Results 1 to 25 of 31
- 05-15-2009, 01:32 PM
Thread Author #1
Best Bold OS for Battery?
Im on .266 now, what else is better for battery? Do you think I should try out 5.0? I don't need stability on my phone, so it's no issue
- 05-15-2009, 03:12 PM #2
If nothing sticks to teflon, how does teflon stick to the pan?
- 05-15-2009, 05:06 PM #3
My perception was that .247 was best for battery for me, but I'm never too far from a charger so I guess I could be wrong.
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com - 05-17-2009, 01:37 PM
Thread Author #6
- 05-17-2009, 02:29 PM #7
.266 so far is same as the .162 and has failry good/excellent battery life.
.162 gave me 4-4.5 hours of talking and .266 i am still testing it, but so far drainage is the same, so far that means it is comparable, but time will tell.
I run a bold and i am on rogers. - 05-17-2009, 03:39 PM #8
im going back to .266 for battery life
~PRIDE!~
- 05-18-2009, 04:33 PM #9
i've been back on .266 for about a week now (mainly for battery life). missing the better picture quality that OS 5 software offers though. but .266 is solid.
- 05-18-2009, 04:53 PM #10
5.0.0.93 has been the best for me so far.
- 05-18-2009, 07:40 PM
Thread Author #11
So it seems that people are split between 5.0 and .266?
- 05-18-2009, 08:25 PM #12
.93 is the best for me also.
better than .266
- 05-19-2009, 06:57 AM #13167>.216>.237>.247>.266>.282>.292>.297>.90>. 93>.100>.238>.314>.348>.411>.464>.509>.554>.592>.6 10>.681 (current o/s)
- 05-23-2009, 10:55 AM #15
For those that sat 5.0 is better that .266, how was .266 for you? For me, .266 is by far better than any others. Have yet to try anything 5.0.
.266 + Seidio 1650 = awesomeness!
I'm on over 2 full days since my last charge, with normal use. I'd say a fair amount of web browsing (2G) and a little Wifi also. I'm still at 20%!Last edited by Blacklac; 05-23-2009 at 10:57 AM.
- 05-24-2009, 01:38 AM #16
Could it be that 5.0.93 is better in battery life because there are less apps running since a lot of them are not compatible?
- 05-25-2009, 01:10 PM
Thread Author #17
I'm using .247 right now, and it seems good so far. I have to retry .266 again
- 05-27-2009, 01:28 PM #19
5.0 has issues with apps though
- 05-27-2009, 01:30 PM #20
i tried 5.0 and it gave me alot of issues
- 05-30-2009, 09:30 AM #22
I've just come back to a Bold from the javelin and I've found that the .247 is the best for me so far... Does anyone know where I can actually dl .266 to test it? I've had a look at .93 but whilst its slighty better than .247, the incompatibility of a majority of apps means .247 for the win!
Anyways... .266 dl link anyone?
Nirave - 05-30-2009, 11:55 AM #23
- 06-03-2009, 10:39 PM #24
I agree with most here: I ran .247 then .93 then .266 and battery life seems good, espcially for me: IM apps running & connected, Pandora/Slack running all day on WiFi and EDGE, and vibrate+tone for emails (maybe 60 a day?) and SMS/IM (easily over 100).
- 06-08-2009, 12:39 PM #25
I wasn't satisfied with the 5.0.0.93 as the cursor was laming in main menu when scrolling around in a circle. It just doesn't run fluently for me and the graphical numbers that display the runtime of tracks in the media player are faulty (graphic failures). Maybe I had too high expectations in that OS but I downgraded back to .266 after almost 20 minutes. Will wait now for the first official 5.0 OS and will install it by doing a wipe before, to get sure there will be no failures transferred.
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com

Reply

















