorious as I thought it would be... But still good.

I honestly didn't know that this was a sequel-

I thought it was going to be a remake.

But still, being the AMAZINGLY amazing fan of Alice that I am, I didn't care.

The hint that it was a sequel was everyone in the TV previews, referred to her as being "THE"Alice or asked if she was "THE" Alice.

Kinda like TIN Man that was on the tube a year or so ago, being a sequel to the Wizard of OZ.

[zorak]

I understand, but why keep the name then?

Because Hollywood likes making money?

[xxtrrublexx]

I'm not a fan of Tim Burton movies nor do I enjoy Johnny Depps acting. So....the chances of me seeing this movie are about as slim as me winning the lottery.

[WhoolioPreludee]

Not worth the money to go see in theaters, wait till it comes out on DVD or blue ray.....

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com