So ever since I posted that I'll be releasing an update to my hybrid (which is already a year old), you've added to your responses (probably knowing i would read them)
Originally Posted by delfteo
"Only one can be the best."
"Don't worry DelftEo is always the best Bold 9000 hybrid."
which is funny since you've been using my hybrids as a base for your 'hybrids'. Proof of this claim includes:
- my theme from it or the entry for it's installation found in one of the alx's
- the core alx's are identical other than name changes it
- unchanged alx's for the apps (including the versions of the cod's included), including the choice of the included apps themselves
- the base 1079/1082 mix for the majority of the hybrid was the exact same as found within mine
- The count of os6/7 and choices are pretty much the same as the base.
The few more cod's you've used from os6/7 (roughly about half a dozen) that over all creates execution errors (not to be confused with verification errors) in the error log. I took about 10 minutes each with your 7.4 and 7.5 (after your last few posts) to see that you've not even considered fixing them (or not know how to).
Side Note: If you really knew what you were doing you'd have known long ago that it was platform 184.108.40.206 that had volume graphical issue in it's resources, and was the reason I switched back to using the older.93 and .95 versions., .106 ALSO has this issue since it was built off .104 source.
Your installer still has no registry entries for the build, and is a shotty implementation at best. You're even using the same wipe batch from my earlier installer and the entry you added to 'launch' loader.exe will only work on your computer rather than everyone else's. (You might want to look into 'windows system variables' and how they work)
While competition is always good, and it's always good to see someone continuing support for old devices after the most experienced of us builders have moved on (lyridical, willyboy, myself, etc)... It's not, however, good/acceptable to see someone saying they're the best when the majority of their work is based off someone elses, and without credit or any awknowledgement of it either (In the Android world its called "kang'ing").
This post was simply to point out your ineptitude and arrogance of calling yourself 'the best', and bringing to light the hint of fear you're giving off because the progenitor of 'your work' has shown up.
I'm not calling myself 'the best' either, because I did learn from someone who was better than myself. The reason why they passed on the reign's was because I used their knowledge and took it a step further and improved it without using their past work. If you really want to be the best, make your own from scratch, spend the time to edit the scripts, fix the errors in the countless numbers of error logs, and clean up the mess inside your "hybrids" ...learn how to do new things.
As Niccolo Machiavelli said to Leonardo da Vinci: “Pity the student who does not surpass his master.”