Join Our 3 MILLION+ Members Today! Register Here | Login
Go Back   BlackBerry Forums at CrackBerry.com > BlackBerry OS and Desktop Management Software Discussion > Leaked/Beta OS

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #151  
Old 07-05-2009, 06:40 PM
CrackBerry Genius
Device(s): Bold 9930
Carrier: Verizon
 
Location: CA
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,129
Likes Received: 131
Thanked 225 Times in 99 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by macnthamost View Post
In the past, there's been screenshots of leaks that we have yet to see...
Right. But there's been talks of 5.0 for a loooong time and we haven't even seen a screenshot until now, while the Bold/Curve have gotten several and even leaks.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #152  
Old 07-05-2009, 06:42 PM
CrackBerry Genius
Device(s): Bold 9930
Carrier: Verizon
 
Location: CA
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,129
Likes Received: 131
Thanked 225 Times in 99 Posts
Default

Question.....I remember 5.0 being said to have 4.7 components just carried over from the higher builds. Why is the OS so buggy then? Is it because 5.0 has other additions over the latest 4.7 builds that have to comply?
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #153  
Old 07-05-2009, 06:52 PM
Forums Moderator
Device(s): BB 9930, GT+ 16 & PB 16
Carrier: Verizon
Pin: K Floyd!
 
Location: Philly
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,576
Likes Received: 731
Thanked 804 Times in 544 Posts
Default

Could we soon be getting a 5.0 leak?

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #154  
Old 07-05-2009, 06:53 PM
ThreeSixMafia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Likes Received:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanGlowCam View Post
Question.....I remember 5.0 being said to have 4.7 components just carried over from the higher builds. Why is the OS so buggy then? Is it because 5.0 has other additions over the latest 4.7 builds that have to comply?
They'll figure it out.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #155  
Old 07-05-2009, 06:54 PM
CrackBerry Abuser
Device(s): 9530 (Storm)
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 410
Likes Received: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The only reason I think 5.0 won't be as good as storm 2xx builds is because we have already seen 5.0 on other blackberries and its nothing revolutionary. Or is the storm 5.0 completely new rather than a ported build with the same functionality? It just seems like the 2xx are newer then the 5.0 to me

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #156  
Old 07-05-2009, 06:59 PM
ThreeSixMafia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Likes Received:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonc624 View Post
The only reason I think 5.0 won't be as good as storm 2xx builds is because we have already seen 5.0 on other blackberries and its nothing revolutionary. Or is the storm 5.0 completely new rather than a ported build with the same functionality? It just seems like the 2xx are newer then the 5.0 to me

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
Let's look past 4.7
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #157  
Old 07-05-2009, 07:20 PM
CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses
Device(s): ~ Retarded In Mind ~ Storm - It's CLICKTASTIC!!! © / ViPhone 4 - Cuz I'm VIP. 
Carrier: I hate RIM/Carrier VPL Service Books!!! | Truncated Emails... really RIM... really? | KB13677 is BS!
Pin: I'm the Page Ranking person for Crackberry. :p | Don't be a CEO, Search the Forums! | Hybrids Suck!
 
Location: On Safari in the CB jungle. ;)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14,367
Likes Received: 7
Thanked 210 Times in 130 Posts
Default

Maybe it's just me, but I still think a lot of this push/pull battle RIM fights with the code to get everything working properly is because of the poor nature of the Java platform. I mean seriously, when you compile a version and you lose basic (I can't answer a call) functionality when you probably didn't even touch that part of the code, something tells me you're trying to build your mansion out of a deck of cards instead of normal building materials.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #158  
Old 07-05-2009, 07:25 PM
CrackBerry Genius
Device(s): Bold 9930
Carrier: Verizon
 
Location: CA
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,129
Likes Received: 131
Thanked 225 Times in 99 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRSCCivic98 View Post
Maybe it's just me, but I still think a lot of this push/pull battle RIM fights with the code to get everything working properly is because of the poor nature of the Java platform. I mean seriously, when you compile a version and you lose basic (I can't answer a call) functionality when you probably didn't even touch that part of the code, something tells me you're trying to build your mansion out of a deck of cards instead of normal building materials.
Yeah. You have a good point there. But I think the software has potential when they do get rid of the bugs.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #159  
Old 07-05-2009, 07:25 PM
CrackBerry Addict
Device(s): 9550 (Storm2)
Carrier: Verizon
 
Location: Langhorne, PA
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 674
Likes Received: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pkcable View Post
Could we soon be getting a 5.0 leak?

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
God I hope so.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #160  
Old 07-05-2009, 07:32 PM
CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses
Device(s): ~ Retarded In Mind ~ Storm - It's CLICKTASTIC!!! © / ViPhone 4 - Cuz I'm VIP. 
Carrier: I hate RIM/Carrier VPL Service Books!!! | Truncated Emails... really RIM... really? | KB13677 is BS!
Pin: I'm the Page Ranking person for Crackberry. :p | Don't be a CEO, Search the Forums! | Hybrids Suck!
 
Location: On Safari in the CB jungle. ;)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14,367
Likes Received: 7
Thanked 210 Times in 130 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanGlowCam View Post
Yeah. You have a good point there. But I think the software has potential when they do get rid of the bugs.
There has never been an OS version all the way back to 4.2.2.x versions that didn't have a few bugs in them. You'll never get one that's 100%... get used to it. I believe it's completely impossible to perfect a Java based OS... not one that's required to have so much functionality. Java really should stay on basic systems... if even that.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #161  
Old 07-05-2009, 07:35 PM
CrackBerry Genius
Device(s): 9650 (Bold)
Carrier: Digicel
 
Location: Barbados
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,118
Likes Received: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Alot of you guys (Storm owners) will be dissappointed will 5.0. The best feature so far is the loading/reboot screen. Don't expect anything to flashy.
__________________
Device history: 8100 > 8320 > 9000 (brief) > 9530 (Ugh!) & 8900 > 8220 > 8120 > 8520 > 9550
> 9000 > 9700 9650

BB tech: Got a problem? Feel free to PM me.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #162  
Old 07-05-2009, 07:45 PM
CrackBerry Addict
Device(s): 9530 (Storm)
Carrier: MTS Allstream
Pin: 3088767D
 
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 534
Likes Received: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRSCCivic98 View Post
Maybe it's just me, but I still think a lot of this push/pull battle RIM fights with the code to get everything working properly is because of the poor nature of the Java platform. I mean seriously, when you compile a version and you lose basic (I can't answer a call) functionality when you probably didn't even touch that part of the code, something tells me you're trying to build your mansion out of a deck of cards instead of normal building materials.
Whats your proof of this? Do you speak from a programming background, or from just hearing people talk about some limitations of Java and coming up with your own conclusions (remember the entire OS isn't built out of Java).

It is possible that they did make changes which impact answering a phone call, we just don't know what it is. I don't think its really fair to anyone at RIM for us to be sitting on our computers on a forum looking at screenshots and judging how well they know their jobs, especially when I highly doubt most people here have any experience in a job such as designing a phone OS, let alone any kind of software developement (judging from lots of the posts). I say wait till the final version until we decide to judge how good of a job they have done.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #163  
Old 07-05-2009, 07:49 PM
CrackBerry Addict
Device(s): 9530 (Storm)
Carrier: MTS Allstream
Pin: 3088767D
 
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 534
Likes Received: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRSCCivic98 View Post
There has never been an OS version all the way back to 4.2.2.x versions that didn't have a few bugs in them. You'll never get one that's 100%... get used to it. I believe it's completely impossible to perfect a Java based OS... not one that's required to have so much functionality. Java really should stay on basic systems... if even that.
Not only has blackberry never had a perfect OS, windows never has either, neither has Mac OS, or the iPhone, android or Windows Mobile. Linux isn't perfect either. There is no such thing as perfect completely bug free software, especially when you are trying to get the kind of functionallity that we want out of a smartphone. When you have no control over what programs a user loads on a phone, or how they use it it is virtually impossible to account for all different situations. We will never see a perfect OS, and neither will any phone, just learn to love and appreciate what you have and stop finding fault in absolutely everything, because you'll drive yourself crazy.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #164  
Old 07-05-2009, 07:53 PM
CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses
Device(s): ~ Retarded In Mind ~ Storm - It's CLICKTASTIC!!! © / ViPhone 4 - Cuz I'm VIP. 
Carrier: I hate RIM/Carrier VPL Service Books!!! | Truncated Emails... really RIM... really? | KB13677 is BS!
Pin: I'm the Page Ranking person for Crackberry. :p | Don't be a CEO, Search the Forums! | Hybrids Suck!
 
Location: On Safari in the CB jungle. ;)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14,367
Likes Received: 7
Thanked 210 Times in 130 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cd36 View Post
Whats your proof of this? Do you speak from a programming background, or from just hearing people talk about some limitations of Java and coming up with your own conclusions (remember the entire OS isn't built out of Java).

It is possible that they did make changes which impact answering a phone call, we just don't know what it is. I don't think its really fair to anyone at RIM for us to be sitting on our computers on a forum looking at screenshots and judging how well they know their jobs, especially when I highly doubt most people here have any experience in a job such as designing a phone OS, let alone any kind of software developement (judging from lots of the posts). I say wait till the final version until we decide to judge how good of a job they have done.
Sounds like a bit on a defensive side huh? Well, let's see, RIM cannot stamp an OS as "final version" really since they don't release the OSs, the carriers do. With that said, you think .148 is "final version"?..... yeah, didn't think so either.

Not raining on your parade, just putting some things into perspective.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
  #165  
Old 07-05-2009, 07:54 PM
CrackBerry User
Device(s): 9530 (Storm)
Carrier: bell
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 87
Likes Received: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

@cd36

Let me guess.... You're the guy who's got a blackberry tattoo on his shoulder.

Look, java sucks and every intelligent programmer knows this as a fact.
Reply With Quote Tip this Post
Reply
BlackBerry Forums at CrackBerry.com > > BlackBerry OS and Desktop Management Software Discussion > Leaked/Beta OS   Screen Shot of 5.0.0.92

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes