Welcome to the CrackBerry Forums Create Your Account or Ask a Question Answers in 5 minutes - no registration required!
Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 109
Like Tree27Likes
  1. gng11's Avatar
    CrackBerry Addict

    Posts
    673 Posts
    Thread AuthorThread Author   #1  

    Post What RIM needs to do for QNX: Focus on one Phone and open up retail stores!

    I honestly think that Blackberry needs to focus on one single touchscreen phone, like the iPhone, not several phones. Too many phones = lost in translation as to what RIM is trying to get at. People nowadays don't want a phone that fits their personality, they want a phone that is the "it" phone. Minus the ad hype Apple created, it make sense anyway that one phone is efficient rather than several phones that you have to choose from.

    If RIM's execs feel that they can go with a keyboard and a touch screen, I'd say leave the keyboards to the 3rd party designers or a team at RIM to come up with some suave accessories to compensate for the lack of keyboards- iPhone users now have the option to buy a Bluetooth wireless keyboard, and that is smart because it generates some more money for Apple.

    Apple has already shifted the paradigm of the consumer to touch, and the keyboard now seems too overwhelming to look at if designed as part of the phone. Unfortunately, I believe this is the time to look at reality. At least in where I live in, people love simplicity and clean design.

    All together: Simple, clean and liked by all is what design should be. Apple got that one right. Let's hope that RIM will get theirs right as well.

    Secondly: If RIM needs some advice, I believe that it seriously needs to consider opening up retail stores, like a "Blackberry Store". As RIM's VP Don Lindsay has said, it's all about the UX (User Experience). Also opening up retail stores = spreading free advertising.

    The consumer and business markets as RIM has so often categorised is no longer separate, but rather inter-linked and unified markets. Business people are consumers, and consumers are also business people in some ways. Heck even consumers may want security grade messenging, etc.

    Word of mouth and "silent" advertising is the most powerful form of advertising, not commercials or print advertising. People going "oohs and ahhs" through their friends' phones is what drives sales. Do you see Apple or Google investing the majority of their marketing in print or in TV ads for their phones? Not really.

    Lastly, I'd say don't rush the pace and keep teasing on the side, but learn from Apple to be secretive and don't reveal or say anything until you have the final "pow" factor. RIM really needs that "one more thing....." moment

    Just my 2 cents as a patriotic Canadian.
    Thanked by:
    akaquietstorm (10-13-2011) 
  2. #2  

    Default

    There's a reason why most outside of Apple predicted the Apple stores would fail: retail stores built by electronics companies usually do. Examples include Gateway, Sony, Pioneer and others. Even Microsoft stores seem to be struggling.
    daveycrocket likes this.
  3. gng11's Avatar
    CrackBerry Addict

    Posts
    673 Posts
    Thread AuthorThread Author   #3  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Economist101 View Post
    There's a reason why most outside of Apple predicted the Apple stores would fail: retail stores built by electronics companies usually do. Examples include Gateway, Sony, Pioneer and others. Even Microsoft stores seem to be struggling.
    Microsoft is a different story, it is a software company to start with. It never knew retail because it relied on distributors to do the work on its behalf. Apple started with hardware and then software, so its forte is in the hardware.

    But Apple and RIM are in parallel situations financially, RIM still has a cash crop enough to open up some stores, and consider its origins as a hardware company, so it makes sense that I believe retail stores would be a hit with consumers. At least where I live, Apple Stores are often the rage in malls and beats even department stores in terms of per minute traffic.
  4. _StephenBB81's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses

    Posts
    8,236 Posts
    Global Posts
    8,251 Global Posts
    #4  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gng11 View Post
    I honestly think that Blackberry needs to focus on one single touchscreen phone, like the iPhone, not several phones. Too many phones = lost in translation as to what RIM is trying to get at. People nowadays don't want a phone that fits their personality, they want a phone that is the "it" phone. Minus the ad hype Apple created, it make sense anyway that one phone is efficient rather than several phones that you have to choose from.
    No WAY!! RIM has survived this long PURELY on their keyboard, they have the best in the business and NEED to keep going with it, I many RIM faithful would not buy the QNX OS if they only offered touchscreens, and actually IF RIM planned to discontinue their keyboard line, I would also sell my shares as they would soon die.

