Dakota full specs leaked!

**barrist** · 04-08-2011, 01:06 PM

http://n4bb.com/5755/blackberry-bold...agon-processor

Pretty much the only news is the CPU is finally confirmed, although if you looked at the roadmap of some of the other phones (curve touch) they had the 8655 as well so it would have made sense to have the same chip family.

Not too bad, it's clocked faster than the Thunderbolt which uses the same chip but at 1ghz i believe.

And 8GB eMMC, sounds like you can finally use your entire internal memory for app installs.

**Seijuro** · 04-08-2011, 01:08 PM

i loooooooooove the bold touch already, wish it had bigger led and flash support tho : )

**D_March** · 04-08-2011, 01:21 PM

This looks like pretty awesome.

**contender** · 04-08-2011, 01:41 PM

Under network it has hsdpa 14.4 mbps. Yayyyy! Made my day

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

**compucat** · 04-08-2011, 01:50 PM

14.4 HSPA+ is great! PLUS....5.76 HSUPA! That and the CPU was finally announced. I'm feeling more confident about this now.

**unity04** · 04-08-2011, 04:27 PM

The phone specs look awesome.. right now I have a Motorola Atrix (most powerful smartphone on the market - dual core) and if the specs listed in that image are actually legit, I'm dropping this Atrix in a heart beat and getting the Bold Touch.. Android is a device for entertainment and can't touch BlackBerry on communications.. I'm hoping that the specs are legit.. it's not difficult for a guy to open photoshop and whip up a fake document chart like in the image... just gotta wait until May now for a confirmation

**ewuzh** · 04-08-2011, 04:58 PM

1230 mAh battery seems a bit lacking. Hopefully (somehow) overall power consumption is down so the smaller battery doesn't actually shorten battery life.

**DannyAves** · 04-08-2011, 07:47 PM

Nothing in the specs about UMA....does it have it or not?

**Masahiro** · 04-08-2011, 08:38 PM

Originally Posted by compucat

14.4 HSPA+ is great! PLUS....5.76 HSUPA! That and the CPU was finally announced. I'm feeling more confident about this now.

This is quite a key development in the leaked slides. Everything else is pretty much what we've known from the start. I can't wait! I just hope the somewhat mediocre-looking battery can take the strain. If not, I hope Seidio releases some extended batteries (still waiting for them to release any for the Torch!).

**contender** · 04-15-2011, 11:38 PM

Based on the specs will I be able to use this device on tmobile and at&t? My concern is that I'm on tmobile currently, and if at&t does buy tmobile, I don't want to end up with a useless device. I know I can use tmobile phones on at&t network, but ill only get EDGE and not 3g. But since the hspa frquency are the same, I wouldn't be comprimising speed like it is currently, correct? I should be able to get 3g/hspa+ with this device on both network, right?

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

**mustangv8** · 04-16-2011, 05:31 AM

Originally Posted by Seijuro

i loooooooooove the bold touch already, wish it had bigger led and flash support tho : )

Yea, I wish so too

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

**Seijuro** · 04-16-2011, 07:07 AM

Originally Posted by mustangv8

Yea, I wish so too

Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

well, at least QNX will support flash : )
and hopefully those devices will have bigger LED's again, but didnt see the small LED in action, so gotta wait..

**Chaz720** · 04-16-2011, 07:21 AM

Exactly.. the small LED nigh be nice and bright

**Flip4Bytes** · 04-16-2011, 07:49 AM

Originally Posted by Chaz720

Exactly.. the small LED nigh be nice and bright

I think it is just as big as the Torch currently out. People haven't really complained about that so i don't see what would end up being wrong with he LED.

**ichat** · 04-23-2011, 12:26 PM

Ooooohhhhh this looks like a good phone

**fabio984** · 06-17-2012, 11:13 AM

Can anyone tell me the diference between the 9810 1.2 processor, and the 9900 1,2 Single core, QC 8655? I just dont find what means this qc8655...

**Phill_UK** · 06-17-2012, 12:14 PM

There is no difference... both models (and the 9850/60) have the same Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8655 1.2GHz processor.

**fabio984** · 06-17-2012, 12:18 PM

I dont get it. Wht in specs they write 9900 = Single core, 1200 MHz, QC 8655
And write 9810 = 1200 MHz... Must be something...

**howarmat** · 06-17-2012, 12:24 PM

QC is for qualcomm, its the people that made the chip (MSM8655). both phones have the same chip

**fabio984** · 06-17-2012, 06:34 PM

Aaaa ok.... I just dont get what the websites put the name on the description, and doesnt on the 9810. I sold the 9810 and im waiting for my 9900.

**markcf105** · 06-17-2012, 08:49 PM

Are these specs a joke, i mean 5.0MP 720P camera and bluetooth 2.1.... I am getting so sick of this, if RIM keeps up this motto of business not fun, they are going to FAIL. Based on these specs I will do crappy things twice as fast, hey dude look I can open emails faster than you....

I really wish my company would wake up and allow another phones on there netwrok, at this point I could care less what phone just not RIM.... As a fellow Canadian RIM needs to wake up....

**nah.uhh** · 06-17-2012, 11:01 PM

Originally Posted by markcf1051

Are these specs a joke, i mean 5.0MP 720P camera and bluetooth 2.1.... I am getting so sick of this, if RIM keeps up this motto of business not fun, they are going to FAIL. Based on these specs I will do crappy things twice as fast, hey dude look I can open emails faster than you....

I really wish my company would wake up and allow another phones on there netwrok, at this point I could care less what phone just not RIM.... As a fellow Canadian RIM needs to wake up....

..? Lol, was there any phone with bluetooth 3.0 when this phone (dakota = 9900) was released?(In 2011), the iphone 4s & its 8mp w/ 1080p wasn't out when the op posted this.