 Thread Author
# 1

01-28-2012, 09:57 AM
|
| | CrackBerry Genius Device(s): Bold 9930 Carrier: Verizon | | Location: in a coffee mug. Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,824 Likes Received: 71
Thanked 104 Times in 93 Posts
| |
System building, memory problem. Of sorts.
I'm helping a couple build a new rig, and we've run into a snag with memory. We're arguing (yes, actually) over amount of sticks versus bus speed vs latency. I'm pretty decent at throwing a machine together but we're getting downright specific as they're on a budget but still trying to squeeze every ounce of performance they can. Motherboard has yet to be decided, CPU is going to be a Core i5-2500 Sandy Bridge with the Z68 chipset.
I suggested a pair of 4gb sticks for a total of 8gb, plus DDR3-2133 which is quite fast and will keep it well under $100. Then I mentioned the latency might be a little high but the bus would make up for it, and it went downhill from there. The question now is: is a lower latency going to dent the bus speed that much? And with that, does having 4 sticks spread the load as much as sounds?
Example: four sticks (4x 2gb) of DDR3-1600 with a latency of, let's say, 7 would be faster/slower than two sticks (2x 4gb) of DDR3-2133 with a latency of 11 (my original selection). I can't imagine DDR3-1600 making up any difference no matter how low the latency is. They'll settle on something regardless, completion isn't contingent upon my giving them an answer.
__________________
We pause here briefly so that some Crackberrians can recover from their exposure to the mindblowing notion that perhaps one should not treat one’s own anecdotal experiences as universal truths.
Never let a computer see you hurry.
|