    Quote Originally Posted by gng11 View Post

    If RIM's execs feel that they can go with a keyboard and a touch screen, I'd say leave the keyboards to the 3rd party designers or a team at RIM to come up with some suave accessories to compensate for the lack of keyboards- iPhone users now have the option to buy a Bluetooth wireless keyboard, and that is smart because it generates some more money for Apple.
    you must not be an Enterprise user or someone who lives on the road, accessories are a pain to manage and deal with, Bluetooth eats more battery, RIM could make accessories for their touchscreens, or a Bluetooth of their amazing keyboard, but not keyboard means a piece of crap phone for me,

    Quote Originally Posted by gng11 View Post
    Apple has already shifted the paradigm of the consumer to touch, and the keyboard now seems too overwhelming to look at if designed as part of the phone. Unfortunately, I believe this is the time to look at reality. At least in where I live in, people love simplicity and clean design.
    Clearly if EVERYONE wanted touchscreens RIM would have closed shop in 2009, and not survived into 2012 with increasing product shipments quarter over quarter. You want RIM to Play the METO game against Apple who does it so well? how is that good business sense? Think RC cola can beat coke cola at making a brown carbonated cola?

    Quote Originally Posted by gng11 View Post
    All together: Simple, clean and liked by all is what design should be. Apple got that one right. Let's hope that RIM will get theirs right as well.
    I am completely thankful you have No position in running RIM, nor any future prospects I suspect.

    Quote Originally Posted by gng11 View Post
    Secondly: If RIM needs some advice, I believe that it seriously needs to consider opening up retail stores, like a "Blackberry Store". As RIM's VP Don Lindsay has said, it's all about the UX (User Experience). Also opening up retail stores = spreading free advertising.
    I actually agree they need a retail store, BUT Not why you think they do. RIM needs a Retail store not about spreading FAR FROM FREE advertising, but for providing a customer experience location, a place for warranty's a place for Public training of features, a Place for Enterprises to be able to send employee's a Higher Margin channel for Enterprise sales, and the ability to leverage against Carrier stores selling against the BlackBerry,

    They would also have the opportunity to create the BlackBerry Brand, Make BBM exciting, BBM shirts, Pins, bumper stickers, hats, BlackBerry shirts, ties, pins, belts etc, Peripherals for the BlackBerry could be launched and tested in retail channels before pushing them through distribution being able to better control MSRP with higher margin clothing, and accessories they theoretically will offset the cost of the Retail location ensuring they are not a liability

    Quote Originally Posted by gng11 View Post

    The consumer and business markets as RIM has so often categorised is no longer separate, but rather inter-linked and unified markets. Business people are consumers, and consumers are also business people in some ways. Heck even consumers may want security grade messenging, etc.
    Yes and NO. My Consumer phone has FAR different requirements than my Business phone, my Bold 9900 is both a business and a personal phone, it has bells and whistles, but I MUST keep my curve 9300 as it's battery life is 3-4 times that of my 9900, and when I am on the road I CAN be 36 hours with no charging abilities, and need 20h of usable emails.
    Consumers want the bells and whistles, the SMB market also wants them, the Large enterprise market needs control, and control comes from limiting bells and whistles, sorry but that is just the case. an App based phone not permitted to use apps isn't as useful as a phone made to be used without apps.

    Quote Originally Posted by gng11 View Post
    Word of mouth and "silent" advertising is the most powerful form of advertising, not commercials or print advertising. People going "oohs and ahhs" through their friends' phones is what drives sales. Do you see Apple or Google investing the majority of their marketing in print or in TV ads for their phones? Not really.
    On the small scale YES this is true, but the fact the Playbook has sold less than 1,000,000 units says that multimedia advertising matters A LOT, every person I have shown the PlayBook too has ooohh'd and aaaahh'd, and maybe 5% have gone out and purchased one, or put in a purchase request with their company's, but more than 50% of the people I've shown it too don't remember the name of it when I've finished talking, ya it is cool, but to them it is a small ipad, because on TV every tablet is an iPad. and every ad says iPad.

    Quote Originally Posted by gng11 View Post
    Lastly, I'd say don't rush the pace and keep teasing on the side, but learn from Apple to be secretive and don't reveal or say anything until you have the final "pow" factor. RIM really needs that "one more thing....." moment

    Just my 2 cents as a patriotic Canadian.
    I agree they need to keep things to themselves until closer to launch dates, a near 1 year lead up to the playbook was a good thought for developing developer support but without providing developer tools you made a fool of yourself RIM,
    RIM needs to lead with developer tools, and follow with the hardware, that is a change they will have a hard time to wrap their heads around.
    oops...
    Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. \
  5. jasonvw's Avatar
    CrackBerry Abuser

    Posts
    280 Posts
    Global Posts
    281 Global Posts
    #5  

    Default

    Having 1 phone won't work. A real keyboard is a must for a lot of users especially in the enterprise market. Using a separate external bluetooth keyboard is just cumbersome and just wastes time. Blackberry isn't about that at all, its about getting things done very quickly, thats why theres so many damn shortcuts.

    I would love them to concentrate on just a couple phones. Id say 1 touchscreen only, 1 9900 like, and 1 torch like. And these things have to be future proof. No more skimping on hardware and then in 6 months release a better version. They need to make it so it'll be good for a couple years, but in 12 months release something better that will make people want to upgrade. Exactly what Apple does. And yes even though a lot of tech sites are complaining about the 4s, its sold out. People want it.

    They also need to get s*** out the door. No more showing stuff off and then 8 months later releasing it. The excitement is completely lost by the time its actually available. This goes for everything RIM does basically. They need to release stuff quicker. The playbook is a great example.

    As for a store. It won't work. Apple sells more than just phones.

    At the end of the day RIM needs to make some changes.
  6. #6  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gng11 View Post
    [Microsoft] never knew retail because it relied on distributors to do the work on its behalf.
    If you replace "Microsoft" with "RIM," the statement is still true.

    Quote Originally Posted by gng11 View Post
    But Apple and RIM are in parallel situations financially, RIM still has a cash crop enough to open up some stores, and consider its origins as a hardware company, so it makes sense that I believe retail stores would be a hit with consumers.
    Apple and RIM are not in parallel situations financially.

    As for stores being a "hit with consumers," you failed to address how RIM could avoid the fate of Gateway, Sony and Pioneer, not to mention Nokia, in the retail business. Especially Nokia. Your argument seems to be "open stores and people will just show up," but that's not really the case. Apple stores are hugely popular now, but it's because the products are successful. An Apple store with products that people don't want to buy wouldn't have the traffic. Remember that the first Apple stores opened just a couple months before the iPod was announced; the timing wasn't a coincidence.
  7. _StephenBB81's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses

    Posts
    8,236 Posts
    Global Posts
    8,251 Global Posts
    #7  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jasonvw View Post
    e.

    As for a store. It won't work. Apple sells more than just phones.
    RIM could also sell More than just phones.

    I'd like to see the RIM Retail Store have

    BlackBerry Bold Display - 2 Models
    BlackBerry Curve Display - 3 models
    BlackBerry Torch Display - 2 models
    BlackBerry Pearl Display - 2 model
    BlackBerry Style Display - 2 models
    BlackBerry PlayBook Display - 3 sizes

    BlackBerry BlueTooth Ear piece Display
    BlackBerry Peripherals Display ( Presenter2.0(w/HDMI), Mobile receipt printer, docking stations, Batteries, Battery doors, Charging stations.
    BlackBerry casual clothing Display
    BlackBerry Business clothing Display


    BlackBerry App world kiosk allowing you to pay and have apps side loaded saving a data connection, also Music, and Movies
    oops...
    Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. \
    daveycrocket likes this.
  8. _StephenBB81's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses

    Posts
    8,236 Posts
    Global Posts
    8,251 Global Posts
    #8  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Economist101 View Post
    If you replace "Microsoft" with "RIM," the statement is still true.



    Apple and RIM are not in parallel situations financially.

    As for stores being a "hit with consumers," you failed to address how RIM could avoid the fate of Gateway, Sony and Pioneer, not to mention Nokia, in the retail business. Especially Nokia. Your argument seems to be "open stores and people will just show up," but that's not really the case. Apple stores are hugely popular now, but it's because the products are successful. An Apple store with products that people don't want to buy wouldn't have the traffic. Remember that the first Apple stores opened just a couple months before the iPod was announced; the timing wasn't a coincidence.


    See my other post as HOW RIM could make Retail channels work better than Sony (which still has quite a few stores), Gateway, and Pioneer.

    RIM has a Brandname, they need to make Hip, and they could do that better through retail merchandising, and allow them more margin in their coffers.
    oops...
    Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. \
  9. gng11's Avatar
    CrackBerry Addict

    Posts
    673 Posts
    Thread AuthorThread Author   #9  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Economist101 View Post
    If you replace "Microsoft" with "RIM," the statement is still true.



    Apple and RIM are not in parallel situations financially.

    As for stores being a "hit with consumers," you failed to address how RIM could avoid the fate of Gateway, Sony and Pioneer, not to mention Nokia, in the retail business. Especially Nokia. Your argument seems to be "open stores and people will just show up," but that's not really the case. Apple stores are hugely popular now, but it's because the products are successful. An Apple store with products that people don't want to buy wouldn't have the traffic. Remember that the first Apple stores opened just a couple months before the iPod was announced; the timing wasn't a coincidence.
    When I said open up stores, of course there is some spreading the word out involved. Social media... anything.. I am just laying out some broad specifics. Not details down to the core.

    But this is how I feel about the the future of selling for smartphone makers. Don't depend on others to do your work, because you may not have the controls you need for a successful product. RIM may not have exactly as much as products in its line ups as Apple, but hey neither did Apple have the iPhone or iPad, or the Macbooks (well the only laptop from Apple was the iBook), or the iPod touch when it opened its first stores in 2001. Start small, and ye shall grow.
    Last edited by gng11; 10-11-2011 at 07:50 PM. Reason: Addendums
  10. _StephenBB81's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses

    Posts
    8,236 Posts
    Global Posts
    8,251 Global Posts
    #10  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gng11 View Post
    When I said open up stores, of course there is some spreading the word out involved. Social media... anything.. I am just laying out some broad specifics. Not details down to the core.

    But this is how I feel about the the future of selling for smartphone makers. Don't depend on others to do your work, because you may not have the controls you need for a successful product. RIM may not have exactly as much as products in its line ups as Apple, but hey neither did Apple have the iPhone or iPad, or the Macbooks (well the only laptop from Apple was the iBook), or the iPod touch when it opened its first stores in 2001. Start small, and ye shall grow.

    The problem with opening a retail channel up is that you risk damaging your distribution network, it is a careful balance to make sure you can provide the margins your distribution channels will require, and balance that with the retail revenue, if you are using your retail channels as support for the distribution networks, as well as offering services from it, and new products that don't over lap with your network you run a lower risk

    What COULD happen to RIM if they opened retail channels is they could get push back from their main distributors asking for lower purchase prices for the product as they will argue lower volume sales due to direct sales. thus harming RIM's bottom line bringing their already low ASP lower. Apple didn't have the carrier relationship to deal with when they launched the iPod's and their PC business was crap anyway so distribution channels wouldn't fight.

    VERY VERY different models being dictated here. Manufacturing and retail are complicated
    I much prefer manufacturing
    oops...
    Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. \
  11. gng11's Avatar
    CrackBerry Addict

    Posts
    673 Posts
    Thread AuthorThread Author   #11  

    Default

    youtube.com/watch?v=OJtQeMHGrgc

    This is Steve Jobs introducing the first Apple Store in 2001. Notice there were only a few products then, the iMac and the iBook. If Apple accomplished it, then RIM can do it. And in 2001, RIM was ahead of the pack. Apple was only about to enter the mobile devices market.
    Last edited by gng11; 10-11-2011 at 10:30 PM.
  12. sam_b77's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius

    Posts
    2,734 Posts
    Global Posts
    2,739 Global Posts
    #12  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deRusett View Post
    RIM could also sell More than just phones.

    I'd like to see the RIM Retail Store have

    BlackBerry Bold Display - 2 Models
    BlackBerry Curve Display - 3 models
    BlackBerry Torch Display - 2 models
    BlackBerry Pearl Display - 2 model
    BlackBerry Style Display - 2 models
    BlackBerry PlayBook Display - 3 sizes

    BlackBerry BlueTooth Ear piece Display
    BlackBerry Peripherals Display ( Presenter2.0(w/HDMI), Mobile receipt printer, docking stations, Batteries, Battery doors, Charging stations.
    BlackBerry casual clothing Display
    BlackBerry Business clothing Display


    BlackBerry App world kiosk allowing you to pay and have apps side loaded saving a data connection, also Music, and Movies
    All the above are already here in India. Except for the 3 models of Playbook .
    The only difference being that the exclusive stores are opened and run by the RIM India distributor, Redington.
    They have opened a huge number of RIM stores in Delhi. Some in popular market and many in malls. The display is divided on the lines you have mentioned in your post.
    The distributor alson handles the retail channels for RIM. So maybe RIM can take a lesson from them on how to manage margins so that their retails channels are not pis*ed with the exclusive stores.
    The distributor has also opened repair and service centers. These are directly managed by the distributor, but the branding and display is all Blackberry, so most people think they are interacting with RIM directly. The service center is pretty fancy I might add. Lots of Blackberry branding all over and good interior design.
    Maybe RIM doesn't need to get into retail stores directly, but just appoint country distributors and let them manage that side of the business.
    There's always a risk when a manufacturer tries to enter the retail space directly. Apple is an exception not the rule.
    Through the Years :2001 Ericsson T29s> Sony Z5> Sony Z7> SE Z600>Moto A760> RAZR V3>Razr V3i>BB 8800>BB 9500 >BB 9800>Bold 9900..RIM Returns with a bang

    Life was much simpler when Apple and Blackberry were just fruits
    Joy1980 likes this.
  13. mithrazor's Avatar
    CrackBerry Master

    Posts
    1,122 Posts
    PIN
    2B1BC93C
    #13  

    Default

    RIM can't just downsize to one phone and expect them to open a retail store.

    Apple has a wide range of (popular) electronics. RIM only has phones.
  14. Rootbrian's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses

    Posts
    12,230 Posts
    PIN
    Optional, but not needed.
    #14  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mithrazor View Post
    RIM can't just downsize to one phone and expect them to open a retail store.

    Apple has a wide range of (popular) electronics. RIM only has phones.
    And RIM won't just listen to one person either.

    Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
  15. soccernamlak's Avatar
    CrackBerry Addict

    Posts
    588 Posts
    Global Posts
    636 Global Posts
    PIN
    :)
    #15  

    Default

    Personally, I rather see RIM innovate instead of mimic. Copying Apple directly won't get you anywhere. Expanding your brand and image takes more than just copy/paste.


    iPhone 4S - 5.0.1
    BlackBerry Torch 9800 - 6.0.0.600
    BlackBerry Curve 8900 - 5.0.0.461
    BlackBerry PlayBook - 1.0.8.6067
  16. Caymancroc's Avatar
    CrackBerry Abuser

    Posts
    470 Posts
    Global Posts
    479 Global Posts
    #16  

    Default

    A store with one phone in it? Good luck with that. Would you at least put the Playbook in it?

    At least you wouldn't need much space. 9 square feet and one employee should do. You could give the employee an iPhone to do payment processing so you wouldn't need to take up space for a point of sale (register).

    The problem is when you order signs for said 9 SF of space they must be very small, thus your "free advertising" would be need to be read with a magnifying glass.

    Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
    richardat likes this.
  17. brucep1's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius

    Posts
    1,674 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,695 Global Posts
    PIN
    vokestackimbalance was detected
    #17  

    Default

    What people are failing to realize is that RIM is in no position to do this. There are so many different groups of people that would get pissed off at RIM spending money on Retail stores instead of other ways.

    The groups:

    All PlayBook owners

    At this point, who knows when 2.0 and android player are actually coming. Can you imagine if before they got this update RIM opened all these retail stores? Everyone who was already doubting RIM would sell their PlayBooks for pennies on the dollar.

    Current Retail Distribution Channels

    Try telling the stores that you've given an unsuccesful product to that you'll be opening your own stores and prepare for the can of worms that will come shortly after.

    Shareholders

    Don't even know where to start with this one.
    1.) You've already burned through so much of your cash in R & D, now you want to burn through the rest with retail stores?
    2.) How long until these retail stores catch on, if ever? Shareholders have waited long enough already for a bounce back, prepare to see a floor price. At this point, the last thing Shareholders want is a long-term investment.
    3.) The reaction of Wall Street, exactly.."RIM, stop trying to be something your not."
    I survived the Storm of 2008 and the PlayBook of 2011.
  18. _StephenBB81's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses

    Posts
    8,236 Posts
    Global Posts
    8,251 Global Posts
    #18  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brucep1 View Post
    What people are failing to realize is that RIM is in no position to do this. There are so many different groups of people that would get pissed off at RIM spending money on Retail stores instead of other ways.

    The groups:

    All PlayBook owners

    At this point, who knows when 2.0 and android player are actually coming. Can you imagine if before they got this update RIM opened all these retail stores? Everyone who was already doubting RIM would sell their PlayBooks for pennies on the dollar.
    I disagree! PlayBook Owners who are selfish would think the ONLY Thing RIM is working on is their PlayBook OS, things are slower, but the staff required to start a new project are not the same staff working on the OS, ESPECAIALLY if that new Project is opening a retail channel, I assure you no Software Engineers, or CompSci people would be used for this project


    Quote Originally Posted by brucep1 View Post
    Current Retail Distribution Channels

    Try telling the stores that you've given an unsuccesful product to that you'll be opening your own stores and prepare for the can of worms that will come shortly after.
    You are coming off as a disgruntled PlayBook owner based on these 2 points, not thinking of it as a business,
    What RIM would have to do by Opening a retail channel is ensure their current distribution maintains their margins, and ensures that their margins are safe as RIM will not be undercutting or even matching Advertised prices.
    YES there are lots of cans of worms that could be open, but RIM easily could offer product buy backs for Retail locations within a specific square mileage of the direct locations, and this would appease most large distribution channels, having the option to return unsold inventory without restocking fee's is a great bargaining tool for manufacturers.

    Quote Originally Posted by brucep1 View Post

    Shareholders

    Don't even know where to start with this one.
    1.) You've already burned through so much of your cash in R & D, now you want to burn through the rest with retail stores?
    2.) How long until these retail stores catch on, if ever? Shareholders have waited long enough already for a bounce back, prepare to see a floor price. At this point, the last thing Shareholders want is a long-term investment.
    3.) The reaction of Wall Street, exactly.."RIM, stop trying to be something your not."
    You shouldn't have even started.
    Retail would increase RIM's ASP, if it were to take off, which is a real IF, but with the inclusion of other product offerings branded by RIM it could mean greater margins, localized support tools, and a better marketing/sales strategy, all things Shareholders would like to see.
    Having excess liquid cash does nothing for shareholders, Shareholders want reinvestment into the company with potentials for Growth, those looking for long term investment and not short term growth would see a retail channel as RIM's attempt to take back control of it's North American market as it has clearly seen a loss of favour from the current channels, those looking for short terms sales actually want to break RIM up, sell off the chunks and maximize profits for their portfolio in the short term.
    oops...
    Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. \
  19. _StephenBB81's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses

    Posts
    8,236 Posts
    Global Posts
    8,251 Global Posts
    #19  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sam_b77 View Post
    All the above are already here in India. Except for the 3 models of Playbook .
    The only difference being that the exclusive stores are opened and run by the RIM India distributor, Redington.
    They have opened a huge number of RIM stores in Delhi. Some in popular market and many in malls. The display is divided on the lines you have mentioned in your post.
    The distributor alson handles the retail channels for RIM. So maybe RIM can take a lesson from them on how to manage margins so that their retails channels are not pis*ed with the exclusive stores.
    The distributor has also opened repair and service centers. These are directly managed by the distributor, but the branding and display is all Blackberry, so most people think they are interacting with RIM directly. The service center is pretty fancy I might add. Lots of Blackberry branding all over and good interior design.
    Maybe RIM doesn't need to get into retail stores directly, but just appoint country distributors and let them manage that side of the business.
    There's always a risk when a manufacturer tries to enter the retail space directly. Apple is an exception not the rule.

    The problem in North America is the established channels that already exist, in India those channels did not exist, and the Distributors here would risk seeing other distributors getting competing products from their customer base because they created a direct channel, once you start with 1 product line what will stop you from making another?

    IT is awesome that what I mentioned already exists, I would love to see some footage of a larger BlackBerry Store, to see if my vision in my mind is what they actually have done.
    oops...
    Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. \
  20. _StephenBB81's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses

    Posts
    8,236 Posts
    Global Posts
    8,251 Global Posts
    #20  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gng11 View Post
    youtube.com/watch?v=OJtQeMHGrgc

    This is Steve Jobs introducing the first Apple Store in 2001. Notice there were only a few products then, the iMac and the iBook. If Apple accomplished it, then RIM can do it. And in 2001, RIM was ahead of the pack. Apple was only about to enter the mobile devices market.
    Do you remember 2001?

    Apple had less than 4% market share in the global Personal computer market

    When Apple Launched it's first retail store, they didn't have mass distribution, they didn't have any market dominance to speak of, AND the product mix they sold had an average price of a little over $1500

    in a RIM based Store where they have heavy distribution in place, (read competition) a RIM store Average product price would be under $400

    their revenue would be drastically lower than the first Apple Store and would then be doomed to fail.
    oops...
    Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. \
  21. _StephenBB81's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses

    Posts
    8,236 Posts
    Global Posts
    8,251 Global Posts
    #21  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rootbrian View Post
    And RIM won't just listen to one person either.

    Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
    That's why they need 2 CEO's


    They wont listen to 1 persons good idea, the need 2 people to agree on a bad one


    NOT saying the OP has a good idea.
    oops...
    Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. \
  22. brucep1's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius

    Posts
    1,674 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,695 Global Posts
    PIN
    vokestackimbalance was detected
    #22  

    Default

    [QUOTE=deRusett;6754661]I disagree! PlayBook Owners who are selfish would think the ONLY Thing RIM is working on is their PlayBook OS, things are slower, but the staff required to start a new project are not the same staff working on the OS, ESPECAIALLY if that new Project is opening a retail channel, I assure you no Software Engineers, or CompSci people would be used for this project
    [QUOTE]

    You failed to understand my point. I am talking about perception, not facts. It is fairly obvious that the people working on QNX aren't the people that would be involved in the planning of retail stores.

    You need to look at this from a public perspective. How will it look to disgruntled owners for RIM to open up retail stores and not fixed the problems that have plagued their product line?
    I survived the Storm of 2008 and the PlayBook of 2011.
  23. brucep1's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius

    Posts
    1,674 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,695 Global Posts
    PIN
    vokestackimbalance was detected
    #23  

    Default

    deRussett,

    All I am saying is RIM needs to improve their timetables and product lines. Fix the problems that have plagued devices. Without doing this first, I don't see Wall Street being positive on any other moves. Maybe acquisitions, but certainly not retail chains.
    I survived the Storm of 2008 and the PlayBook of 2011.
  24. CrackedBarry's Avatar
    CrackBerry Master

    Posts
    1,242 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,318 Global Posts
    #24  

    Default

    Question: If RIM can't manage a simple tablet launch properly, nor release upgrades to either phones nor tablets on anything even resembling a proper schedule...

    How on EARTH do you imagine that they're able to launch AND manage something as complicated as a whole retail chain, especially without any prior experience?

    I mean, jeez... Imagine their stores... Some of them would probably open with no inventory, while another store would open with nothing but BB Torch in stock. Some of them would have one guy to man all the registers, while they'd have two or three people for each register in other stores. Heck, some of them would probably have the whole roof collapse on the store within a couple of weeks of opening. Nope, it wouldn't be pretty...
  25. _StephenBB81's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses

    Posts
    8,236 Posts
    Global Posts
    8,251 Global Posts
    #25  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brucep1 View Post
    You failed to understand my point. I am talking about perception, not facts. It is fairly obvious that the people working on QNX aren't the people that would be involved in the planning of retail stores.

    You need to look at this from a public perspective. How will it look to disgruntled owners for RIM to open up retail stores and not fixed the problems that have plagued their product line?
    Well based on your other statement of failed product, so approximately 500,000 of a reachable market of 3billion users, would be upset, a ratio smaller than the ratio of users unhappy with the loss of the scroll wheel to those who embraced the trackball

    Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions